- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 12/11/22 at 12:42 pm to Highthoughts
Here is more for the nothing burgers.
Oh it’s just a campaign.
Oh it’s just a campaign.
quote:
FBI/DHS/DNI coordination. We entered this project conscious of reports that federal law enforcement agencies might be in contact with platforms like Twitter about content moderation. After not seeing it in the first batch, the Slack entries in “Part 3” contain multiple, clear displays of cooperation between Twitter and federal law enforcement and/or intelligence, including: a) Senior executives like Trust and Security chief Yoel Roth not only met regularly with the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security, but on at least one occasion liaised with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). This was not known previously.
b) Twitter executives didn’t just meet with agencies like the FBI, and didn’t just get general guidance about trends or warnings. We now have concrete examples of the FBI sending over reports about individual tweets, after which Twitter staff apply warning labels and other actions. This is direct evidence that federal law enforcement is in the business of identifying speech for regulation. How anyone can see that as a non-story is difficult for me to understand.
c) Continuing the theme of learning more about how Twitter works with its “trusted partners” in federal law enforcement, one of the most interesting exchanges was one of the least-noticed. In this Slack, Roth asks Twitter employees if they have a “debunk moment” about “the SCYTL/Smartmantic” vote counting conspiracies. He then says contacts at the DHS told him that these tales were an amalgam of “about 47 conspiracy theories.” He regrets DHS did not make this comment publicly.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 12:44 pm to Proximo
quote:
Maograth
Posted on 12/11/22 at 12:48 pm to dgnx6
quote:
How anyone can see that as a non-story is difficult for me to understand.
Because they're not intelligent enough to think independently.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 12:48 pm to RogerTheShrubber
This is the guy liberals have had their world view shaped by.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 12:49 pm to lsutigerelizabeth
It doesn’t take much for the simple minded to declare one a legend.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 12:52 pm to lsutigerelizabeth
It exist, but at a level and magnitude beyond your ability to understand, it’s not a bunch of ducking democrats like you dumb mfers think, Musk is just a billionaire, that’s not shite to them. They have tons of them supporting their agenda and military power beyond comprehension. They may even be able to bend time and space itself.
Musk isn’t even an ant to them, they can kill every human on this planet 1000 different ways.
Musk isn’t even an ant to them, they can kill every human on this planet 1000 different ways.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 12:54 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
He is giving a very filtered view to a couple of hacks so they can spin it.
You've gone off the rails.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 12:58 pm to Deactived
quote:
You've gone off the rails.
He's the critical thinker here, bro. Not like you lemmings who refuse to believe CBS, CNN, NYT, MSNBC, WaPo, NBC, and the president's press secretary who all disseminate the same information in unison.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 1:02 pm to AHM21
quote:
It doesn’t take much for the simple minded to declare one a legend.
Tesla and space x actually puts him in that category.
Unless you think building rockets to go into space and outdoing nasa is just stuff people do every day.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 1:16 pm to Eighteen
quote:
Ignore that it was called “hacked” even though it never was
One aspect I never understood is the hacking. Even if I formation is hacked, who gives a shite if it exposes corruption?
I mean I know it's illegal for me to look at and CNN said they will look at it for me and tell me what to think.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 1:28 pm to Deactived
quote:
One aspect I never understood is the hacking. Even if I formation is hacked, who gives a shite if it exposes corruption?
Because Twitter actually did have a policy that covered “hacked” materials prior to The NY Post Biden laptop story
So it was important for them to get that label applied quickly, and how conveniently for them the “ex intelligence officials” provided it for them in their letter and the entire MSM repeated in unison
ETA: you’re right in the general sense, but it’s important and does matter for the Twitter suppression story. it’s just now obvious Dem leadership and corrupt justice department conveniently had the “hacked” narrative ready to go for right when the story broke
This post was edited on 12/11/22 at 1:32 pm
Posted on 12/11/22 at 1:30 pm to Eighteen
I gotcha.
Curious if mmgrath would respond to your big post I took that piece from. Probably not
Curious if mmgrath would respond to your big post I took that piece from. Probably not
Posted on 12/11/22 at 1:33 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Maograth is the epitome of a Progressive
Posted on 12/11/22 at 1:39 pm to lsutigerelizabeth
Question -
I’ve read through this thread and tried reading through the Twitter files.
Is there clear evidence of Twitter doing something illegal here? Is that the accusation?
Is there hard proof?
I don’t need any one connecting dots for me. Just point to the proof. Like what could be submitted in a court. That kind of proof.
Thanks
I’ve read through this thread and tried reading through the Twitter files.
Is there clear evidence of Twitter doing something illegal here? Is that the accusation?
Is there hard proof?
I don’t need any one connecting dots for me. Just point to the proof. Like what could be submitted in a court. That kind of proof.
Thanks
Posted on 12/11/22 at 1:40 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
True part: Hunter Biden had a laptop. Your nonsense: there were incriminating emails implicating Biden as "the Big Guy" getting bribes
Just amazing
Posted on 12/11/22 at 1:47 pm to redneck hippie
quote:
Question -
I’ve read through this thread and tried reading through the Twitter files.
Is there clear evidence of Twitter doing something illegal here? Is that the accusation?
Is there hard proof?
I don’t need any one connecting dots for me. Just point to the proof. Like what could be submitted in a court. That kind of proof.
Thanks
Let’s be honest here. If you had watched a live feed of the head of the DOJ typing in, “We are going to round up all Republicans and execute them and we need Twitter’s assistance” and the head of Twitter type in “Okay”, you’d explain it away somehow.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 1:48 pm to redneck hippie
quote:
Question - I’ve read through this thread and tried reading through the Twitter files. Is there clear evidence of Twitter doing something illegal here? Is that the accusation? Is there hard proof? I don’t need any one connecting dots for me. Just point to the proof. Like what could be submitted in a court. That kind of proof. Thanks
Well a court would have to take it up. The evidence is there because they have internal communications. They were working with government agencies to censor speech.
Do you need a jury to find someone guilty of a crime to think this is true or something?
That’s not going to happen. If anything it will be civil cases.
Posted on 12/11/22 at 1:55 pm to redneck hippie
quote:
I don’t need any one connecting dots for me.
In case you were wondering when everyone realized you were full of shite. You're supposed to just act on these stupid things not say them out loud, dummy. It ruins the fun.
Page 5 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News