- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Father (Not Guilty) of killing drunk driver who killed his sons.Update
Posted on 8/19/14 at 11:16 am to LNCHBOX
Posted on 8/19/14 at 11:16 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
By law
By law you can go to jail longer for selling a harmless substance than you can for sexually abusing or killing someone. So obviously some laws are a joke.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 11:17 am to RandySavage
quote:
By law you can go to jail longer for selling a harmless substance than you can for sexually abusing or killing someone. So obviously some laws are a joke.
You're too stupid to talk to. Please have the last word so we can move on.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 11:17 am to Tigerlaff
There's a part of me that says this is perfectly ok. On the other hand, I think over the past dozen centuries or so, we've become civilized to the extent where this constitutes a step towards anarchy - therefore not acceptable.
I think we all carry a reptilian response mechanism deep inside us that we suppress everyday. I think at times it's useful, but not this time.
I think we all carry a reptilian response mechanism deep inside us that we suppress everyday. I think at times it's useful, but not this time.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 11:19 am to RandySavage
I'm just catching the tail end of this argument, but if your posts are similar to this
quote:then I'm going to assume you're not doing too well.
lol, protecting murderers and criminals is "civilized" now? Got it, thanks.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 11:21 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
You're too stupid to talk to
So are you saying what I posted is untrue or do you disagree with it?
Posted on 8/19/14 at 11:23 am to RandySavage
quote:
So are you saying what I posted is untrue or do you disagree with it?
It's misleading for starters. First offense dealing isn't going to get you 20 years on it's own.
And I disagree with your whole premise in this thread. What the dad did should not be tolerated in a civilized society.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 11:27 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
And I disagree with your whole premise in this thread. What the dad did should not be tolerated in a civilized society
That's fine if that's how you feel. But killing someone kids due to negligence, selfishness, carelessness, stupidity etc... should be even less tolerated.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 11:33 am to RandySavage
quote:
lol, protecting murderers and criminals is "civilized" now? Got it, thanks.
We have a system in place where everyone is entitled to due process to determine guilt. At the time the driver was murdered there was purportedly no way to know that he was in fact guilty (i.e. there was no way to know that he was intoxicated).
The father lashed out at someone who really may not have been to blame for the accident at all. This is why we have a justice system in place. For all it's flaws it is better than going around and punishing who we think might probably be guilty. Or just shifting responsibility for our own actions onto other people which is what it seems like this father might have done.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 11:44 am to RandySavage
quote:
should be even less tolerated.
That's for courts to decide. At this point, we don't know, and we'll never know, what actually happened to cause the collision.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 11:49 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
That's for courts to decide. At this point, we don't know, and we'll never know, what actually happened to cause the collision.
Yeh we don't even know if the father killed him b/c he thought he was drunk. Based on some replies in this thread it wouldn't matter if he was sober.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 11:50 am to RandySavage
quote:by having them push a car down a country road at night? That's pretty fricking negligent.
But killing someone kids due to negligence,
Did you miss the part where the police said the father couldn't have been able to tell that the driver was intoxicated?
Posted on 8/19/14 at 11:55 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
Randy Savage
I don't know why anyone is wasting thoughts with this guy.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 12:11 pm to Artie Rome
I'm not saying what this dad did is right, but I could see myself doing the same thing. Especially if both my kids were killed.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 12:16 pm to LNCHBOX
Our prisons are already too crowded. I support the dad.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 12:19 pm to CootKilla
quote:
CootKillaI'm not saying what this dad did is right, but I could see myself doing the same thing. Especially if both my kids were killed.
I have an eleven year old girl and a twelve year old boy and I would never put them in that situation. The father was stupid. He should have just turned the pistol on himself if he wanted to punish someone.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 12:21 pm to iknowmorethanyou
quote:
Our prisons are already too crowded. I support the dad.
The dad can have the spot of the guy he killed. Everyone wins.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 12:22 pm to iknowmorethanyou
quote:
Our prisons are already too crowded. I support the dad.
I'll ask again since none of you dummies will answer... What is the driver was sober?
And the father should be put in prison for child endangerment.
Posted on 8/27/14 at 2:14 pm to Tigerlaff
Bump - was just found not guilty as per The Houston Chronicle.
Not guilty
quote:
ANGLETON, Texas - The jury returned a verdict Wednesday in the trial of a father accused of fatally shooting a drunken driver who killed his two young sons in a crash. David Barajas was found not guilty.
Both sides rested their cases Tuesday in a state district court in Angleton, with the defense calling just three witnesses. Barajas is accused of fatally shooting Jose Banda in December 2012 near Alvin, minutes after Banda hit a truck Barajas and his two sons were pushing after it ran out of gas. Twelve-year-old David Jr. and 11-year-old Caleb were killed.
Not guilty
This post was edited on 8/27/14 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 8/27/14 at 2:17 pm to idlewatcher
LINK
So what happened?
quote:
the defense said the evidence says something totally different; that Barajas never had time to run home, grab a gun, kill Banda, run back home and change his clothes. He had no gun residue on him. He was just trying to save his kids.
The defense says there is, "No evidence, circumstantial or direct evidence, that links David Barajas to the killing."
So what happened?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News