Started By
Message

re: Ivermectin OTC - but needs a doctor order

Posted on 9/3/25 at 7:57 am to
Posted by cwil177
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
29544 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 7:57 am to
quote:

Why does everybody want this?
quote:

believing facebooks posts like a dumb Karen

Answered your own question
Posted by winkchance
St. George, LA
Member since Jul 2016
6011 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:03 am to
The whole point of the post was not a covid debate but the reality that they made a big deal about this being OTC. That does not mean what people think it means. it is not on the shelf at your Walgreens of CVS in Louisiana. It is behind the counter at the pharmacy and you need an order from your doctor. So big political theater for something that has not changed.

Any doctor in big pharma pocket is not going to write the order.
Posted by cwil177
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
29544 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:08 am to
quote:

Any doctor in big pharma pocket is not going to write the order.

Still waiting for big pharma to pay off my student loans.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
31823 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:08 am to
quote:

Zephyrius


As someone who does this for a living, there's a lot of holes to the study (particularly ones that use propensity score matching).

Also just as a FYI - not all publications are created equal and this is one of them that reflects that.

Getting published in say CHEST has significantly higher meaning because they will poke the smallest holes in your studies and even if you have high quality evidence, if there's faults they will not publish it (As to why it has an impact factor of 10+) while CUREUS and PLOSone are easier to get published and you can have MANY faults and issues in your research (their impact factor are like 1-2 which is not even average).
Posted by FearTheFish
Member since Dec 2007
4288 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:16 am to
quote:

Do you get tested before taking pepto bismol?
How some of you navigate through life truly is astonishing.
Posted by cwil177
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
29544 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:23 am to
That study was widely discredited due to severe methodological issues in the study. LINK

quote:

“The main shortcoming here is that the program was optional – and we know well from decades of literature, that those who choose to seek healthcare and take medicines are inherently different from those who do not,” Dr. Mark Siedner, an infectious disease clinician and clinical epidemiologist at Massachusetts General Hospital, told Reuters via email.

“There are also a number of additional shortcomings that have to do with missing data,” Seidner said. Referring to the 71,548 "moderate” users of ivermectin excluded from the analysis entirely, as well as the calculations based on small matched subsets of 283 people, he noted, “for example, almost half the sample appears to have been excluded and nearly 99% was excluded in their analysis that included age and health problems, and there is no good way of accounting for infection rates in people who were never tested.”


Plus, observational data is poor at showing cause and effect. RCTs on this issue have shown no benefit. LINK

Posted by Zephyrius
Wharton, La.
Member since Dec 2004
9281 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:32 am to
quote:

while CUREUS and PLOSone are easier to get published and you can have MANY faults and issues in your research

I used just one of the many articles doing just a google search. There are many other studies in research/ info which come to the same conclusions of the article and it is one of the latest articles out which support many of the conclusions which were already being made at the height of Covid. The article linked also references the studies to support its conclusions.

Also its rich that many of our "trusted" medical media and authorities on medical treatments were suppressing and out right lying about the benefits of Ivermectin.

quote:

As someone who does this for a living, there's a lot of holes to the study

How about linking to some of these "holes" you are purporting to be in the study.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
128528 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:39 am to
Maybe ivermectin has some benefits early in the disease. But there has never been a real study to prove that

And the current covid is so mild I have no idea why you would want to be on long term ivermectin to prevent it.
Posted by Zephyrius
Wharton, La.
Member since Dec 2004
9281 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 8:43 am to
quote:

Maybe ivermectin has some benefits early in the disease. But there has never been a real study to prove that

Well, the major benefit today is to use as a prophylactic. And there are plenty of studies to prove its efficacy.

And there are 72 references to studies in the CUREUSl link which was published in 2024.

This post was edited on 9/3/25 at 8:49 am
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
128528 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 9:55 am to
quote:

Well, the major benefit today is to use as a prophylactic. And there are plenty of studies to prove its efficacy.


Why would you need a prophylactic for the current iteration of covid?
Posted by N2cars
Close by
Member since Feb 2008
37866 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 10:05 am to
Accurate post.


Personally, IDC if idiots get Invermectin and drink it. In fact, I would encourage it.

Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
23073 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Why does everybody want this?


This is a silly question. How else do you treat your labrador with red mange?
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
3946 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 10:35 am to
Buy it all day on Amazon.

Not sure of your point
Posted by LSUA 75
Colfax,La.
Member since Jan 2019
4615 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 10:39 am to
“Maybe ivermectin has some benefits early in the disease.But there has never been a real study to prove that.”

Dr.Mary Talley Bowden treated 4,000 pts.with ivermectin with only 1 death.It’s documented.
Did she do a placebo controlled “real” study.No,she didn’t.Does that prove that ivermectin doesn’t work? Not in my mind,it doesn’t.
My personal experience-I took ivermectin immediately after I tested positive
for Covid,My symptoms(fever,cough,muscle aches )were gone in less than 24 hrs.Did same for stepson,dtr-in-law,grandson and granddaughter,with same results,symptoms gone within 24 hours.

Dr.Joseph Varon,medical director of an ICU in Houston,famous for working some 700+ days in a row,treated his pts. with ivermectin plus some other things had a 95% survival rate when the average for ICU’s around the country was about 75%.His pts.were typically very ill,some critical when he got them.
I suppose you think he should have done a placebo controlled study.
Posted by Dr Lecter
Baltimore, MD
Member since Oct 2012
1340 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 10:43 am to
That’s a lot of writing which means almost nothing.
Posted by Rantavious
Bossier ''get down'' City
Member since Jan 2007
2114 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 10:54 am to
Ivermectin has been used to treat a number of medical issues in the developing world for decades. Billions of people treated at this point. It is a miracle drug in terms of efficacy versus cost. Anyone who fails to recognize this is being willfully ignorant.
Posted by N2cars
Close by
Member since Feb 2008
37866 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 11:02 am to
And yet, no one in this thread is saying that it isnt a welk-tested, effective drug. It is likely the best anti-parasitic drug ever.

If you think your "cancers" is caused by parasites, by all means, drink it down.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
128528 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Dr.Mary Talley Bowden treated 4,000 pts.with ivermectin with only 1 death.It’s documented.


What are the demographics and risk factors?

The death rate from covid was like 1 in 1000 for all comers in this country so her treatment results are probably not a statistically significant difference from no treatment at all except supportive care
This post was edited on 9/3/25 at 11:12 am
Posted by Rantavious
Bossier ''get down'' City
Member since Jan 2007
2114 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 11:13 am to
That Is exactly what people are inferring in this thread - everyone who discounts the drug as a "horsewormer".

If everyone here thought it was safe and effective this thread would not exist.

Ivermectin' s application goes far beyond the 'prevention' of cancer
Posted by N2cars
Close by
Member since Feb 2008
37866 posts
Posted on 9/3/25 at 11:15 am to
Invermectin doesn't prevent cancer.
Invermectin hasn't been clinically proven to aid in the treatment of cancer.

first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram