Started By
Message

re: Did two children just die on Bluff Road in Ascension Parish?

Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:46 pm to
Posted by genuineLSUtiger
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
77178 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:46 pm to
Like Champagne? He seems like a smug SOB.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
69574 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:47 pm to

quote:

The post did not say they think "it was something else".


so you gathered from me saying I seriously doubt texting was involved that I wasn't thinking any number of other reasons could have caused the accident?

quote:

They specifically said they seriously doubt it was due to texting.


Yes i did...which meant that in my opinion the crash was more likely due to other factors. My first thought was wet roads (which IMO would be a more common factor than texting while driving).

Texting while driving has become the new drunk driving. Show me statistics where texting causes more wrecks than road conditions, driver error, weather conditions, etc
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

As many times as I run into people that are ignorant and don't know when to just stop.
I read in an extensively peer-reviewed article that I can't locate at the moment that every heated argument you get into on the internet takes 3 months off your life. Just saying...
Posted by CorkSoaker
Member since Oct 2008
9823 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

I'd resort to name calling to if I was you. Good stuff.



I'd resort to name calling Too if I Were you. Good stuff.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88718 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:53 pm to
I think I would have to actually feel heated for that to happen
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92902 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

I'd resort to name calling Too if I Were you. Good stuff.



FAIL
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88718 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

I'd resort to name calling Too if I Were you. Good stuff.


I'm just going to take this as you conceding that I'm right even if I got a little lazy with my grammar.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
69574 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

LNCHBOX


thanks for fighting my battles man...sorry about the 3 months
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88718 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

lsu480


You've brought a whole lot to this thread. As usual.
Posted by CorkSoaker
Member since Oct 2008
9823 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

I'm just going to take this as you conceding that I'm right even if I got a little lazy with my grammar.


Don't. There you go assuming incorrectly again.

I don't think you got a little lazy with your grammar. I think you got a little stupid and didn't know any better

You are terrible at arguing.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88718 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

There you go assuming incorrectly again.


Actually you were the one with troubles assuming.

quote:

I don't think you got a little lazy with your grammar. I think you got a little stupid and didn't know any better


I can assure you it was lazy, unless you were too stupid to put a period at the end of the second sentence.

quote:

You are terrible at arguing.



Yea, the person that has fallen to calling names and grammar booming wants to talk about being terrible about arguing.
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92902 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

You've brought a whole lot to this thread. As usual.



Link? Do you have a study to back that up?
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88718 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Link? Do you have a study to back that up?


Any time I've notice you reply to me it's nothing but insults, and you weren't even in the discussion. Just pretty useless IMO.
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
15856 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 3:19 pm to
Pothole has been fixed!!
Posted by tracytiger
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2009
3631 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 3:30 pm to
That's interesting. Thanks for bringing some info to this thread instead of the bitch slapping going on above.
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
58887 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Link? Do you have a study to back that up?



I enjoyed that one 480, classic LNCHBOX line right there. I think he purposely browses threads just looking for someone that states a point just to throw "link?" at them.
Posted by rebeloke
Member since Nov 2012
17053 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 4:21 pm to
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53647 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

Like Champagne? He seems like a smug SOB.


Just because I can whip your arse in a debate on a topic doesn't make me smug, it just means that you suck at reasoning and debate.
Posted by Overbrook
Member since May 2013
6378 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:53 pm to
If no one did anything wrong: no substances, no texting, no speeding, then the speed limit is too high.
Which it is.
you get tail-gated going 50 on these winding, shoulderless roads in this Parish
Posted by genuineLSUtiger
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
77178 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:56 pm to
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram