- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DOJ Epstein files release site is live
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:02 pm to Willie Stroker
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:02 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:trump was asked on multiple occasions during the campaign if he would release the files. On each occasion (sometimes after a heaping helping of word salad) he said that we would.
What is the evidence that leads you to believe he campaigned on the release of Epstein files?
and then there’s this, June 2024
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:03 pm to dallastigers
that file was in the release yesterday, lots of people downloaded it. It disappeared as soon as people started sharing it online
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:29 pm to cgrand
so, to recap
they promised to release the files, then staged a photo op with binders and MAGA influencers
then they said there was nothing to see in the files
then they scoured the files & shutdown the government to stop a VOTE on the files
then they threatened their own lawmakers who voted to yes on the files, and called them traitors
then they refused to fully comply with the law to show the files
now they’re quietly deleting some of the files they released because you could see that despite their scouring, Trump was in fact, still in the files
this is comical
they promised to release the files, then staged a photo op with binders and MAGA influencers
then they said there was nothing to see in the files
then they scoured the files & shutdown the government to stop a VOTE on the files
then they threatened their own lawmakers who voted to yes on the files, and called them traitors
then they refused to fully comply with the law to show the files
now they’re quietly deleting some of the files they released because you could see that despite their scouring, Trump was in fact, still in the files
this is comical
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:46 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:
What is the evidence that leads you to believe he campaigned on the release of Epstein files?
He campaigned on Draining the Swamp.
What's more Swamp than our own politicians being blackmailed, and using underaged females to do it?
Posted on 12/20/25 at 3:54 pm to Swamp puppy
AP:
LINK
LINK
quote:
NEW YORK (AP) — At least 16 files disappeared from the Justice Department’s public webpage for documents related to Jeffrey Epstein — including a photograph showing President Donald Trump — less than a day after they were posted, with no explanation from the government and no notice to the public. The missing files, which were available Friday and no longer accessible by Saturday, included images of paintings depicting nude women, and one showing a series of photographs along a credenza and in drawers. In that image, inside a drawer among other photos, was a photograph of Trump, alongside Epstein, Melania Trump and Epstein’s longtime associate Ghislaine Maxwell.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 4:06 pm to cgrand
Not defending this weirdo but his late night activities have been a "cash cow" to many. If there were any young women out there that got busy with any President of the United States of America they would be riding a huge gravy train right now. TMZ and the likes would make them a millionaire for an exclusive.
quote:
Jeffrey Epstein Settlements for Victims & Survivors
Many Jeffrey Epstein victims have received compensation from sexual abuse settlements, allowing them to afford therapy, make up for lost wages, and more.
From May 2020 to August 2021, the financier’s estate ran the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program, which allowed survivors to apply for a payout. Others have gotten compensation from lawsuits against those who enabled his abuse.
Past Jeffrey Epstein settlements include:
$290 Million to survivors who claimed that JPMorgan turned a blind eye to Epstein’s actions
Over $121 Million for more than 130 Jeffrey Epstein victims from the estate-run compensation fund
$75 Million to resolve claims from the U.S. Virgin Islands that JPMorgan facilitated Epstein’s trafficking
$500,000 to Virginia Giuffre, which became public during a lawsuit involving Prince Andrew
$75 Million to dozens of women from Deutsche Bank
$105 Million paid by Jeffrey Epstein’s estate to the U.S. Virgin Islands
This post was edited on 12/20/25 at 4:08 pm
Posted on 12/20/25 at 4:10 pm to Disco Ball
quote:
If there were any young women out there that got busy with any President of the United States of America they would be riding a huge gravy train right now.
quote:
E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump is the name of two related civil lawsuits by American author E. Jean Carroll against United States President Donald Trump. The two suits resulted in a total of $88.3 million in damages awarded to Carroll; both cases are under appeal.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 4:21 pm to cgrand
quote:
quote:
E. Jean Carroll v. Donald J. Trump is the name of two related civil lawsuits by American author E. Jean Carroll against United States President Donald Trump. The two suits resulted in a total of $88.3 million in damages awarded to Carroll; both cases are under appeal.
Exactly my point. E. Jean Carrol is 82 years old
Posted on 12/20/25 at 4:44 pm to cgrand
quote:
trump was asked on multiple occasions during the campaign if he would release the files. On each occasion (sometimes after a heaping helping of word salad) he said that we would. and then there’s this, June 2024
I’m only aware of him being asked once on Fox and Friends, and once on a Lex Friedman podcast.
We normally identify content that appears on campaign materials as subjects that politicians campaign on. I don’t ever recall a time in history when the public viewed interview questions that never make it to campaign platform as meaning the candidate is running on that issue. When did that change?
His mentioning of it twice were both reactive answers, not proactive promises.
When a candidate is running on their policies, we hear about it repeatedly during their campaign speeches, see it in their campaign materials, and hear about it in paid ads. None of that happened, did it?
There’s a reason politicians don’t update their websites after every interview- those answers do not become new campaign promises.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 4:50 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:
I’m only aware of him being asked once on Fox and Friends, and once on a Lex Friedman podcast.
How many times does it need to be asked and answered for you to be satisfied?
And others within the campaign addressed it. Pam Bondi, Vance, and Patel are firmly on record in support of the release. These are people very close to Trump.
Popular
Back to top

1






