re: Do you think it's possible an advanced civilization existed billions of years ago on earth

quote:

---

Just started thinking about it bc i saw an article about cave drawings from 67,800

---

What the heck was they drawing with ? Rust oleum painted graffiti only lasts a couple decades

So the suggestion is slave labor is an alternative solution to mathematical perfection?

Again, I don’t disagree, it’s just incredibly hard to believe

quote:

---

Take a look at all these massive stones on these huge sites in Peru and Egypt and Syria. We couldn't do that to this day.

---

What stones are you referring to? I’ve never heard of any that I couldn’t move and position with a few thousand slaves.

The Baalbek stones for starters. One of those is over 3 Million pounds.

Idk about billions but there’s evidence that suggest there was 10000+ years ago

quote:

---

I said the stones are so perfect it perplexes scientists to this day

---

It isn't perfect.

quote:

---

 (slaves in my opinion) had the ability to do this. I don’t, it’s too hard to believe.

---

So because some cant fathom that the Incas could do it it has to be aliens, time travellers or a previous advanced civilization that used only stone? No, it was the Incas and time.

quote:

---

If it was, why did we employ NASA to perform the moon landing? Based on your logic, slaves could’ve built the Saturn rockets because mathematical features can be accomplished through manpower rather than intelligence

---

This makes no sense as an analogy. Plus, while the Incas were building the site, they were using their engineers and other skilled folks, not just laborers.

quote:

---

The Baalbek stones for starters. One of those is over 3 Million pounds.

---

But it was never moved.

quote:

---

The remaining three are Roman monoliths, not part of a larger structure, conventionally known as the "Stone of the Pregnant Woman" (estimated at 1,000 t), the "Stone of the South" (est. 1,242 t), and the "Forgotten Stone" (est. 1,650 t). These are the first, third, and tied fifth largest known stones ever quarried in human history. They are believed to have been intended for the nearby Jupiter Baal complex, possibly as an addition to the Trilithon; but, perhaps due to their size, they were never removed from their quarry.

---

The smaller ones were all moved downhill. Sounds very doable with enough slaves.

quote:

---

You can’t even fit a piece of 8x11 paper in the gaps of the stone

---

I've read that but it seems to be something repeated after one person said it.

quote:

---

I never said it wasn’t the Incas, nor did I say it was aliens, time travelers, or an advanced civilization. I’m simply saying it is an anomaly that needs further explanation.

---

Good. Its not really an anomaly as we see people from around the world were capable of making great structures.

quote:

---

You’ve shown zero proof in your very strong opinions that you apparently have conviction on. Please show proof. 

---

Proof of what, the the Incas built it? Im not the one(maybe you as well) making fantastical claims about it.

One time I foundt a billion-year-old Nintendo game.

quote:

---

If it was, why did we employ NASA to perform the moon landing? Based on your logic, slaves could’ve built the Saturn rockets because mathematical features can be accomplished through manpower rather than intelligence

---

You are almost perfectly arguing why believing advanced civilizations using stones doesn't make sense and you don't even realize it.

Something like the NASA mission required math, materials, and scientific understanding that civilizations who used stone were not capable of. That's exactly why these civilizations used....stone. The problem with stone is its weight, which can be solved by manpower and far less advanced math/scientific understanding. Otherwise, it's completely manipulatable by unsophisticated societies, which is exactly why you see it so commonly used by less sophisticated societies.

The good thing about stone is that it can last a LONG time, which is why there is such a robust history of discovery of stone structures by archeology.