Started By
Message

re: I am on the fence about whether #teampanic or #teamoverreaction is right

Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:51 am to
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
40817 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:51 am to
quote:

They're both right



Team radical centrist

Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
61732 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:53 am to
quote:

By reallocating resources and canceling revenue generating procedures and surgeries in anticipation of the critically ill wave of patients that don’t materialize and don’t pay.
oh, they are materializing. But yes, you are correct.

Posted by NOLA Tiger
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2006
844 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:55 am to
There are people that claimed 7-10 days ago that the hospitals would be overwhelmed in 7-10 days. Starting to feel more doomsday-esque.
Posted by the_watcher
Jarule's House
Member since Nov 2005
3451 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 8:57 am to
quote:

It's not that the concern is everyone getting infected. The concern is everyone getting affected AT SAME TIME

I don’t mean this in a condescending tone at all, I’m truly curious. What are you under the impression the hospitalization rate for someone testing positive for COVID 19 is? What % of positive tests will need to be admitted as inpatients in an actual hospital?
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
48700 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 9:22 am to
Options

1. Overreact(possibly), cause economic hardship but possibly save lives by not overwhelming hospital resources. The problem is if we are wrong it is hard to prove that as people will say that the perceived overreaction saved lives and resources.

2. Do very little directly, warn people to wash their hands and practice social distancing whenever possible but do not shut things down in order to protect businesses and jobs. If very little happens, that's great but if this is the wrong approach we will have an untold number of deaths and an overwhelmed medical system which then leads to more needless deaths not directly related to COVID-19. People may say this would have happened anyway and that is also tough to prove.

So I have no idea what the right answer is but I think I'd prefer the risk associated with option 1 than option 2.



Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40259 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 9:47 am to
No Louisiana is good enough for me. Thanks and stay safe.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
42780 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 9:52 am to
Team overreaction would have been right 2 months ago. Now what they are doing isn’t stopping the spread of anything.
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
21114 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 9:53 am to
quote:

I am on the fence about whether #teampanic or #teamoverreaction is right


I keep seeing and hearing the word panic. Who the frick is panicking?

Is it the frickin' weirdos who hoard ammo? Is it the anxious Moms who hoard toilet paper? Is it federal, state and local governments trying limit movement and mitigate the disease? Is it folks buying up all the ribs at Walmart?

Where's all this frickin' panic I've been hearing about?

I see unusual buying trends. I haven't seen one single person or group of people panic though.
Posted by kciDAtaE
Member since Apr 2017
17804 posts
Posted on 3/20/20 at 9:56 am to
quote:

We're never really going to know, unfortunately.


I hope not. If we do find out, the only answer is TeamPanic was correct and we all die...I hope this is a massive overreaction and we sending memes about the Astros in a month
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram