- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/26/20 at 8:32 pm to LSUengr
quote:
Landry wrote an opinion for them in July. I'd hardly call that a rush to push it forward. This fight should have happened back in the summer if Clay Schexnayder wasn't a JBE puppet. We would have been out of this for months. The legislature gave the governor emergency powers but put a checks and balances clause in it for this specific instance. King JBE has let the power go to his head so much that he cant understand basic English. It truly is sad that we have let the governor of LA act like a dictator.
I’m regarding an opinion on this specific petition.
Posted on 10/26/20 at 8:35 pm to treyk89
Pretty much echos the original opinion.
Posted on 10/26/20 at 8:36 pm to treyk89
quote:
I know exactly what I’m talking about. Trust me.
Apparently you don’t.
quote:
You’re out of your lane on this one. You should stick to trolling other people. It’s what you do best.
You wanna make a ban bet that you’re completely wrong on whatever you think you’re trying to prove.
quote:
For the record, numerous names on that petition were pressured into signing it and are already crawfishing. You will see soon enough how much of a waste of time the petition was.

You’re about as reliable as PEEJ’s weather predictions
Posted on 10/26/20 at 8:36 pm to treyk89
I think JBE is wrong that the original emergency powers law is unconstitutional. The Legislature can delegate their police power and they can take it back under their own terms.
Posted on 10/26/20 at 8:37 pm to treyk89
quote:
Why would I want to meet any backwoods inbred on here?
You won’t because you’re a pussy
Posted on 10/26/20 at 8:47 pm to tgrbaitn08
Has Gumbo PAC Guys chimed in yet?
Posted on 10/26/20 at 8:49 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:
you pretend to be some insider but have nothing to back up your bullshite. You’re about as reliable as PEEJ’s weather predictions
Show me where I’ve been wrong tho. I’ll wait
My life doesn’t revolve around TD so I’ll take that ban bet. You guys are focused so hard on the petition and not enough on what it’s actually doing. It’s more than a petition and will more than likely be viewed as an act of legislation when this is in court. There are also specifics under the Health Emergency Act that will also make it difficult for the petition to really work.
I’m not advocating that we continue to wear masks and have restrictions, I’m simply providing insight into this situation and people are getting butt hurt. You guys have really have no clue. The courts have and will continue to support JBE’s COVID response.
Posted on 10/26/20 at 8:52 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:
You won’t because you’re a pussy
I’m free at lunch tomorrow. 900 N 3rd street, BR
I’ll come right down.
Posted on 10/26/20 at 8:53 pm to treyk89
quote:
The legislature, by petition signed by a majority of the surviving members of either house, may terminate a state of disaster or emergency at any time. This petition terminating the state of emergency or disaster may establish a period during which no other declaration of emergency or disaster may be issued. Thereupon, the governor shall issue an executive order or proclamation ending the state of disaster or emergency.
Explain how or why JBE thinks the senate needs to be involved, or either house needs to have a 2/3 majority based upon this?
Posted on 10/26/20 at 8:55 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
Explain how or why JBE thinks the senate needs to be involved, or either house needs to have a 2/3 majority based upon this?
Because the reach of the petition will be viewed as legislation when it goes to court, and legislation requires house and senate.
Posted on 10/26/20 at 8:55 pm to treyk89
quote:
I’m free at lunch tomorrow. 900 N 3rd street, BR I’ll come right down.
There’s a sonic on government, need to meet there
Posted on 10/26/20 at 8:58 pm to treyk89
quote:
Because the reach of the petition will be viewed as legislation when it goes to court, and legislation requires house and senate.
Then what is the point of including the ability to petition by either house in the first place? Why was it included in the state constitution if, in your opinion, a petition to stop an emergency declaration would be viewed as legislation?
ETA: also, it’s humorous to assume that the petition should be viewed as legislation, when the order itself is acting as self legislated law by the governor.
This post was edited on 10/26/20 at 9:00 pm
Posted on 10/26/20 at 8:58 pm to LSU-MNCBABY
quote:
There’s a sonic on government, need to meet there
My big arse doesn’t need to be anywhere near a sonic.
Posted on 10/26/20 at 9:00 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
Then what is the point of including the ability to petition by either house in the first place? Why was it included in the state constitution if, in your opinion, a petition to stop an emergency declaration would be viewed as legislation?
It shouldn’t have been in there in the first place and JBE is arguing that it’s unconstitutional. JBE has the support of the court. He won’t lose.
Posted on 10/26/20 at 9:00 pm to treyk89
quote:
My big arse doesn’t need to be anywhere near a sonic.
Or catching da Rona
Posted on 10/26/20 at 9:03 pm to treyk89
quote:
It shouldn’t have been in there in the first place and JBE is arguing that it’s unconstitutional. JBE has the support of the court. He won’t lose.
So courts legislating from the bench, I feel like I’ve seen this before.
Posted on 10/26/20 at 9:08 pm to treyk89
quote:
It shouldn’t have been in there in the first place and JBE is arguing that it’s unconstitutional. JBE has the support of the court. He won’t lose.
A simple majority of either chamber is actually less offensive to separation of powers principles and is a better safeguard of democratic norms than requiring both chambers.
The legislature chose to delegate their police powers under certain conditions and they can choose the terms by which they take back that power.
The federal emergency powers law is worse, and we saw that with Trump and the wall funding. Because the federal law required a concurrent resolution from both chambers, it allowed for the executive to seize power and because the Senate would not approve the resolution, it couldn’t be ended. The Louisiana law as written is actually more protective of the minority party and makes it harder for an usurpation by the executive.
This post was edited on 10/26/20 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 10/26/20 at 9:12 pm to treyk89
quote:
My big arse doesn’t need to be anywhere near a sonic.
How big a fella are you?
Popular
Back to top
