Started By
Message

re: Homebuilders cancelling contracts to sell for more on market

Posted on 3/29/22 at 12:35 pm to
Posted by NOLAVOL16
Member since Jan 2022
873 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 12:35 pm to
Agreed. Middle TN is growing leaps and bounds. Anyone new coming in can see the school ratings and make their choice. I do know current residents however that moved across county lines specifically because of pandemic restrictions though.
Posted by hubreb
Member since Nov 2008
1851 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

LSUFanHouston

I know you are trying to be cute, but



With out getting into to much detail - let me just say that I know a whole more about this than the dribble you have been posting in this thread

a few things
- the rental property funds are not hedge fund strategies, but rather low income / libor enhanced plus type returns...biggest buyers are short duration buyers

the PMs don't own significant amounts of anything with regards to managers like Black Rock - they manage nearly 10 trillion

unless something has changed lately, the largest single family real estate fund was owned by Black Stone...they started the strategy a long time ago...there are also a few european managers that have had groups in the US buying single family real estate for EU country pensions, know a couple personally
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37140 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

- the rental property funds are not hedge fund strategies, but rather low income / libor enhanced plus type returns...biggest buyers are short duration buyers


How long is the short duration? Do you expect them to start selling the moment the market turns?

quote:

the PMs don't own significant amounts of anything with regards to managers like Black Rock - they manage nearly 10 trillion


They own enough of it that they fight like tooth and nail to keep carried interest from being ordinary income. They also know (correctly) that real estate is a GREAT investment strategy to grown wealth. Aren't many of them paid fees based upon assets under management?
Posted by hubreb
Member since Nov 2008
1851 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

How long is the short duration? Do you expect them to start selling the moment the market turns?


short duration is not how long you own, but the interest rate sensitivity - they are able to buy the homes slightly above market value because they fund at what was libor + a spread between 140 and 200bps - much cheaper than what funding cost were for the average home buyer a few years back...the buyers of the securitization or fund are earning much more than they could on ordinary high quality adjustable rate assets

quote:

They own enough of it that they fight like tooth and nail to keep carried interest from being ordinary income. They also know (correctly) that real estate is a GREAT investment strategy to grown wealth. Aren't many of them paid fees based upon assets under management?



any this case, the fees are built into the beginning of the transaction - there is not enough spread or excess return in these transactions like you would have in a private equity trade with a 4-5 year horizon.

they only started investing in single family residential real estate when they numbers made since, REITS have been investing in apartments and commercial real estate for ages - nothing new

lots of managers are paid fees based off of assets under mgmt - it incentive's good management - if they perform well others will invest
Posted by msutiger
Shreveport
Member since Jul 2008
69632 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 3:13 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/14/23 at 12:12 am
Posted by Koach K
Member since Nov 2016
4094 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 3:27 pm to
But what about good old garden variety fraud? I’m a janitor with a W2 and I scraped together some cash from god knows where to make the down payment. But if anything goes wrong with this overpriced house I ain’t fixing it because I’m perpetually cash-strapped
Posted by hubreb
Member since Nov 2008
1851 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 3:29 pm to
rates are are rising, the curve is inverting - makes their arb much harder....would imagine they will go back to only buying low hanging fruit...prior to recent years - the trade only worked in inner cities like Memphis where there has never been natural home ownership and property values are depressed

overhead for single family rentals is much greater than apartments or commercial real estate
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
31196 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

So under the terms of the contract the homeowner can back out too if home prices plummet?


Pretty sure the answer to this is yes, they would of course lose their earnest money. And a lot of times financing is delayed or doesn't pass and same situation...they lose their earnest money.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
31196 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

It's going to be interesting to see what kind of social policies and laws are enacted by Gen Z when they hold political power.


Not the way I'd describe it.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
31196 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

I'm sure that will be comforting to the homebuyer that has to deal with a deliberately inflated market.


There are lots of cities and states where housing costs are not as inflated as the "hot markets". At some point people to whom owning a house is that important will move there and things will normalize.

Just like I couldn't afford renting in a downtown Chicago high rise with a rooftop pool and gym out of college, I adjusted to what was realistic within my budget.
Posted by charlestonchief
Member since Sep 2006
588 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:18 pm to
I see you were being responsible!
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
29897 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:18 pm to
Caveat Emptor
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37140 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

they are able to buy the homes slightly above market value because they fund at what was libor + a spread between 140 and 200bps - much cheaper than what funding cost were for the average home buyer a few years back..


Correct... cause the Fed.

quote:

any this case, the fees are built into the beginning of the transaction - there is not enough spread or excess return in these transactions like you would have in a private equity trade with a 4-5 year horizon.


So if the fees are front-loaded... all the more reason to go on a buying spree... with that cheap fed-assisted cash.

quote:

they only started investing in single family residential real estate when they numbers made since, REITS have been investing in apartments and commercial real estate for ages - nothing new


I think people are used to corporate owned mutli-family... because it's multi-family. Few people ever thought they could buy an apartment complex, or wanted the hassle of one... even if they lived in a unit.

But people always felt they could buy single family for themselves... at least as a goal.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37140 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

rates are are rising, the curve is inverting - makes their arb much harder....would imagine they will go back to only buying low hanging fruit...prior to recent years - the trade only worked in inner cities like Memphis where there has never been natural home ownership and property values are depressed


But do you see them just slowing/stopping the pace of buying... or actually selling into market?

Stopping buying would be a welcome relief and allow people to catch up to the market... but if they don't want to sell that's just more pressure on inventory.
Posted by wadewilson
Member since Sep 2009
36576 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 5:01 pm to
quote:



There are lots of cities and states where housing costs are not as inflated as the "hot markets"


Those hot markets are where a lot of jobs are. Not a big deal if you're full or even part time WFH, but boomers want asses back in seats now.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37140 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

Just like I couldn't afford renting in a downtown Chicago high rise with a rooftop pool and gym out of college, I adjusted to what was realistic within my budget.


Which from prior posts we know was at least 15 years ago.

Look... it's fine to say, you can't afford to live downtown, so live 30 min away.

It's another to say... you can't afford to live downtow... live 2 hours away.
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
15481 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 5:48 pm to
There are a few Builders I work with who insist on their own contract, most though use the standard contract for our association, it has protections for both parties in the event one decides to cancel for whatever reason.

If the builder cancels and tries to retain any funds for changes, good luck selling it with a claim against refunding those outstanding.
Posted by IamPatman
In The Head Of My Enemies
Member since Nov 2019
435 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 8:05 pm to
I know...sorry TL;DR...unless you're interested to hear from an insider...
Being heavily involved in the building material supply industry for the majority of my 30 year professional career on the engineering and estimation side of things, I just have to disagree with anyone blaming this on governmental policy's, inflation, the fed, etc. It is pretty clear to me the majority problem is commodity pricing of building materials. While of course those other factors play a role, it is not the primary factor in the OP's story that started this thread. I say this because I have personal experience in the past few years under these current market conditions, doing design and estimation for builders pricing out their jobs. It used to be standard practice for lumberyards and building supply company's to hold their bid pricing for a maximum of 30 days (with some exceptions for extreme high volume builders). With the crazy cost fluctuations that have been occurring since the start of Covid, which created variables unseen before...those timeframes have moved to 15 day maximum price guarantees. And from my experience, the supplier margins stay pretty consistent. I have worked in this field in the South, West and Northeast and witnessed it to be basically the same process in all parts of the country and it is being driven by basic supply and demand. During the lockdown phases of Covid, the mills shut down reducing available product. Unaccounted for was the amount of people during a shutdown with time on their hands that then wanted to do tons of DIY and renovations. While summer of 2021 started to see a correction moving prices back down some, demand exploded thanks to those that had been holding off and pounced when they saw the market heading downward. This threw it all out of whack again, which is our current situation.

Point being, these homebuilders are well aware of the price fluctuations in advance. I have had bids that builders went to contract on 4-6 months (and longer) after they were provided with that bid without updating, having their cost of materials increasing anywhere from 35% - 75% in that timeframe. Some account for this possibility and some do not, so it depends on a particular builders ability to business plan. What you run into is, especially in these high volume markets, certain builders will price their bid on the low-end to win the bid while having an escape clause in fine print on the contract making it as pointless as a toilet paper hammock! However, in the markets that are predominately higher quality custom homes, these company's are factoring these variables in and not too concerned about losing the business, because they are already booked out for a year or more as it is anyway.

Something I have always thought about when it comes to contract pricing in a field largely affected by commodity pricing...why isn't there some sort of floating price clause built-in to protect everyone? Especially if there are project times that go 6 months or longer. The answer (from what I have seen) is the historical fluctuations have never been this severe and are currently unprecedented. Historically, they haven't been bad enough to create such severe loss and often worst case scenario was breaking even. So the reason for this is simple, they do not want to miss out on increasing their profits during a pricing downturn which happens almost 50% of the time...until recently. So basically...greed. Instead of maintaining professional integrity, they will sacrifice that for what has historically been a golden opportunity to pad their profits.

Just my personal observations from the inside.
Posted by NOLAVOL16
Member since Jan 2022
873 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 8:15 pm to
Excellent post

I would add that I also think these builders are raising prices to match the increase in existing home prices on top of the commodity increases.
Posted by The_Duke
Member since Nov 2016
3675 posts
Posted on 3/29/22 at 8:18 pm to
Been saying it from the start--

these builders are price gouging and taking advantage of the market.

I think we've seen the highs and it will come back down. I was looking at homes in Phoenix in December. The builder wanted 60k more for the same house 2 months later. I just decided to rent and wait for the crash. Not playing these games.
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 11Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram