Started By
Message

re: Elon Musk:: Tesla cars to be fully autonomous by 2018

Posted on 1/10/16 at 9:35 pm to
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41903 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

Kind of embarrassing for Tesla that it's taken so long to hit this market. They'll be serious competition by the time they get around to introducing an affordable (to most Americans) electric car.



This has been the plan from day 1 and it has worked nearly flawlessly. Create a brand that can show the world that electric vehicles are viable. Fast, sexy, practical from a daily driver standpoint, affordable to a significant percentage of the population.

Once Tesla is established in the market, which it has been for sometime, start to bring the same technology and design to the masses and people will buy like fricking hot cakes.

Roadster --> Model S --> Model X --> Model 3.

I don't see how a reasonable person could disagree that his vision has worked pretty much perfectly.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

People aren't demanding their cars to be self-driving, for the most part.


I think once it's viable, it will take off like wildfire. Like most technology, it will free us up to be more productive or to be entertained.

I am positive there comes a day soon when car ownership will drop dramatically. Particularly in the more dense urban areas. No need for street parking, or long term parking lots. Just drop off/pick up zones.
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
29644 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

I don't see how a reasonable person could disagree that his vision has worked pretty much perfectly.


I do, since his company still isn't even close to free cash flow positive.
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
29644 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

people werent demanding that their phones have cameras 10-15 years ago either. once people start seeing this technology and how it frees you to be more productive with your time it will take off. Right now people dont have the option, so its not something that even crosses their mind. its going to take time obviously, but it will happen. Once its exclusively AI doing the work, travel time will be cut drastically, without a doubt. I cant wait.


Camera phones don't cost $20k+.
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
48185 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

I think once it's viable, it will take off like wildfire. Like most technology, it will free us up to be more productive or to be entertained.

I am positive there comes a day soon when car ownership will drop dramatically. Particularly in the more dense urban areas. No need for street parking, or long term parking lots. Just drop off/pick up zones.




if we can abolish the cab cartel, you could potentially have your car running "uber" service all day while you are working, then be back to pick you up 15 minutes before you get off of work. Need a burger from mcdonalds? order your food, you car picks it up right on time and drives it to you. its going to be amazing not being tied down to driving.
Posted by Nelson Biederman IV
New York, NY
Member since Apr 2014
638 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 9:49 pm to
This will never happen. It can't. From a security stand point it's just not feasible.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
66559 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 10:05 pm to
Plus I like to peel out.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41903 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

I do, since his company still isn't even close to free cash flow positive.



Except for the fact that his vision for tesla is to spend as much as they possibly can early to build infrastructure around the country as well as several mega factories to meet increasing demand.


Negative FCF at this point is absolutely within the parameters of his master plan.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26627 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 10:27 pm to
quote:

I don't see how a reasonable person could disagree that his vision has worked pretty much perfectly.


That's ridiculous.

Tesla has carved a small niche out for itself as an electric car company, but it's way early for a reasonable person to say that the company's vision of making electric cars for the masses has worked perfectly.

They have yet to introduce an electric car that is affordable to most Americans, and there's already cars scheduled for release this year with electric ranges at or near 200 miles with a price tag under $40,000. Tesla will be late to the game with their new Model 3, and they'll be facing competition from real car companies (that earn money) with vast dealership networks and very sophisticated supply chains. They are still trying to see positive cash flow, and I think they have a very challenging few years ahead of them to say the least.
This post was edited on 1/10/16 at 10:37 pm
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41903 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

It's an interesting, prominent philosophical question




Here's another philosophical question. Does it really matter if the autonomous car chooses to hit the pedestrian in this one in a million scenario, when the human operated car will also hit the pedestrian in a signifiant amount of similar instances, in addition to all the other fatal/seriously harmful incidents that will only occur due to human error?


For some reason in these threads, it seems like some people would rather have the tens of thousands of deaths caused by human error than the <1000 deaths that could be caused by a computer "choice" or error, or malfunction.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
66559 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 10:33 pm to
But it means we don't get to drive even if we want to. I like to drive.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 10:37 pm to
quote:

in this 1 in a million scenario, what do you think has a better chance of deciding the best outcome? the soccer mom texting her best friend while driving, the 80 year old that shouldnt be driving anyway, the 16 year old that has been driving for 10 days, or a processor who's sole job is analyzing thousands of datapoints per microsecond to make the best decision?


Modern airliners that use fly by wire systems have many processors making thousand of decisions per second, the pilot is just telling the plane where it needs to go, the flight computers figure out how to do it all based of programed decision making "laws", the autonomous cars are using very similar technology.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41903 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 10:37 pm to
quote:



Tesla has carved a small niche out for itself as an electric car company, but it's way early for a reasonable person to say that the company's vision of making electric cars for the masses has worked perfectly.
.



Let me clarify what I initially said. His vision has worked pretty much perfectly thus far.

quote:

there's already cars scheduled for release this year with 200+ mile ranges with a price tag under $40,000.


Link?

Chevy Bolt is still a concept car without a scheduled release date.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112944 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

He proposed a bunch of shite and designed a shitty over priced electric car,
Their top of the line car got the only perfect rating ever in the 75+ or however many year history of Motor Trend.


Sooooooooo shitty!!!!
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26627 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

Modern airliners that use fly by wire systems have many processors making thousand of decisions per second, the pilot is just telling the plane where it needs to go, the flight computers figure out how to do it all based of programed decision making "laws", the autonomous cars are using very similar technology.


The benefit to autonomous cars that I see is that they can potentially maximize/optimize the available capacity of our very limited surface transportation infrastructure. We can program autonomous vehicles to follow other autonomous vehicles closely, program correct merging techniques, have them brake and accelerate simultaneously, and, as a consequence, vastly increase the amount of cars we can currently fit on our highway network before it reaches full gridlock.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26627 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

Chevy Bolt is still a concept car without a scheduled release date.


It's not a concept car. The production version of the 2017 Chevrolet Bolt EV was revealed 4 days ago. Deliveries are starting this year from $37,000 before $7,000 in tax rebates.

LINK


quote:

General Motors GM -1.56% unveiled the 2017 Chevrolet Bolt at the International Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas last week; Bolt will be center stage at the 2016 North American International Auto Show in Detroit this week; and it’s supposed to go on sale by the end of the year. That’s a remarkably fast turnaround for a car that came out of seemingly nowhere as a concept only a year ago, at the 2015 NAIAS.

So Bolt will be the first all-electric in the United States with paradigm-changing range (around 200 miles) at a mainstream price (about $30,000 after government rebates). Because so far the lack of an acceptable between-charge range has been holding back EVs, and because Bolt will be priced accessibly, here’s betting that Bolt clearly will become a game-changer even if gasoline remains at about $2 a gallon through 2016.



BMW is also updating their I3 and improving their range and availability, but Bolt right now is poised to be the huge seller in the affordable electric car market.

quote:

This also is the goal of Tesla’s upcoming Model 3, but Tesla CEO Elon Musk recently said that the long-awaited, long-promoted Model 3 now won’t be available until “about two years” from now. Given that Tesla is just now getting around to producing its also long-awaited Model X sport-utility vehicle in volume, more than three years after unveiling the concept, it’s a pretty sure bet that Bolt will have this brand new EV segment all to itself for at least a year.


LINK

May not be a bad thing overall for Tesla in the grand scheme of things. This could mean that by the time the Model 3 is out in a few years, there could be a lot more electric vehicle infrastructure and support systems out there to help buyers adopt these new products.
This post was edited on 1/10/16 at 11:02 pm
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41903 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:00 pm to
LINK

According to this and your link, the Bolt doesn't have an actual release date. Just late 2016.

The bolt will also not be able to use the free and much faster tesla supercharging network.

Two more years is quite a wait for the Model 3. I guess we'll have to wait and see how this affects them.

ETA: I think a lot will depend on how close to the release of the Bolt will Tesla be able to reveal pictures/pricing/specs of the Model 3. Tesla may be able to put a chill on early Bolt sales by dropping all the info of the Model 3 at the same time the Bolt hits dealers.

If the Model 3 looks to be significantly better than the Bolt for around the same price, then I imagine a large chunk of buyers will wait it out.
This post was edited on 1/10/16 at 11:07 pm
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41903 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:15 pm to
Additionally, even if other manufacturers start bringing desirable and affordable EVs to the market, then Musk's personal vision for the future of personal transportation will have been achieved.

Maybe Tesla won't turn into one of the world's largest automakers, but I really don't think Musk will have a personal problem with the big boys stepping into and driving the EV market forward.

It's not like he needs the money. I'm sure he will sleep just fine at night knowing that he was a driving force behind getting the major manufacturers to bring EVs to the market. If you asked Elon Musk if he would shut down Tesla in exchange for every major brand offering an affordable, practical, and desirable EV, I think he would take that every day of the week.
This post was edited on 1/10/16 at 11:18 pm
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26627 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

According to this and your link, the Bolt doesn't have an actual release date. Just late 2016.

The bolt will also not be able to use the free and much faster tesla supercharging network.

Two more years is quite a wait for the Model 3. I guess we'll have to wait and see how this affects them.



Impossible to compare the two cars directly at this point, since we know nothing about the Model 3. It appears to be in the very early stages of development, and prioritized well behind the Model X. This is a critical market for Tesla, and IMO they've waited too long to get here only to finally reach the market after it's been saturated with established players. There's a tremendous advantage to being first to a potential market like this.

A month ago, I thought Tesla was doing well. After the announcement on the delay of the Model 3 and the Bolt's reveal, I think it's obvious that they are being out-flanked by Chevrolet and may not even be on the market before the new Nissan EV or the updated BMW i3...all of which enjoy the benefits of vast dealership networks with thousands more potential charging locations for their customers.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41903 posts
Posted on 1/10/16 at 11:28 pm to
quote:

This is a critical market for Tesla, and IMO they've waited too long to get here only to finally reach the market after it's been saturated with established players.


I agree that being first to market is an advantage. I think you are overstating that the market will be saturated with established players by the time the model 3 gets here.

Say the Model 3 comes in 2017. His competition will be 3 or 4 vehicles (unless something completely out of the blue comes out of one of the other majors).

Bolt and Leaf looks like the only main competition for your daily driver for the majority of the country. The i3 is tiny. Great for a city dweller, but most other will want something bigger and more comfortable. Smart cars aren't beating the civic, focus, cruze, etc...

Nissan needs to get their head out of their arse from an aesthetic stand point as well to compete. The current leaf is ugly as sin, and I think the Bolt/Model 3 would destroy it if price and range aren't heavily in the leaf's favor. The Bolt and (probably) the Model 3 will look like normal cars. The leaf will need a major exterior design makeover if it wants to compete going forward.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram