- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fired IT employees sue LSU
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:55 am to teke184
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:55 am to teke184
quote:
Based on their salaries and the mention of legacy systems in Bankston’s statement, my guess is that they were hired to oversee a multi-year conversion of the legacy systems to something more modern and portable.
Typically, those kinds of jobs are contracted out via bidding rather than handed to a WAE hired by the agency / governor.
Could be, but those don't sound like project titles to me. They sound like administrator title. I might be wrong.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:55 am to Jim Rockford
quote:
. It uses the outdated programming language of COBOL
Ah yes. COBOL. I learned about this programming language in high school computer class when it was the hot new thing.
In 1986
I love my alma mater, but damn if it isn't embarrassing sometimes.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:58 am to LSUGrad9295
COBOL being old doesn’t make it useless.
The problem is more along the lines of “no one teaches it anymore” than anything else.
The problem is more along the lines of “no one teaches it anymore” than anything else.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 11:05 am to TigerCoon
quote:
Could be, but those don't sound like project titles to me. They sound like administrator title. I might be wrong.
Ballinger was specifically hired to lead LSUs modernization efforts. She brought the others along with her for the express purposes of being the team leaders for that project
The fact she had a team ready to join her at LSU experienced in SIS modernizations was part of the reason LSU was excited about hiring her
Posted on 4/25/19 at 11:08 am to Tigeralum2008
If this is the case, then the school fricked up by hiring them directly rather than having them put together a firm to bid for the process.
State employees are subject to different rules than contractors.
State employees are subject to different rules than contractors.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 2:22 pm to CarRamrod
quote:quote:
What do you base that assertion on?
common sense.
OK, so basically your own opinion
quote:quote:
Not sure what industry you work in or what level of professionals you work with
i work on projects globally.
OK, but I assume not in an industry where job locations and duration are very fluid?
quote:quote:
The rent where they work and live there at least 4 days a week, often more, and commute to their family home whenever they can (distance impacts the frequency). Most were texas to Louisiana but one is Colorado to Louisiana. A couple of the Texas to Louisiana were Permian basin to Lafayette area. People do this for various reasons, usually kid/school related.
do you understand laws state, to have this job, you must live in LA, and register your vehicle in LA. This is a job for a state funded school, not some corporate company. I dont see how you dont see the difference.
I get that is a state law, a fairly recent one though in place prior to the hiring. I suspect no one would have had any heartburn if the law only required they register any vehicle they primarily used in the state, they lived here, had an address here and paid utilities and state taxes here in a manner that would have qualified them to pay in state tuition at LSU by the time that they were let go.
quote:I see the difference but these were people who came from the private sector (IIRC) and did not know about the state law, I honestly think the folks that hired them at LSU may not have known either.
I dont see how you dont see the difference.
My understanding here is that these folks were hired, the top person in particular, because of their expertise in the particular data migration that the job was tasked with.
What I don't get is why LSU didn't contract these people instead of direct hiring them. Probably due to some state law as well? That type of one time migration would have almost always been handled by outsourcing in the private sector. Outsourcing is much more effective for limited scope projects like this.
MY whole point here is that LSU definitely dropped the ball if they did not spell out for these employees the expectation s they had. And the state of Louisiana is being ridiculous if the expect someone to register a car in Louisiana that never even makes it to this state. Particularly if it is being driven by someone else in another state. By Louisiana's own laws, if a person here did that, registered there car in another state and drove it here for more than ten days (I think), they would be in violation of the law.
The primary thing I think the lawsuit is seeking is not having to repay the moving expenses for a move they undertook in good faith due to lack of information presented by LSU.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 2:25 pm to teke184
quote:
If this is the case, then the school fricked up by hiring them directly rather than having them put together a firm to bid for the process.
State employees are subject to different rules than contractors.
This is the part I just don't get. This is the epitome of a job that screams out contractor. Limited scope limited duration job. Unless they were thinking the top person would eventually head up administration of the new system, but that seems like a stretch.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 2:41 pm to LSUGrad9295
quote:
Ah yes. COBOL. I learned about this programming language in high school computer class when it was the hot new thing.
In 1986
That was probably COBOL-85, the latest release at the time. I think there were significant compatibility issues between it and previous editions.
COBOL itself has been around since 1959. By 1970 it was the most widely used programing language in the world.
I'm not a programmer (well, not a high level programmer) or computer scientist, this just from my reading about systems and programming languages so anyone please correct anything I have wrong. I did have a couple of friends in computer science in the early 80s when I took Fortran as part of my engineering curriculum. Those guys hated Cobol, but mostly because the compiling took so long back then and one syntax error could cost you loads of time.
The last COBOL update was 2014, I believe. I suspect they likely have compatibility issues everytime a new standard comes out as well. I do not know how common it is anymore.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 3:12 pm to mdomingue
They can attempt to argue that but it is hard to win considering that one of the people in question got paid about $50k in moving expenses and didn’t move.
Basically, “show me the money”. Bring up bills showing where you picked up your household and moved it to Louisiana and you can keep as much as you are proven to have spent in a good faith effort.
Basically, “show me the money”. Bring up bills showing where you picked up your household and moved it to Louisiana and you can keep as much as you are proven to have spent in a good faith effort.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 4:42 pm to teke184
quote:
They can attempt to argue that but it is hard to win considering that one of the people in question got paid about $50k in moving expenses and didn’t move.
I don't know those details or exactly what was agreed to. People play games with things like "moving allowances" in order to pay people what are effectively signing bonuses in order to avoid certain approvals they would otherwise need.
But I can see excessive numbers like that being difficult to explain.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 6:20 pm to mdomingue
Call me old fashioned, but if you CIO cannot be at work everyday when they are suppose to, then they should not be CIO especially when you adopt a policy of no work from home for your people but exempt yourself.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 6:34 pm to mdomingue
quote:
I see the difference but these were people who came from the private sector (IIRC) and did not know about the state law, I honestly think the folks that hired them at LSU may not have known either.
No, they didn't come from the private sector. They were all brought in by Daniel Layzell. He worked with them at another university previously and brought in a bunch of people he knew from that job.
Not saying that they would've known or that Daniel knew about this rule. Just clarifying their previous job.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 6:45 pm to mdomingue
quote:
This is the part I just don't get. This is the epitome of a job that screams out contractor. Limited scope limited duration job. Unless they were thinking the top person would eventually head up administration of the new system, but that seems like a stretch.
The Workday transition was a 3-5 year project. After which they were to lead transitions into metadata collected various university systems. I can see where it would be cheaper for the university to make direct hires rather than contractors.
Also state law limits contracts to 1 fiscal year (I think they get away w multi year contracts by issuing new POs each year). It also requires a frickton of metrics, reports, and approvals. This being a multi year transition would make contract work untenable
Posted on 4/25/19 at 7:08 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
quote:
Bankston suspects that LSU hierarchy wanted to get rid of the Illinois IT specialists because of their criticism of the university relying on an IBM mainframe that is no longer supported by IBM and must be repaired with parts found on eBay. It uses the outdated programming language of COBOL. The 43-year-old computer system handles LSU’s tuition, payrolls, student services and other critical functions.
But LSU has an awesome lazy river.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 7:13 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
The 43-year-old computer system handles LSU’s tuition, payrolls, student services and other critical functions.
That was fancy back when I was in college
Posted on 4/25/19 at 7:31 pm to Tigeralum2008
The state agency I mentioned upthread did their transition from the legacy system to the new system in a series of rollouts across multiple years.
I'm not privy to the contract details as to whether it was agreed to in full or done in parts but the nature of the contract meant that the contractor had the state by the balls once a conversion had started.
The state could have walked from subsequent contracts but then they would be in a new world of shite between sunk cost on an abandoned system and then the problem of trying to migrate data from the failed system back into the legacy system.
I'm not privy to the contract details as to whether it was agreed to in full or done in parts but the nature of the contract meant that the contractor had the state by the balls once a conversion had started.
The state could have walked from subsequent contracts but then they would be in a new world of shite between sunk cost on an abandoned system and then the problem of trying to migrate data from the failed system back into the legacy system.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 8:35 pm to Jim Rockford
They aquired that system when I was an undergrad. It suxed then.
They could probably replace that with a laptop.
They could probably replace that with a laptop.
This post was edited on 4/25/19 at 8:38 pm
Posted on 4/26/19 at 7:49 am to lsubaseball78
quote:
Not saying that they would've known or that Daniel knew about this rule. Just clarifying their previous job.
Thanks for that.
Popular
Back to top

1








