Started By
Message

re: Is everyone here glad the North won the Civil War?

Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:55 am to
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
86492 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:55 am to
The Democrats were so pissed off about having to give up slavery that they started the KKK, put Jim Crow into force, killed thousands of innocent blacks, harassed and murdered white Republicans wherever they found them, etc. Democrats do like their racial identity politics.

The more things change...
Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Stick to animal threads, Pecker.


I find this highly insulting. Yes, I specialize in animals and male empowerment, but I'm far more versatile than that.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
61594 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 11:00 am to
quote:

I don't think slavery would have existed much longer even if the South would have won.
serious question- I always see this in these threads. Why does everyone think it was on its way out?
Posted by Kcrad
Diamondhead
Member since Nov 2010
68451 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 11:02 am to
Get over it. You're advice is even worse than Golden Nugget's. Matter of fact, I think you are GN. How do you feel about the Jooos?
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37542 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 11:04 am to
quote:

serious question- I always see this in these threads. Why does everyone think it was on its way out?



Politics was moving away and the majority of people even in the South didn't own slaves. After half the men in the country were mamed over the issue I would think most Southerners that were poor and slaveless anyway would have become indifferent to the issue at best. An attitude of "I've already fought in a war over this, I'm not doing it again, I don't own slaves anyway."
Posted by lsuoldft
Perdido Key, FL
Member since Jul 2014
277 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 11:04 am to
The CW set the South back but the North and the new states made tremendous strides in every economic area.
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
29644 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 11:04 am to
People think that the mechanization of agricultural labor during the industrial revolution would have made the demand for workers obsolete. That's not necessarily true, and it also doesn't account for the non-farm slaves (kitchen/house/etc.).
Posted by cj35
Member since Jan 2014
6153 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 11:06 am to
Absolutely. It just sucks Sherman didn't burn more. Slacker.
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
53837 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 11:06 am to
quote:

serious question- I always see this in these threads. Why does everyone think it was on its way out?

The industrial revolution and heavy machinery would have alleviated the need. Also it was becoming less an acceptable practice worldwide. I don't think it would have lasted more than another decade or two.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
61594 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 11:08 am to
quote:

The industrial revolution and heavy machinery would have alleviated the need.
what about the house slaves?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
117259 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 11:09 am to
No.

I abhor slavery and the war may have been necessary to dispose of it in the 1860s, but, it would most likely have died out on its own soon enough (certainly, by 1900).

It set the stage for the unconstitutional, liberty consuming leviathan that is the current federal government.
Posted by tiger chaser
Birmingham Ala
Member since Feb 2008
7721 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 11:10 am to
You must be a liberal dem
Posted by Kcrad
Diamondhead
Member since Nov 2010
68451 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Absolutely. It just sucks Sherman didn't burn more. Slacker.




Admiring a war criminal. Is this you talking or your brain tumor?
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
53837 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 11:11 am to
quote:

what about the house slaves?

I think it would have become socially unacceptable
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
45198 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 11:12 am to
It really doesnt matter.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
61594 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 11:13 am to
quote:

Admiring a war criminal. Is this you talking or your brain tumor?
what do you think about Cheney and W?
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37542 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 11:13 am to
quote:

what about the house slaves?


You know as well as I do that economic labor was what slavery was about. House slaves were a "luxury" because it was available. As said, the world view of slavery was changing around the time of the civil war anyway. As America was emerging in the world and the industrial revolution, slavery would have fallen out of favor and it was at the time anyway.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
58284 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 11:17 am to
quote:

know I am. America (and the world) is a better place because of it.


You are so brave for saying this. Nothing about your post is virtue signaling nor an attempt to ignite an internet argument. Not all heroes wear capes, and you, sir, are that hero.

Stunning and brave
Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 11:24 am to
quote:

You must be a liberal dem




for thinking that a Union victory was better for America?
Posted by Kcrad
Diamondhead
Member since Nov 2010
68451 posts
Posted on 3/17/18 at 11:25 am to
quote:

what do you think about Cheney and W?




You're saying they're war criminals?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram