re: Feds seal Alton Sterling autopsy results

How many times did we hear shots? 4 right? So when would he have shot himself? 1st shot? I mean if Alton fired first and then the cop fired 1 shot back, someone in the PD/ DOJ should be fired for not releasing that info sooner.

Alton would of either fired 1st or the 3rd shot, but a lot of people criticized the police for firing 4 times so that 4th shot would of been more than justified had Alton fired 3rd.

quote:

---

I put them up there with westboro "baptist church".

---

Thanks, needed a good laugh.

quote:

---

gary chambers maybe?

---

if they had a video exonerating the officers and showing a gun in Sterlings hand no [protestor or Gary Chambers would ever change their tune...its always someone elses fault.

quote:

---

I'm going to go with blood loss/cardiac arrest due to gun shot wound. Does anything else really matter?

---

Very short sighted.

gunpowder residue on his hand would prove he fired at the officers w/ the gun in his pocket.

placement and angle of bullet entry wounds would show where and how the shots came from. If there's more bullets in his body than the number fired by police officers again proves he fired his weapon.


Lynch sealed this only to supress evidence that is contrary to the media narrative her pimp pushes.

quote:

---

I think "melancholy and the infinite sadness" might have been close to that, since it was a double CD. Do you think he was selling Smashing Pumpkins albums?

---

maybe down south hustlas or all eyez on me. that was 2 disc

Sealing it keeps the agenda and the "Story of being shot because he's Black" going.

And i would have to think this is highly unethical by DOJ, and that Sunshine laws were made for shite like this, were Feds try to keep shite from Public.

I would hope every paper in La, would be putting in request after request and filing a suit, or to block the feds refusal to had over the public information.

Let's remember, CNN put a picture of Zimmerman up, whited it like crazy and you couldn't see a ding or scratch, Fox took same picture and showed it as is, and you saw the gash and blood. It changed a shite load of peoples opinions when the actual photo, un doctored was shown.


You can keep an agenda or fiction going by hiding the truth.

quote:

---

... died from multiple gunshot wounds to the back and chest.

---

I have read this (shot in the back) but from what I saw of the video, it did not look like he was laying face down and was shot. Granted, I did not study the video or watch it more than 2/3 times.

Can someone enlighten me on where this "shot in the back" is coming from?

He tried to get up after being shot the first time. Then officer that was behind him shot his arse again.
I would comply the first time, but IF I didn't and got shot, you can bet your arse I'd comply from then on out.

quote:

---

The meltdown if this were true would be epic..........EPIC!!!!!

---

Respectfully disagree. It would be brushed aside as non-news because it wouldn't fit the narrative. The same way the Michael Brown autopsy should have dispelled the "Hands Up - Don't Shoot" myth, yet somehow didn't.

They have their story. The truth will not interfere.

quote:

---

They have their story. The truth will not interfere.

---

winner winner chicken dinner