Started By
Message

re: FBI: more killed by hammers than rifles

Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:03 pm to
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84775 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

Big gun advocate here but that is hard to believe.




Of course it's hard to believe because the OP is fake news.

Equating hammers to all blunt objects would be as disingenuous as saying rifle kills = all gun kills.
This post was edited on 8/11/19 at 5:29 pm
Posted by Jones
Member since Oct 2005
90481 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:03 pm to
I just think it's funny when they try to argue a subject they dont know dick about.

I mean if I dont know jack shite about guns, the last place I'm going to argue this subject is a message board with 99% male posters from the South.

He should go to Democrat underground. He would be revered there probably
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84775 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

You're more likely to be killed by a hammer than in a mass shooting


You're also more likely to be killed by someone you know than by a stranger. What's your point?
Posted by Jones
Member since Oct 2005
90481 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:05 pm to
He worded it wrong. More deaths from blunt objects
Posted by TheIndulger
Member since Sep 2011
19239 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

If you actually worry about being in a mass shooting you're retarded


I personally don't worry about it in my life, but it is a very real and tangible fear. There are people who concealed carry for that reason.

Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84775 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

He worded it wrong. More deaths from blunt objects




He worded it the way he wanted to stretch the truth.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134846 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

Never said I was an expert. Just was trying to get across that guns are far more deadly that a fricking hammer.

No one was arguing potential lethality. We were discussing actual lethality via use. Hammers were more lethal than rifles.

quote:

I can outrun a hammer, can't outrun a bullet.

Tell you what, let's see if you can out run the hammer I'll throw at you.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134846 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

You're also more likely to be killed by someone you know than by a stranger. What's your point?


Stop creating boogeymen based on nothing but emotion
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134846 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:17 pm to
He thinks shooting a crack barrel 20 gauge gives him a valid opinion on gun control
Posted by geauxtigahs87
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2008
26259 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

No one was arguing potential lethality. We were discussing actual lethality via use.

Dude thinks potential deaths are a bigger concern than actual deaths.

Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
82952 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:19 pm to
quote:

Tell you what, let's see if you can out run the hammer I'll throw at you.
how far are you away? I'm nimble here.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134846 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

how far are you away? I'm nimble here.



Doesn't matter. You're faster than the hammer, right?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84775 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

Stop creating boogeymen based on nothing but emotion


To be fair, the only thing most people give a shite about is random violence, despite the absolute rarity of it.
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
82952 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:31 pm to
Not in a race, have a far better chance of dodging your hammer than I do your bullet.
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

Im pro 2A and always will be


No, you aren't.

quote:

quote:
 I think the reason for the second amendment has been obviated by technology. We can’t fight, with guns, a government that has nuclear weapons, and we darn sure are not going to let citizens own nukes.


This exactly.



This proves you aren't.


quote:

That is simply not the case in a majority of instances. Even the militart grade arms civilians do have isnt enough to defeat an entire well trained army or naval deployment


You suck at history too.

quote:

I agree with the spirit of the 2A, but in practicality the only thing keeping government in check is our votes.


The 2nd Amendment gives teeth to our votes
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134846 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

To be fair, the only thing most people give a shite about is random violence, despite the absolute rarity of it.


Right. They don't care about the consistent violence in places like Chicago and Baltimore.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
140462 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:44 pm to
It's the "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" mantra.

No one cares if a dope dealer gets shot by one of his everyday rockheads when one-day the rockstar is out of funds and needs to Rob for his fix.
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
82952 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

They don't care about the consistent violence in places like Chicago and Baltimore
that's because its a criminal killing a criminal most times.

Like you care either.
Posted by Skillet
Member since Aug 2006
107558 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:48 pm to
pic of a hammer


"hammer"
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69902 posts
Posted on 8/11/19 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

I can outrun a hammer



Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram