- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/18/24 at 5:22 pm to boxcarbarney
It's because people don't like to be jerked around by bullshite.
Posted on 9/18/24 at 6:17 pm to OldManRiver
quote:
1) She has a rare condition called Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH), which is described as "a rare, acquired, life-threatening disease of the blood. The disease is characterized by destruction of red blood cells, blood clots, and impaired bone marrow function. PNH is closely related to aplastic anemia".
2) The vaccines given were for "tetanus, meningitis, and pneumonia"
Why she had to have vaccines for blood cancer treatment is a question I can't answer, but this is very much a 1-million result of someone with an extremely rare condition
1) PNH cure is allogenic bone marrow transplant, its requires a several months long regimen of things that essentially eradicate your immune system. other non-curative treatments are immune modulators milder which also leave you compromised to a lesser extent.
2) ~ 15% of people die within 1 year of the curative treatment. if they didnt 'require' the vaccines it would be more like 100s of lawsuits instead of 1. 100s of lawsuits over irresponsible doctors causing horrible deaths from things we can cheaply, effectively, and safely prevent. easily orders of magnitude difference in risk vs benefit assessment.
Think of it more from the doctors perspective... would you start a long duration high risk regimen knowing the patient is not willing to participate in the first steps of the regimen?
say hypothetically the treatment is russian roulette... options are revolver with 2 rounds, 1 round, or no rounds? Hint: Doc is not letting you pick the 2 rounds gun just because you are feeling lucky. There better be an exceptionally convincing argument to do so and random chance vaccine injury without known contraindications is less than entertainable reasoning.
This post was edited on 9/18/24 at 6:56 pm
Posted on 9/18/24 at 6:33 pm to GumboPot
Glad to see I'm not the only one exhausted by the endless conspiracies coming from the poli-board types.
Eta- also a bit surprised not to see the terms "blackrock" or "AIPAC" pop up yet.
Eta- also a bit surprised not to see the terms "blackrock" or "AIPAC" pop up yet.
This post was edited on 9/18/24 at 6:34 pm
Posted on 9/18/24 at 6:49 pm to 632627
quote:
Glad to see I'm not the only one exhausted by the endless conspiracies coming from the poli-board types.
Apparently there’s no cure for these that are ate up with the dumbass…
Popular
Back to top


1





