re: Doctor posts health insurance incentive plan for giving the COVID vaccine

quote:

---

Sounds like she’s full of shite.

---

Your understanding of this situation is remarkable.

who didnt know this?


ivermectin wasnt making anybody any money, covid was also more lucrative than the flu.

quote:

---

Because it’s not being paid by the entity (vaccine manufacturer) that is profiting from sale. It’s being paid by the entity that stands to save money from widespread usage of the vaccine.

How do you tie your shoes?

---

The largest health insurance provider is the government.


Reimbursement for covid shots were almost double of any previous vaccines.


$40 per shot, while previously it was $16 for first dose and $28 for your second. So $80 to get your covid shot vs $44 and $28 for any other vaccine.

613 million doses at an extra $36 or $52 reimbursement?




You must use velcro.

The sicker the patient population the less money an Insurance company will make

It’s not a secret. With all the data the insurance companies have it clearly leaned to the vaccine promoting a healthier less hospital ridden patient pool

Not rocket science. This is the opposite of the bombshell you want this to be

Please explain how a private insurer makes money by paying providers extra money to push the vaccine.



(I know how they make money by doing this but I want your explanation)

quote:

---

Clearly their internal data is favorable to the vaccine.

---

Obviously they were very pro-vaccine early. The Cares Act did require that health plans cover the cost. Perhaps there were also financial incentives offered to them?

quote:

---

Frankly this is the biggest knock to the vaccine skeptics that has ever been posted on here despite being posted as a knock against the vaccine

---

Maybe I'm not understanding your point. Do you think it was reasonable for the insurance companies to hedge their bets that short term protection from the vaccine was more financially beneficial than potential costs from unknown risks? For the entire population, including children and recovered individuals who were at miniscule risk of serious disease? Not to mention the myocarditis risk.

With a high burden of diseases related to the immune system - asthma, allergies, eczema, cancer, type 1 diabetes, arthritis, lupus, crohn's, celiac, colitis, psoriasis. ms, inflammatory bowel disease, thyroiditis, etc. - maybe it is time to be a little more skeptical and consider that vaccines (individually or cumulatively) could play a part in triggering some of these chronic conditions.

The lengths some of y’all will go to defend a complete fraud just because they parrot something you like

No doctor is treating 6,000 patients in 90 days. Not happening

quote:

---

Maybe I'm not understanding your point. Do you think it was reasonable for the insurance companies to hedge their bets that short term protection from the vaccine was more financially beneficial than potential costs from unknown risks? For the entire population, including children and recovered individuals who were at miniscule risk of serious disease? Not to mention the myocarditis risk. With a high burden of diseases related to the immune system - asthma, allergies, eczema, cancer, type 1 diabetes, arthritis, lupus, crohn's, celiac, colitis, psoriasis. ms, inflammatory bowel disease, thyroiditis, etc. - maybe it is time to be a little more skeptical and consider that vaccines (individually or cumulatively) could play a part in triggering some of these chronic conditions.

---

What I’m saying is that the insurance companies only goal is to make money.

They make money by taking in premiums and not paying out via not having to pay for hospitalizations etc

They also have a massive database of information about their populations health.


They felt that the cost of paying extra to providers for vaccinations would have prevented enough illness to justify it. That means they weighed the risk of clots from the “clot shot” risk of “dying suddenly” etc. they don’t get anymore premiums when someone “dies suddenly”