Started By
Message

re: Headline of the day: “Debate over crack pipes holding up funding of US federal government”

Posted on 2/16/22 at 9:55 am to
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138181 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 9:55 am to
quote:

It all started when the Washington Free Beacon was the very first media outlet to run the story of the WH “funding crackpipes”. All other media outlets since then ran with that story without doing any research. That is where we are now and of course our politicians are falling for it.

You're still trying to pull this shite after you got bitch slapped the first time this came out? Hell, the document you posted proved you wrong.
Posted by adam330
Houston
Member since Nov 2019
10 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 9:56 am to
LOL what? how do you figure
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
72124 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Purchase equipment and supplies to enhance harm reduction efforts, such as:
o Harm reduction vending machine(s), including stock for machines;
o Infectious diseases testing kits (HIV, HBV, HCV, etc.);
o Medication lock boxes;
o FDA-approved overdose reversal medication (as well as higher dosages
now approved by FDA);
o Safe sex kits, including PrEP resources and condoms;
o Safe smoking kits/supplies;
o Screening for infectious diseases (HIV, sexually transmitted infections,
viral hepatitis);
o Sharps disposal and medication disposal kits;
o Substance test kits, including test strips for fentanyl and other synthetic
drugs;
o Syringes to prevent and control the spread of infectious diseases;
o Vaccination services (hepatitis A, hepatitis B vaccination); and
o Wound care management supplies.


One of the problems I have with this is the redundancy. We already have programs and funding for most of the shite on that list when it comes to poor people.

I'm assuming most of the drug addicts are poor and/or homeless. If they aren't already taking advantage of existing "vaccination services" or "wound care management" services that are afforded to them, what in the hell makes anyone believe they will be more likely to do so with a shiny, new multi-billion dollar plan?

Use the damn resources we already have in place in this country. Use the damn funds we have already allocated for those resources. Manage those resources. Do not create more redundant bullshite for the sake of more spending.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
35909 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 9:59 am to
quote:

alcohol swab, lip balm, and othet materials to promote clean hygene


I can see the press conference now...

Reporter: "Sir, does this funding and these kits not enable and encourage illicit drug use?"

Biden: "Maybe, but let me talk about how we're shutting down the chapped lips epidemic in this country."

Pauses for a second, and then

This post was edited on 2/16/22 at 10:00 am
Posted by Steadyhands
Slightly above I-10
Member since May 2016
7125 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 9:59 am to
quote:

Oh, well then it's ok then. My bad fellas. Here i was thinking the government was funding crack pipes and syringes, but silly me, they are just funding organizations and telling those organizations specifically what they are allowed to fund


Exactly. If this works, then the excuse of just paying the prostitute for her time and company should fly.
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
31855 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 10:01 am to
quote:

I can guarantee you the spleen or any of the other ones here have never looked at it that way.

"Omg the right worries about the dumbest things!"

Well stop bringing dumb shite to the table




agreed. i would wager that Sao, Spleen, C on Z, etc. don't want dudes dunking on girls in sports, don't want people to be harmed using drugs, or think all white people cause all problems that black people suffer from today.

i'm confident that they don't believe all of that 100%, but they for some reason feel the need to call out the other side for pushing back.

look, there's a ton of things on the right i disagree on. i'm happy to call them out on that. if we want honest conversation, we have to call out the bad actors on our own side.
This post was edited on 2/16/22 at 10:02 am
Posted by Abstract Queso Dip
Member since Mar 2021
5878 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 10:05 am to
Why have GOP people walked back on their holdouts from their original claims and nothing in the funding bill was changed?
This post was edited on 2/16/22 at 10:06 am
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 10:05 am to
quote:

, there's a ton of things on the right i disagree on. i'm happy to call them out on that. if we want honest conversation, we have to call out the bad actors on our own side.


That's the difference.

I dont ever see the left call out their own. They just stay silent in the corner when one of their own is doing something outlandish. The left has their lemmings trained well. I will give them that
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
94297 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 10:06 am to
Why wont you clowns just admit your boy is giving out crack pipes

Always in denial
Posted by adam330
Houston
Member since Nov 2019
10 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 10:07 am to
It really doesn't matter if its crack or meth. I don't see a single reason why my tax dollars need to pay for that
Posted by grizzlylongcut
Member since Sep 2021
14508 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 10:09 am to
quote:

The program targets all drug use. Conservatives honed in on the provision that allows grantees to purchase “safe smoking kits” and turned into a crack pipe debate.

We live in the dumbest timeline.



You "people" are just fricking sad.

I would love if all you "people" just moved your sorry asses to California and created your own little slice of shite completely cut off from the rest of this nation.
Posted by martiansgohome
Ankara
Member since Feb 2004
4682 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 10:17 am to
quote:

Go back a couple pages, and click on the link to the bill, specifically page 8. Then try again


You are wasting your time imo. They don't care about the truth. Instead of informed discourse, we get the parroting of talking points while dismissing the idea that others have different perspectives that while different, are still valid.

I guess it's outlandish to not want 5 year olds exposed to CRT through BLM, not want our elementary school girls to see male genitalia in their bathroom, not want tax dollars going to free crack pipes and syringes. Crazy right?!?
This post was edited on 2/16/22 at 10:20 am
Posted by Steadyhands
Slightly above I-10
Member since May 2016
7125 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 10:21 am to
quote:

quote:
so it’s odd crack became the boogeyman.

It all started when the Washington Free Beacon was the very first media outlet to run the story of the WH “funding crackpipes”. All other media outlets since then ran with that story without doing any research. That is where we are now and of course our politicians are falling for it.


Story time is over. Go sit at the kids table or join in the adult discussion. I don't know if Crack pipes are included or not. It sounds like they once were or still are in some states. Whatever, let's just use the term Crack pipes to refer to encouraging drug use and not doing anything to actually try to slow/prevent drug use. You don't see anything wrong with the fed government spending our money on drug related shite that does nothing towards stopping the problem? 2 parts there incase you missed it. One) unnecessary spending, which both sides are guilty, only the right ever tries to stop completely bs spending though. Two) the government is essentially encouraging continued drug use with this spending.

You're okay with that? Or better said, your leaders told you to be okay with that and you are blindly following as usual?
Posted by Abstract Queso Dip
Member since Mar 2021
5878 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 10:57 am to
LINK

This is a continuation of funding for the same exact stuff being done under previous administrations.

Whether or not it helps is a different argument all together.

We can discuss that but ideally you want people to recover so they don't end up in hospitals because that in and of itself is tremendously expensice and places a toll on our hospitals, er rooms, and ambulance services. Those costs are then passed onto paying customers
This post was edited on 2/16/22 at 10:59 am
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
31855 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 11:10 am to
quote:

This is a continuation of funding for the same exact stuff being done under previous administrations.


quote:

Improve access to treatment and recovery services to prevent the health, social, and economic consequences associated with opioid addiction and to enable individuals to achieve long-term recovery;

Target the availability and distribution of these drugs, and ensure the broad provision of overdose-reversing drugs to save lives;

Strengthen public health data reporting and collection to improve the timeliness and specificity of data and to inform a real-time public health response as the epidemic evolves; Support cutting-edge research that advances our understanding of pain and addiction, leads to the development of new treatments, and identifies effective public health interventions to reduce opioid-related health harms; and

Advance the practice of pain management to enable access to high-quality, evidence-based pain care that reduces the burden of pain for individuals, families, and society while also reducing the inappropriate use of opioids and opioid-related harms.


None of those included giving more drugs to people and/or doing things that encourage the use of (no matter how much more sanitary the methods may be.)

quote:

We can discuss that but ideally you want people to recover so they don't end up in hospitals because that in and of itself is tremendously expensice and places a toll on our hospitals, er rooms, and ambulance services. Those costs are then passed onto paying customers


And I agree with that. I, in no way, think you or Spleen want people to keep using hard drugs and/or for them to suffer or be a burden on the medical system. I think you’re making a good faith argument. This is my attempt at one back.

Yes of course people using HARD drugs illicitly is a net negative for everybody. The politicians on the right are simply saying that this sort of funding may stop the spread of STDs, but it’s encouraging the use to continue.

I’m not a cold man. I care about all people and view them as God’s vivid and beautiful creation, with our warts and all. But enabling bad behavior in the name of perpetual charity/welfare has been a failed experiment of chasing our tails for 60+ years.

I believe in charity. I’m not in favor of ending welfare. I’m in favor of ending perpetual welfare. I believe in the carrot, but you also have to believe in the stick.
Posted by crewdepoo
Hogwarts
Member since Jan 2015
10900 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 11:46 am to
quote:

So taxpayers are supposed to be paying for junkies to have a clean way to smoke their crack, shoot their heroin and then also pay for a way for them to treat themselves if they overdose?
The idea with the clean needles is to prevent aids, which is more costly to tax payers than a needle.

I assume it’s something similar with the pipes
Posted by TROLA
BATON ROUGE
Member since Apr 2004
14445 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 11:49 am to
quote:

They aren’t actually providing anything except grant money to local agencies. The things you listed are on the approved list of expenditures the local agencies can use the grant money for. Meth smoking is a bigger epidemic than crack is, so it’s odd crack became the boogeyman.


The mental gymnastics used here is heroic in effort
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
72124 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Advance the practice of pain management to enable access to high-quality, evidence-based pain care that reduces the burden of pain for individuals, families, and society while also reducing the inappropriate use of opioids and opioid-related harms.

This bit is complete bullshite since it was the Fed that created/exacerbated the opioid black market by implementing blanket regulations of pain clinics that ultimately saw many people with legitimate needs cut off over night. The Fed forced those people into the black market which directly led to the boom in fentanyl and fake opioid pills that we are now being told is an epidemic that must be controlled.
Posted by Abstract Queso Dip
Member since Mar 2021
5878 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 12:05 pm to
The epidemic or whatever you want to call it started with OXY and lax regulation for marketing materials by Purdue pharma in the late 90s. Pretty good docudramas and documentaries available for you to watch. One features a pharmacy baw in Louisiana.

Pain management clinics shouldn't exist IMO. They are fronts to get people hooked on drugs and then forcing them to come back into the clinic for more "pain management".
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
57051 posts
Posted on 2/16/22 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

This is a continuation of funding for the same exact stuff being done under previous administrations.



Nothing in that link states "smoking devices". Try again.

quote:

We can discuss that but ideally you want people to recover so they don't end up in hospitals because that in and of itself is tremendously expensice and places a toll on our hospitals, er rooms, and ambulance services


Correct. Ideally we want people to recover and kick the habit. Giving them crack pipes and syringes does not address any of that.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram