- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

If you own a business in a large town
Posted on 5/30/20 at 8:52 am
Posted on 5/30/20 at 8:52 am
I highly recommend that you put "owner is black" on your window/door. good luck.
Posted on 5/30/20 at 8:54 am to oldcharlie8
Because that’s stopped looters and rioters in the past
Posted on 5/30/20 at 8:54 am to oldcharlie8
"Owner is Korean" may hold more clout
Posted on 5/30/20 at 8:55 am to oldcharlie8
Don’t matter baw. You think they checking for an “owner is black” sign?
Get an Ed-209
Get an Ed-209
Posted on 5/30/20 at 8:55 am to oldcharlie8
Like that matters. Roof Koreans are the only way to protect a business during a riot.
Posted on 5/30/20 at 8:56 am to oldcharlie8
My Nepalese gurkhas are on high alert.
Posted on 5/30/20 at 8:56 am to oldcharlie8
If you own a business, you’re one of the bad guys period!!!!!
Posted on 5/30/20 at 8:56 am to rintintin
Not in Minneapolis. Mayor said defending your business or not if you kill a rioter, you’re going to jail.
Posted on 5/30/20 at 9:00 am to oldcharlie8
like a Passover for anifa or something?
Posted on 5/30/20 at 9:02 am to Klark Kent
Doesn’t seem like something he has the power to do.
Minnesota law on use of force allows for it:
Minnesota law on use of force allows for it:
quote:
4) when used by any person in lawful possession of real or personal property, or by another assisting the person in lawful possession, in resisting a trespass upon or other unlawful interference with such property; or
quote:
609.065 JUSTIFIABLE TAKING OF LIFE. The intentional taking of the life of another is not authorized by section 609.06, except when necessary in resisting or preventing an offense which the actor reasonably believes exposes the actor or another to great bodily harm or death, or preventing the commission of a felony in the actor's place of abode.
This post was edited on 5/30/20 at 9:05 am
Posted on 5/30/20 at 9:05 am to TH03
I would hope state law holds up if people are defending their own businesses.
Posted on 5/30/20 at 9:07 am to TH03
quote:
Doesn’t seem like something he has the power to do.
It's based on how MN laws are worded. In short if you are the potential victim of a violent act, it is your job to escape and not use lethal force to defend yourself.
quote:
place of abode.
That only applies to your home and if you're preventing a felony.
This post was edited on 5/30/20 at 9:11 am
Posted on 5/30/20 at 9:07 am to Klark Kent
I’m sure the mayor could have someone arrested, but I would like my chances in court over an overzealous mayor.
Posted on 5/30/20 at 9:09 am to YeahYeah
quote:
it is your job to escape and not use lethal force to defend yourself.
*If possible.
If you’re in your business and a crowd of rioters surrounds you, escape isn’t possible.
Posted on 5/30/20 at 9:11 am to oldcharlie8
Rent a good numbers of u hauls.
Take everything of value out now moving it off site well out of town to unknown location to even employees before noon when thugs get up.
Leave empty safe open.
Break windows and make it look damaged.
Hopefully the next night it looks looted and not worth their time.
Take everything of value out now moving it off site well out of town to unknown location to even employees before noon when thugs get up.
Leave empty safe open.
Break windows and make it look damaged.
Hopefully the next night it looks looted and not worth their time.
This post was edited on 5/30/20 at 9:13 am
Posted on 5/30/20 at 9:12 am to TH03
quote:
*If possible.
If you’re in your business and a crowd of rioters surrounds you, escape isn’t possible
MN has been very anti stand your ground, i wouldn't be surprised that a jury would agree that the rioters would not have harmed you had you walked out the front door
Posted on 5/30/20 at 9:13 am to upgrayedd
I wonder if there is any grounds for a lawsuit against the city of Minneapolis or the mayor for allowing this to happen.
Posted on 5/30/20 at 9:13 am to YeahYeah
quote:
MN has been very anti stand your ground, i wouldn't be surprised that a jury would agree that the rioters would not have harmed you had you walked out the front door
You're confusing self defense with stand your ground.
Popular
Back to top

14









