- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Does Force really equal Mass X Acceleration? I think not.
Posted on 12/26/19 at 11:18 pm
Posted on 12/26/19 at 11:18 pm
(no message)
Posted on 12/26/19 at 11:19 pm to Rammin TX
You want to defend your position, Einstein?
Posted on 12/26/19 at 11:20 pm to Rammin TX
Mass x Acceleration = Rammin
Posted on 12/26/19 at 11:20 pm to Rammin TX
Force=female, shitlord
Posted on 12/26/19 at 11:22 pm to Rammin TX
When I am king, e will no longer equal mc²
E WILL EQUAL E DAMMIT!!!
E WILL EQUAL E DAMMIT!!!
Posted on 12/26/19 at 11:26 pm to Rammin TX
Midi clorians = force
Duh
Duh
Posted on 12/26/19 at 11:26 pm to Rammin TX
Nope.
I think there are fundamental 4th and 5th dimensional aspects which we cannot understand in the current biological form we have.
shite, they just figured out recently that it is possible to move space rather than move an object through space.
The energy requirements just happen to exceed anything we can grasp on a non theoretical level.
I think there are fundamental 4th and 5th dimensional aspects which we cannot understand in the current biological form we have.
shite, they just figured out recently that it is possible to move space rather than move an object through space.
The energy requirements just happen to exceed anything we can grasp on a non theoretical level.
This post was edited on 12/26/19 at 11:31 pm
Posted on 12/26/19 at 11:26 pm to Rammin TX
quote:
Prove me wrong
You made the statement. Therefore, prove you’re right
Posted on 12/26/19 at 11:27 pm to Rammin TX
quote:
Does Force really equal Mass X Acceleration?
That's just one way to define it
Posted on 12/26/19 at 11:27 pm to Rammin TX
You must be a flat earther. fricking retard.
Posted on 12/26/19 at 11:29 pm to Rammin TX
I was hoping for a new scientific breakthrough before I opened this thread.
Posted on 12/26/19 at 11:29 pm to Rammin TX
quote:
Prove me wrong
That's not how this works.
You're attacking a known scientific formula...you tell us why you think it's wrong.
Posted on 12/26/19 at 11:35 pm to Rammin TX
What round are we talkin about? .308, .44 mag...what?
Posted on 12/26/19 at 11:39 pm to auggie
9x23mm
My favorite screw you caliber.
My favorite screw you caliber.
Posted on 12/26/19 at 11:51 pm to X123F45
I never have shot 1. talked to a guy at the range the other day that had 1, he was kind of a smart arse though, so I went on over to the rifle line.
Posted on 12/27/19 at 12:10 am to auggie
quote:
What round are we talkin about? .308, .44 mag...what?
Doesn't matter with the possible exception of depleted uranium or tungsten 25 or 30mm rounds where density, pinpoint pressure, aerodynamic drag and penetration play more vital roles than sheer force.
Still, Newton's 2nd Law of motion applies, just less so because the objectives are different than with normal ballistics.
In ballistics I would argue that the Barrett .416 is the ultimate application of the 2nd Law.
In man made projectiles I might argue that kinetic bombs or projectiles are the apex of destructive weaponry when launched from outer space.
Posted on 12/27/19 at 12:21 am to scrooster
quote:
I might argue that kinetic bombs or projectiles are the apex of destructive weaponry when launched from outer space.
Stands to reason, that it would be better to have gravity working in your favor for a long distance, instead of against you.
Posted on 12/27/19 at 12:47 am to scrooster
Cobra commander wants 50% of the profits you make since you stole his idea.
Popular
Back to top

16











