- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ebola Nurse files suit. Violation of civil rights
Posted on 10/23/15 at 8:48 am to LSUTANGERINE
Posted on 10/23/15 at 8:48 am to LSUTANGERINE
Wasn't she within the time period that potential symptoms of Ebola could still arise when she arrived in the US?
She may have taken all the necessary steps to ensure she didn't catch Ebola in Africa, but every nursing program stresses the need for precautionary measures, so certainly I think she could understand the desire for the state of New Jersey to make sure she was fine before letting her go out into the public.
And she stresses in that article that Christie did it out of spreading political fear, yet Eric Duncan had just died in Dallas from Ebola. If she had gone through the airport with no problem and told someone that she was just in West Africa, that person would be freaked out.
She may have taken all the necessary steps to ensure she didn't catch Ebola in Africa, but every nursing program stresses the need for precautionary measures, so certainly I think she could understand the desire for the state of New Jersey to make sure she was fine before letting her go out into the public.
And she stresses in that article that Christie did it out of spreading political fear, yet Eric Duncan had just died in Dallas from Ebola. If she had gone through the airport with no problem and told someone that she was just in West Africa, that person would be freaked out.
Posted on 10/23/15 at 8:56 am to Walking the Earth
quote:
You seem oddly thrilled with that result.
The modern American prefer to have the state make decisions for them and give them free cell phones and such. Why is this a shocking statement? Some governor illegally confines a person based on ZERO evidence violates her civil rights and she is a bitch. See how that works.
Posted on 10/23/15 at 9:00 am to LSUTANGERINE
Sorry you dumb bitch, the courts will say Public safety trumps your rights.
Posted on 10/23/15 at 9:20 am to HeadSlash
quote:
the courts will say Public safety trumps your rights.
I sure hope not. That will just continue the erosion of freedoms in this country. If she tested negative for ebola I see no reason she should have been imprisoned (quarantined.) It's not like ebola is an airborne disease, there are reasons these outbreaks do not happen in the first world.
Posted on 10/23/15 at 9:21 am to HeadSlash
quote:
the courts will say Public safety trumps your rights.
yeesh
better hope the court doesn't come after your guns because of "public safety"
Posted on 10/23/15 at 9:23 am to HeadSlash
quote:
Sorry you dumb bitch, the courts will say Public safety trumps your rights.
I hope not.
But I still believe in freedom.
This post was edited on 10/23/15 at 9:23 am
Posted on 10/23/15 at 9:23 am to LSUTANGERINE
I never trust someone with drawn on eyebrows. 
Posted on 10/23/15 at 11:15 am to MontyFranklyn
quote:
The guaranteed safety and wellness of thousands, maybe millions, is far more important than her individual civil rights.
Glad to see you are also against bans on guns and alcohol, not to mention fatty foods.
Posted on 10/23/15 at 11:20 am to ksayetiger
quote:
Suspected infected
Great name for a rock band.
Posted on 10/23/15 at 11:22 am to LSUTANGERINE
Please post a pic of yourself.
I want to understand you better.
TIA
I want to understand you better.
TIA
Posted on 10/23/15 at 11:26 am to HeadSlash
Sorry you dumb bitch, the courts will say Public safety trumps your rights
You can justify any trampling of personal and individual rights in the name of "Public safety".
You can justify any trampling of personal and individual rights in the name of "Public safety".
Posted on 10/23/15 at 11:46 am to Salmon
quote:Salmon with the boom. Lets see the dumb rednecks in this thread respond to that
better hope the court doesn't come after your guns because of "public safety"
Posted on 10/23/15 at 11:48 am to SoFla Tideroller
quote:You see how easy it is for the govt to take control? People support it. It is pretty scary actually
You can justify any trampling of personal and individual rights in the name of "Public safety".
Posted on 10/23/15 at 12:46 pm to Sayre
quote:
Good for her for standing up for her civil rights. They get trampled on too often with no repercussions
A mandatory quarantine for a person who is returning from a disease stricken area in which she was treating patients for a disease which has a long incubation period is a very reasonable requirement.
Her civil rights were NOT violated, IMO. And, the fact that she didn't contract the disease doesn't really address the fact that she violated the quarantine. She should be facing criminal charges, IMO.
Posted on 10/23/15 at 12:46 pm to moneyg
quote:She already had tested negative bro
Her civil rights were NOT violated, IMO. And, the fact that she didn't contract the disease doesn't really address the fact that she violated the quarantine. She should be facing criminal charges, IMO
Posted on 10/23/15 at 12:49 pm to lsupride87
quote:
She already had tested negative bro
Was that test conclusive given the incubation period?
Posted on 10/23/15 at 1:11 pm to moneyg
quote:
Was that test conclusive given the incubation period?
Do your own research, you scared fascist.
Posted on 10/23/15 at 1:23 pm to Artie Rome
This could get interesting if her attorneys ask for emails from Cristie and his staff. I wouldn't be shocked if are numerous people who told him she wasn't a real risk.
Posted on 10/23/15 at 1:27 pm to Artie Rome
quote:
Do your own research, you scared fascist.
So, you don't know?
Popular
Back to top


0









