Started By
Message

re: In other news, Congress just raised the age limit for buying tobacco to 21

Posted on 12/19/19 at 5:41 pm to
Posted by Tempratt
Member since Oct 2013
15317 posts
Posted on 12/19/19 at 5:41 pm to
Guess the kickbacks weren't big enough this time.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51416 posts
Posted on 12/19/19 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

What a crock,can vote, can enlist... can't drink or smoke.

land of the ……
home of the …….
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49577 posts
Posted on 12/19/19 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

So you can die in a war at 18, get the death penalty at 18 and vote for your leaders at 18, but you're not mature enough to smoke? Frick these nanny state types.


To be fair, you really shouldn’t be able to vote at 18
Posted by bigandy
Member since Aug 2019
116 posts
Posted on 12/19/19 at 6:05 pm to
I do believe that if you are old enough to go to war and get maimed or killed, that you should be able to drink or smoke.

Disclosure: I have never smoked, as I would not want to harm the temple that is Big Andy's body.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
10995 posts
Posted on 12/19/19 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

Wound nicely inside a spending bill to avoid a government shutdown is a provision that will raise the minimum age for buying tobacco to 21 years old.


Don't care about tobacco part, but I dislike how Congress does this to bills in general. Every common ground idea that would probably pass with 60% or more of the vote is used by both sides to include something that would never get majority by itself. Then sides start compromising some back & forth on enough parts of bill including pork barrel projects to get 50% plus 1. Spending bills should just be spending bills on already authorized programs not used to throw in crap.

Most people can agree to some needed fixes to immigration, but you just can't pass a fix for asylum language as even the ones that agree are going to hold out for DACA and a lot of other stuff, so it sits undone. I know some things are too complex for such a simplification, but I also think that's the mindset and that regardless They will work from a system of taking a simple highly supported common ground solution to use to get pages and pages of added stuff for political gain instead just passing common ground first and by itself. Not every law needs to be its own library. Yes Nancy P you should read bills first and know what's in them before passing them.

They also need to include more sunset provisions especially in new programs, laws, and tax increases. If they make it good enough to pass without a bunch of pay offs, pork barrel, and compromises that will only work for that one specific congress it will be good enough to re-authorize in couple of years.

Seniority needs to go away, and appointments should rotate. My decision making on which Senator or Rep to vote for shouldn't entail keeping or losing a place on a powerful committee. I can't speak for actual respect from others & ability to win leadership votes, but outside of that rules for Congress shouldn't favor one individual member over another just because of how long they have been in Congress. Once out of office they shouldn't be called Senator or President or speaker as they are job titles not titles of nobility.

Posted by USMEagles
Member since Jan 2018
11811 posts
Posted on 12/19/19 at 6:16 pm to
I support age limits. There is scarcely a real right (vs. an entitlement) in any system of law or ethics that doesn't come with an age limit.

Texting kid rear-ends people... BAN CELL PHONES WHILE DRIVING!

Kid sucks down a whole chicken-and-waffles Juul pod and can't breathe... BAN FLAVORED VAPES!

Kid shoots up his school... BAN SEMIAUTOMATIC RIFLES!

We can't build a world safe for these little frickers, so we have to acknowledge that their rights must be curtailed. And yes that does include voting, and yes it does include enlisted soldiers.
Posted by Tunasntigers92
The Boot
Member since Sep 2014
28325 posts
Posted on 12/19/19 at 6:17 pm to
Let them mother frickers smoke
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
22594 posts
Posted on 12/19/19 at 6:23 pm to
They’re going to do this with everything. Eventually it will be something you value.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
38507 posts
Posted on 12/19/19 at 6:43 pm to
Soooooo the underage kids will all just go full in for vaping get hooked on the nicotine and then at 21 go in for cigarettes. People will get the diseases a few years later now.


Look once you have let the genie out of the lamp you cannot put him back in.
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
36417 posts
Posted on 12/19/19 at 6:43 pm to
I am not reading g through 7 pages. Someone please tell me I am not the only one pissed off they shoved this in a budget bill when it has nothing to do with the budget. This kind of piggy backing is bullshite.
Posted by OKellsBells
USA
Member since Dec 2016
5264 posts
Posted on 12/19/19 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

Someone please tell me I am not the only one pissed off they shoved this in a budget bill when it has nothing to do with the budget.


I don’t agree that this isn’t budget related. Smokers and tobacco users are disproportionately costly to Medicare and Medicaid.

Posted by OutOfNames
Member since Dec 2019
1104 posts
Posted on 12/19/19 at 8:07 pm to
Poor skanks :(
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 12/19/19 at 8:12 pm to
frick the government.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91874 posts
Posted on 12/19/19 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

don’t agree that this isn’t budget related. Smokers and tobacco users are disproportionately costly to Medicare and Medicaid.



What do you think this bill will do for Medicare and Medicaid? Smoking has gone down tremendously on its own. Roughly 10% of 18-24 year olds smoke these days. This provision is just a feel good compromise from tobacco companies that has no real bite.
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
39253 posts
Posted on 12/19/19 at 11:01 pm to
Anyone think that this may be some sort of preparation for marijuana legalization?
Posted by CaptSpaulding
Member since Feb 2012
6980 posts
Posted on 12/19/19 at 11:21 pm to
quote:

no one should be

quote:

Austin


Checks out.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
22594 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 9:36 am to
quote:

People will get the diseases a few years later now.


This may be what you’re referencing. But that’s what happened with drunk driving.

Raising the drinking age didn’t lower road fatalities, it simply moved them. People were dying at the same rate, they we’re just slightly older when they did.
Posted by Murtown
OT Ballerville
Member since Sep 2014
1803 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Tobacco users should have to pay more in health insurance premiums (and not just that $25 nonsense that some companies enforce).


They do. A lot more
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram