- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fauci and Covid Vaccine During Pregnancy
Posted on 8/18/26 at 9:30 am to STEVED00
Posted on 8/18/26 at 9:30 am to STEVED00
quote:Thats a completely different premise than your OP trying to make claims the miscarriage rage was 86%
reviewed and still feel like they were pressured/coerced/shamed for no real benefit and questionable results. Does that make you upset?
You can be upset about how people were coerced, doesn’t bother me a bit. Pedaling and regurgitating false information that should be clearly false to anyone who has common sense or take 1 minute to confirm the data does “bother me” and should bother everyone, especially considering politicians are publicly broadcasting the lies
I thought we didn’t like lying politicians?
1
Posted on 8/18/26 at 9:35 am to lsupride87
I made a claim that the data telling people to vaccinate was questionable and I still believe that. Not sure why you feel the need to continually stand up for it. The data still doesn’t back up the recommendation and certainly didn’t at the time
I saw close friends and family members shamed for their decisions so yeah I’m salty.
I saw close friends and family members shamed for their decisions so yeah I’m salty.
This post was edited on 8/18/26 at 9:37 am
Posted on 8/18/26 at 9:36 am to STEVED00
This again? 
Posted on 8/18/26 at 9:38 am to STEVED00
quote:How? Your entire study you posted was shown to be a bogus annd bastardized interpretation and it was laid out and shown to you and now you bury your head and deny it? What is questionable about any of the now 100s of thousands of data points?
I made a claim that the data telling people to vaccinate was questionable and I still believe that
Look, you are no different than the Covidians that pushed false info to support lockdowns. You refuse to accept the actual data about the vaccine just as they did with the virus
This post was edited on 8/18/26 at 9:39 am
Posted on 8/18/26 at 9:41 am to lsupride87
That was the data available at the time. The data saying they met the standard miscarriage rate included those who got the vaccine late in pregnancy.
What do I refuse to accept? That it didn’t do what they said it would do? Is that even up for debate at this point.
My point from the beginning that it was bullshite that they pushed this vaccine on people that were of no risk for the actual disease in order to protect grandma which we found it later that it didn’t actually prevent transmission so grandma wasn’t even protected.
What do I refuse to accept? That it didn’t do what they said it would do? Is that even up for debate at this point.
My point from the beginning that it was bullshite that they pushed this vaccine on people that were of no risk for the actual disease in order to protect grandma which we found it later that it didn’t actually prevent transmission so grandma wasn’t even protected.
This post was edited on 8/18/26 at 9:45 am
Posted on 8/18/26 at 9:48 am to STEVED00
quote:NO
That was the data available at the time. The data saying they met the standard miscarriage rate included those who got the vaccine late in pregnancy.
The study followed through and they can and did give miscarriage rates based on which trimester the shot was given…..
quote:You refuse to accept that the vaccine was safe and actually effective
What do I refuse to accept? That it didn’t do what they said it would do?
Many people do
It’s simple, if one can’t accept the following statements they can’t accept facts :
Covid was not a dangerous virus for the majority of people
And
The Covid vaccine was safe and effective
The days overwhelmingly supports the above two facts. That has nothing to do with how they rolled out the vaccine or how they messaged it
This post was edited on 8/18/26 at 9:49 am
Posted on 8/18/26 at 9:49 am to STEVED00
quote:
That was the data available at the time. The data saying they met the standard miscarriage rate included those who got the vaccine late in pregnancy.
This is what you said in your OP:
quote:
If you look at the study, women who took the vaccine in the 1st trimester had an extremely high rate of miscarriage, much higher than normal but the % came down to the normal rate of miscarriage when you factored in all the women who received their vaccine in the 2nd and 3rd trimester.
That's not true. It's a misreading of the results. Women who were vaccinated in the first trimester were at no higher risk of miscarriage than women who were vaccinated later or not vaccinated at all.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 9:50 am to lsupride87
quote:
The Covid vaccine was safe and effective The days overwhelmingly supports the above two facts. That has nothing to do with how they rolled out the vaccine or how they messaged it
Posted on 8/18/26 at 9:51 am to STEVED00
Yeh, laugh as you are the one that has a pre-k level interpretation of a study in your OP….
Posted on 8/18/26 at 9:51 am to STEVED00
Why are you okay with being wrong and sharing wrong information?
You got got. Own it and stop misleading others.
You got got. Own it and stop misleading others.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 9:55 am to Ingeniero
quote:
A total of 35,691 v-safe participants 16 to 54 years of age identified as pregnant. Injection-site pain was reported more frequently among pregnant persons than among nonpregnant women, whereas headache, myalgia, chills, and fever were reported less frequently. Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) were pregnancy losses and 712 (86.1%) were live births (mostly among participants vaccinated in the third trimester). Adverse neonatal outcomes included preterm birth (in 9.4%) and small size for gestational age (in 3.2%); no neonatal deaths were reported. Although not directly comparable, calculated proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in persons vaccinated against Covid-19 who had a completed pregnancy were similar to incidences reported in studies involving pregnant women that were conducted before the Covid-19 pandemic. Among 221 pregnancy-related adverse events reported to the VAERS, the most frequently reported event was spontaneous abortion (46 cases).
In the results section at the top of the report, they mention the 86% came from the 827.
This post was edited on 8/18/26 at 9:57 am
Posted on 8/18/26 at 9:58 am to lsupride87
Gotcha. It’s clearly safe and effective
Posted on 8/18/26 at 9:58 am to STEVED00
quote:Dude what are you doing?
In the results section at the top of the report, they mention the 86% came from the 827.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 10:00 am to lsupride87
If that was an in inconsequential stat, why put it in the results section.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 10:01 am to STEVED00
quote:You cant be helped here
If that was an in inconsequential stat, why put it in the results section.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 10:03 am to lsupride87
Ok. Plus it’s also coming out in the Fauci hearings that other experts were questioning the decision where it comes to pregnancy and the vaccine.
You can laugh but personally witnessing close friends being publicly coerced and even shamed by other close friends on this topic hit different. There was NO benefit to young and healthy people to get this vaccine bc they were at essentially zero risk of anything serious. The people mentioned above were all young and healthy.
You can laugh but personally witnessing close friends being publicly coerced and even shamed by other close friends on this topic hit different. There was NO benefit to young and healthy people to get this vaccine bc they were at essentially zero risk of anything serious. The people mentioned above were all young and healthy.
This post was edited on 8/18/26 at 10:09 am
Posted on 8/18/26 at 10:06 am to STEVED00
It’s actually terrifying. You are an educated person and you refuse , or simply can’t comprehend, EXTRMELY EASY to interpret data
And now you will continue to spread it to as many people as you can.
And now you will continue to spread it to as many people as you can.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 10:09 am to STEVED00
I'm telling you that the statistic you're claiming is not correct. The study that's being passed around claiming an 80%+ miscarriage rate does not say what you think it does.
82% of women did not miscarry after being vaccinated in the first trimester. Lots of those pregnancies were still ongoing, meaning they did not miscarry. The only way for a pregnancy to be "completed" before full term is to have a miscarriage (in this context)
Put another way, imagine someone were doing a study on those big alien concussion helmets that football players wear. In the study, 100 guys are wearing them. During the study period, 10 guys retire, 8 of which were due to concussions, 2 had a bad knee or something.
90 guys are still playing football, 8 concussion retired, 2 bad knee retired. Is the career-ending concussion rate with the helmets 8/10 or 8/100?
82% of women did not miscarry after being vaccinated in the first trimester. Lots of those pregnancies were still ongoing, meaning they did not miscarry. The only way for a pregnancy to be "completed" before full term is to have a miscarriage (in this context)
Put another way, imagine someone were doing a study on those big alien concussion helmets that football players wear. In the study, 100 guys are wearing them. During the study period, 10 guys retire, 8 of which were due to concussions, 2 had a bad knee or something.
90 guys are still playing football, 8 concussion retired, 2 bad knee retired. Is the career-ending concussion rate with the helmets 8/10 or 8/100?
Posted on 8/18/26 at 10:15 am to lsupride87
It’s terrifying that you don’t see we were lied to and manipulated for “safety”. Maybe I misread but it was also misleading to begin with and it certainly wasn’t clear. When the recommendation came out the data set wasn’t even complete.
Young healthy people should not have been vaccinated bc it provided no benefit bc there was no risk AND didn’t stop transmission.
Young healthy people should not have been vaccinated bc it provided no benefit bc there was no risk AND didn’t stop transmission.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 10:15 am to STEVED00
quote:Where is the lie here?
It’s terrifying that you don’t see we were lied to and manipulated for “safety”.
quote:It without a shadow of a doubt helped to stop transmission
AND didn’t stop transmission.
This post was edited on 8/18/26 at 10:17 am
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News