- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:31 am to thelawnwranglers
quote:
Guy wanted attention he got attention
yep, both are douches, imo
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:34 am to TSLG
This video is stupid as hell.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:35 am to jmorr34
quote:Okay, thanks. In that case I guess it comes down to what is "reasonable suspicion" that a crime is about to happen.
They can if they have reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed, is being committed, or is about to be committed.
Is it enough reasonable suspicion that a person is taking a video of a law enforcement agency's building? I don't know.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:36 am to 777Tiger
quote:
yep, both are douches, imo
Agreed
I understand FBI wanting to talk to guy
Just seems like an easy oh you are one of those douches that wants me to be s prick
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:36 am to TSLG
How About - don't act like a freaking d-bag creeper, then refuse to cooperate with the police.
Screw these idiots and their cameras wasting time.
Screw these idiots and their cameras wasting time.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:37 am to TSLG
In the battle of arrogant, power hungry cops vs weasely guy baiting them into a confrontation we have a draw. All are equal douchebags.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:37 am to TSLG
quote:
TSLG
I hate assholes like you. I stopped watching your lame video once I realized you were shooting video of a FEDERAL building. Remember the Oklahoma City bombing of the FBI building? Do you remember 9/11?
If you go around shooting video of FEDERAL buildings, you piece of shite, you deserve whatever happens to you.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:37 am to jmorr34
They don’t need a reason to ask what your name is. Whether you respond is another issue.
This post was edited on 12/31/18 at 11:39 am
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:38 am to LSURussian
First off, I wish I had the money and time to do nothing all day but film buildings. Must be nice.
Second, what is happening in these buildings (or who do these public servants think they are) that somehow filming the building or them is the height of outrage for them. How dare a person take a picture of our building!
It’s all moronic.
Second, what is happening in these buildings (or who do these public servants think they are) that somehow filming the building or them is the height of outrage for them. How dare a person take a picture of our building!
It’s all moronic.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:38 am to TSLG
I like your video
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:38 am to 777Tiger
quote:
was going to point out that was the wrong term, OP is ignorant of the defintion
I was giving the officer the benefit of the doubt. I absolutely know what ignorant means, and I do not find it as a derogatory term, which is why I chose the word.
When asked to articulate facts about the crime committed, the officer said that the videographer looked suspicious.
Well, that's not how it works. Being suspicious isn't a crime. So, the officer was either ignorant of the law, didn't give a frick about the guy's constitutional rights in general, or didn't give a frick about the guy's constitutional rights when weighed against the well being of himself and fellow officers in the BR area.
I chose the ignorant of the law one, bc it seems to be the most respectful label for the actions of a guy with a tough arse job.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:39 am to TSLG
This is stupid. Its not illegal to take video of a federal building. But sitting on the road doing so with the intent of getting a response in a post 9/11 world you are going to raise suspicion. Asking for identification when you are acting suspicious is not placing someone under arrest. In Louisiana you are required to identify yourself to police. You can be arrested if you refuse to identify yourself.
Source: Know Your Rights Guide - Louisiana Public Defender Board
Source: Know Your Rights Guide - Louisiana Public Defender Board
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:42 am to Catman88
I usually like these videos but in this case the person was just there to get response.
Cop maybe didn't handle it the best but I agree it was a douchebag draw
Cop maybe didn't handle it the best but I agree it was a douchebag draw
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:42 am to LSURussian
quote:
Is it enough reasonable suspicion that a person is taking a video of a law enforcement agency's building? I don't know.
Pretty sure the courts have tackled this issue and the answer was no.
everyone is shitting on the guy for exercising his rights just go ahead and admit you wouldn't care if the right didn't exist.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:43 am to Catman88
quote:It's an illegal detention unless there is reasonable suspicion of illegal activity or the person is at all times free to go.
Asking for identification when you are acting suspicious is not placing someone under arrest.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:43 am to Supermoto Tiger
quote:
If you go around shooting video of FEDERAL buildings, you piece of shite, you deserve whatever happens to you.
there a lot of things that are illegal to film or photograph, may not get you locked up(depending on your reaction,) but people in charge of securing whatever they are, certainly have the right to question you and make you stop, and I'm the type of guy that hates too many rules and regs, but you kind of have to have a little common sense about it
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:44 am to Catman88
One thing is for sure, he is lucky he is white. Had a black man tried to illicit a response, that camera would have looked suspiscously like a gun and someone would have been quick on the trigger.
This post was edited on 12/31/18 at 11:44 am
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:46 am to Supermoto Tiger
Sounds ike this douche could use a little "stick time" with Sheriff Ackal and his deputies. 
Posted on 12/31/18 at 11:47 am to LSURussian
quote:
Is it enough reasonable suspicion that a person is taking a video of a law enforcement agency's building? I don't know.
No, the courts have held that public photography is not reasonable suspicion and that anything you can see with your eyes from a public place is fair game. Google earth takes the same pictures and you don’t see cops pulling them over for suspicious activity.
Page 2 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News