- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ignorant BR PD Officer w/ FBI
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:49 am to TSLG
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:49 am to TSLG
quote:
officer said that the videographer looked suspicious.
Because you DID look suspicious! Dumbass, it is a FEDERAL building. Personally, I think you are one of the crazy fricks that would blow it up. If I drove to your trailer park, and started shooting video of your trailer, you wouldn't come see what the frick I was doing?
2
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:50 am to PrivatePublic
quote:
Pretty sure the courts have tackled this issue and the answer was no.
everyone is shitting on the guy for exercising his rights just go ahead and admit you wouldn't care if the right didn't exist.
Just a question, what if this guy was taking pictures of the building ?
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:51 am to Supermoto Tiger
I was waiting for the thread that said:
“Dumbass Constituional Audit “reporter” wasted BRPD and FBI time suspiciously filming federal building in order to illicit response”
Gets mad when officers check on his activity.
“Dumbass Constituional Audit “reporter” wasted BRPD and FBI time suspiciously filming federal building in order to illicit response”
Gets mad when officers check on his activity.
This post was edited on 12/31/18 at 11:52 am
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:51 am to PearlJam
Illegal detention is for the court to decide.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:52 am to 777Tiger
quote:
there a lot of things that are illegal to film or photograph, may not get you locked up(depending on your reaction,) but people in charge of securing whatever they are, certainly have the right to question you and make you stop
If you can see it from a public space it’s not illegal to film or photograph. They can ask questions just like anyone else in public could but they can’t (legally) make you stop.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:53 am to Catman88
quote:Well, it's already been decided what constitutes it. I can review that video and determine it was outside the lines drawn by the Courts.
Illegal detention is for the court to decide.
ETA: I understand you are just reading from your little pamphlet
This post was edited on 12/31/18 at 11:54 am
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:55 am to LSURussian
quote:
My question: the video guy says police officers do not have the right to ask a person for his name. I thought an officer has the right to ask a person for his name. Does anybody here know what's correct?
quote:
They can if they have reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed, is being committed, or is about to be committed.
I quoted another poster who answered your question.
Can you see the difference between a person looking suspicious and being able to articulate the facts that support a reasonable suspicion that a crime is, did, or will be committed?
Just an fyi:
If you want to help your local law enforcement out a little when you contact the police, you could always lie about the suspicious person's activities.
"There's a guy just walking around my neighborhood, and it looked like he was smoking a marijuana cigarette."
It'd be illegal on your part, but it would help the police to legally detain and id the fellow. In this scenario, the police are investigating a person for possible possession of a cds. This could easily be articulated: "a witness stated that he was smoking a marijuana cigarette."
It doesnt change anything, but I'd rather the constitution be trampled by someone who hasn't taken an oath to uphold it.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:57 am to 777Tiger
quote:
I wish people could get "detained" on here for acting weird.
quote:Especially in a nsfw thread with an OT 7 or above.
place would shut down
The weird shite said in those threads is creepy as frick.
This post was edited on 12/31/18 at 11:59 am
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:58 am to Dizz
quote:The police officer in the video never asked him to stop taking the video that I heard.
They can ask questions just like anyone else in public could but they can’t (legally) make you stop.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 12:02 pm to TSLG
You’re a dumbass.
Cops can stop, question, ask for a name for almost any reason. This isn’t some trampling of citizens rights.
I didn’t watch your video.
Cops can stop, question, ask for a name for almost any reason. This isn’t some trampling of citizens rights.
I didn’t watch your video.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 12:02 pm to LSURussian
I was responding to someone saying there are places and things you can’t photograph, not the video it’s self.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 12:03 pm to jmorr34
quote:
They can if they have reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed, is being committed, or is about to be committed.
So in a cop’s eyes, anytime they wish.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 12:03 pm to LSURussian
quote:He means stop freely going about his day, not stop videoing. For an officer to prevent you from freely going about your day is a detention and they have to meet certain standards to be able to do that legally.
The police officer in the video never asked him to stop taking the video that I heard.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 12:05 pm to PearlJam
I dont expect every law enforcement officer in the country to know the results of Musumeci v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Thats why if he doesnt like it take it to the court to decide. At least we will know of the douche is traveling around just trying to make money off the government.
He also wasnt arrested like in that case. Only real infraction I see is removing his wallet. Stopping him and asking who he is and what he is doing is not against anyones rights.
He also wasnt arrested like in that case. Only real infraction I see is removing his wallet. Stopping him and asking who he is and what he is doing is not against anyones rights.
This post was edited on 12/31/18 at 12:07 pm
Posted on 12/31/18 at 12:06 pm to Supermoto Tiger
quote:
If I drove to your trailer park, and started shooting video of your trailer, you wouldn't come see what the frick I was doing?
Absolutely I would. I would also expect that the police quickly show up to Lot 27 and find out what the frick the guy is doing near my single-wide.
I'd also be upset if the the officer walked up on my deck, knocked on the door, and told me that they couldn't legally identify the a-hole who was shooting video of my mobile home.
However, that doesn't change the fact that we all have certain rights in this country. If you don't like them, they can be changed. I promise you that law enforcement won't mind not havin those pesky rights interfering with their investigations.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 12:08 pm to TSLG
Oi vey! He threw me on the hood! What a douche! Stop casing the FBI building. Remember Timothy McVeigh?
Posted on 12/31/18 at 12:08 pm to Meauxjeaux
quote:
Cops can stop, question, ask for a name for almost any reason. This isn’t some trampling of citizens rights.
You're wrong.
But that's what they want you to think, good little sheep.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 12:09 pm to Catman88
You don’t expect police to know the law? I say that you he and cheek. I would expect every department to be aware of it and have provided information to the rank and file about how to handle public photography.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 12:12 pm to Catman88
quote:That's wrong so far as the stopping means he isn't free to just go about his business.
. Stopping him and asking who he is and what he is doing is not against anyones rights.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 12:12 pm to HeadSlash
Timothy McVeigh means all other citizen rights must be trampled? That’s a dumb argument. Same reason you can’t carry shampoo or liquids on a plane over one person. I don’t want my rights determined by one extreme case.
Of course you should feel free to waive all of yours. I’m sure you are rushing out to do this like the libs are sending in more taxes voluntarily.
Of course you should feel free to waive all of yours. I’m sure you are rushing out to do this like the libs are sending in more taxes voluntarily.
Page 3 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News