- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:27 pm to chewstick
That isn’t at all what he said. The data clearly shows those in non-risk categories could have continued on as normal and done their part to not put this much strain on the economic health of our country.
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:28 pm to chewstick
quote:
These people should be fighting for sick pay, healthcare and rent freezes.
Have you thought that through carefully? Do you think the government can just print money indefinitely without dire consequences? Are you familiar with the term hyperinflation?Are you concerned about the deaths resulting from unemployment, poverty, lost hope, depression etc may actually exceed the deaths caused by this virus? Are you familiar with the unintended consequences? Do you realize how International economic pressures have historically led to world wars and/or other unintended calmities?
Wouldn't it make FAR MORE sense to quarantine the elderly and high risk Americans, take sensible precautions, and resume American life before the cure becomes far worse than the disease? Can't we as a mature society live with a certain reasonable amount of risk? Aren't these questions worth discussing RATIONALLY?



Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:30 pm to chewstick
Found another person who is still receiving his paycheck. Just let everyone else go broke and lose everything so some lardass that drinks 10 gallons of coke everyday, and could die from a heart attack at any moment, can feel safe from a.virus - right?
This post was edited on 4/19/20 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:30 pm to Golfer
I think your giving him too much credit. Maybe the data does clearly show that, or maybe it doesn’t. I wouldn’t know before seeing said data that hasn’t yet been posted in this thread. As of now, that’s like your opinion, man.
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:36 pm to Lsupimp
I’m not saying the government should just print the money. I’m saying that even if we do go back to work in a time of extreme uncertainty (despite what fake fox news data shows, this is indeed a time of extreme uncertainty) then we are putting ourselves in the exact same position as before. How do we avoid it?
Yes i would love to talk RATIONALLY with you, but I am bombarded with people who believe they know more than doctors and scientists about how we should proceed.
When we go back to work how do we keep people from getting sick and spreading this disease?
Yes i would love to talk RATIONALLY with you, but I am bombarded with people who believe they know more than doctors and scientists about how we should proceed.
When we go back to work how do we keep people from getting sick and spreading this disease?
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:38 pm to Lsupimp
So we should quarantine people who are elderly/ high risk? When does this slippery slope end?? How do i know if i am high risk if i can’t afford to go to the doctor? How do i quarantine myself at home if my job will be gone when im healthy again?
This post was edited on 4/19/20 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:45 pm to chewstick
quote:
How do i know if i am high risk if i can’t afford to go to the doctor?
You don’t magically get hypertension and diabetes in the last 6 weeks.
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:47 pm to chewstick
quote:So, we should instead quarantine every one?
So we should quarantine people who are elderly/ high risk? When does this slippery slope end??

quote:Take that up with the ACA.
How do i know if i am high risk if i can’t afford to go to the doctor?
quote:You are all over the place.
How do i quarantine myself at home if my job will be gone when im healthy again?
The protestors are protesting so that people can get back to work.
What exactly are you bitching about? They aren’t protesting for enough of what YOU want?
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:50 pm to Golfer
What if I magically got it 6 years ago? My point is that not everybody knows everything about what they are lacking (OT in a nutshell).
Since we are having this very inspiring conversation about the plight of the working man, maybe my empathetic friends will agree when I say doctors/healthcare are prrrrreeeeety spensive right now. Maybe we should protest that?
Since we are having this very inspiring conversation about the plight of the working man, maybe my empathetic friends will agree when I say doctors/healthcare are prrrrreeeeety spensive right now. Maybe we should protest that?
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:52 pm to chewstick
quote:So, why don’t you go do that?
Maybe we should protest that?
These individuals are protesting to go back to work.
Does every protest have to cover every single thing or can they cover certain things?
This post was edited on 4/19/20 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:52 pm to chewstick
let’s clarify something: we will never be able to answer any of the questions surrounding what you deem “uncertainty”. We will never have all the answers. We will never have 350 million tests. We will never have enough ventilators.
And we cannot sit around waiting for those or certainty.
And we cannot sit around waiting for those or certainty.
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:54 pm to Scruffy
No, this conversation started because the OT, full of rich red blooded supermodels is so empathetic towards working class America that they want to open up America based on half wit pseudo science thereby risking the lives of people who simply do not make the cut in their eyes. We don't need these disgusting unhealthy people around.
So what about the undesirables that also are protesting for going back to work? Should they have stayed home and left the protesting to the healthy folks?
So what about the undesirables that also are protesting for going back to work? Should they have stayed home and left the protesting to the healthy folks?
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:56 pm to Scruffy
this dude is just a troll. he doesn’t want rational two sided discussion.
This post was edited on 4/19/20 at 1:56 pm
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:57 pm to chewstick
quote:
No, this conversation started because the OT, full of rich red blooded supermodels is so empathetic towards working class America that they want to open up America based on half wit pseudo science thereby risking the lives of people who simply do not make the cut in their eyes.

That is possibly one of the most pathetic things posted on here.
quote:What about them?
So what about the undesirables that also are protesting for going back to work?
quote:They can choose to do what they want.
Should they have stayed home and left the protesting to the healthy folks?

Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:57 pm to chewstick
As your Fox News reference (among others) demonstrates, we are living in highly divisive times. I believe we should approach this in a NON-IDEOLOGICAL manner and hope you are able to begin doing so soon.
Now I am going to tell you something that is likely to anger you. RISK IS PART OF THE HUMAN frickING CONDITION. Now read that two or three times until it sinks in. Plagues have been around for the entirety of human history. It is part of our experience. Knowing that, wouldn't it make more sense to apply a little non-hyperbolic cost/benefits analysis to this current Wuhan variety? Especially since, in the end, nobody gets out alive anyway? I mean, death is part of this ride around the sun. We know it's always just right around the corner and we decide to be audacious and brave anyway. We overcome our FEAR of risk.
Do we really want to live by anxiety and fear? Or do we want to have a more stoic approach based in reality. And while we look to science and medicine for rational guidance, do we really want to cede our liberty to scientists and physicians just because some of them have a really, really scary model? I say no.
We should quarantine those most at risk, be personally responsible, wear masks as needed, take reasonable precautions, continue to socially distance etc -AND get back to work as soon as possible. This does not have to be an "either/or" it can be a BOTH. We CAN do both. We don't have to live in the paralysis of a False Choice.
Let's live like Americans. Like our Fathers before us. Without Fear. With boldness and confidence.

Now I am going to tell you something that is likely to anger you. RISK IS PART OF THE HUMAN frickING CONDITION. Now read that two or three times until it sinks in. Plagues have been around for the entirety of human history. It is part of our experience. Knowing that, wouldn't it make more sense to apply a little non-hyperbolic cost/benefits analysis to this current Wuhan variety? Especially since, in the end, nobody gets out alive anyway? I mean, death is part of this ride around the sun. We know it's always just right around the corner and we decide to be audacious and brave anyway. We overcome our FEAR of risk.
Do we really want to live by anxiety and fear? Or do we want to have a more stoic approach based in reality. And while we look to science and medicine for rational guidance, do we really want to cede our liberty to scientists and physicians just because some of them have a really, really scary model? I say no.
We should quarantine those most at risk, be personally responsible, wear masks as needed, take reasonable precautions, continue to socially distance etc -AND get back to work as soon as possible. This does not have to be an "either/or" it can be a BOTH. We CAN do both. We don't have to live in the paralysis of a False Choice.
Let's live like Americans. Like our Fathers before us. Without Fear. With boldness and confidence.



Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:57 pm to Methuselah
Schools may should not be closed at all. The science is starting to indicate that Covid-19 spread from child to child is not like the flu at all and much much less common that initially thought.
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:58 pm to Klark Kent
quote:Hopefully.
this dude is just a troll.
That last post was up there. fricking crazy person.
Posted on 4/19/20 at 1:58 pm to Klark Kent
Ok, buddy. I'm a troll. That's rich coming from a place a like this.
So, yea let's open up America. Hundreds of thousands of people will die in 2 months, but frick it, they didn't deserve to live anyways.

So, yea let's open up America. Hundreds of thousands of people will die in 2 months, but frick it, they didn't deserve to live anyways.
Posted on 4/19/20 at 2:00 pm to chewstick
quote:
based on half wit pseudo science thereby risking the lives of people
You realize these models the "scientists and doctors", that were working for government, were completely wrong ? You don't seem to question the basis by which all of the ridiculous mitigation was based on. These wonderful "scientists and doctors" predicted a CAT 5 strike of the mainland US and Ordered mandatory evacuations of the entire US coastal areas, all b/c a tropical wave just formed off the coast of Africa. A CAT 1 later struck south of Brownsville and here we are.
Popular
Back to top
