- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:47 pm to CorkSoaker
quote:
The post did not say they think "it was something else".
so you gathered from me saying I seriously doubt texting was involved that I wasn't thinking any number of other reasons could have caused the accident?
quote:
They specifically said they seriously doubt it was due to texting.
Yes i did...which meant that in my opinion the crash was more likely due to other factors. My first thought was wet roads (which IMO would be a more common factor than texting while driving).
Texting while driving has become the new drunk driving. Show me statistics where texting causes more wrecks than road conditions, driver error, weather conditions, etc
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:51 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:I read in an extensively peer-reviewed article that I can't locate at the moment that every heated argument you get into on the internet takes 3 months off your life. Just saying...
As many times as I run into people that are ignorant and don't know when to just stop.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:52 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
I'd resort to name calling to if I was you. Good stuff.
I'd resort to name calling Too if I Were you. Good stuff.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:53 pm to boom roasted
I think I would have to actually feel heated for that to happen 
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:54 pm to CorkSoaker
quote:
I'd resort to name calling Too if I Were you. Good stuff.
FAIL
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:55 pm to CorkSoaker
quote:
I'd resort to name calling Too if I Were you. Good stuff.
I'm just going to take this as you conceding that I'm right even if I got a little lazy with my grammar.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:57 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
LNCHBOX
thanks for fighting my battles man...sorry about the 3 months
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:57 pm to lsu480
quote:
lsu480
You've brought a whole lot to this thread. As usual.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:58 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
I'm just going to take this as you conceding that I'm right even if I got a little lazy with my grammar.
Don't. There you go assuming incorrectly again.
I don't think you got a little lazy with your grammar. I think you got a little stupid and didn't know any better
You are terrible at arguing.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 1:00 pm to CorkSoaker
quote:
There you go assuming incorrectly again.
Actually you were the one with troubles assuming.
quote:
I don't think you got a little lazy with your grammar. I think you got a little stupid and didn't know any better
I can assure you it was lazy, unless you were too stupid to put a period at the end of the second sentence.
quote:
You are terrible at arguing.
Yea, the person that has fallen to calling names and grammar booming wants to talk about being terrible about arguing.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 1:05 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
You've brought a whole lot to this thread. As usual.
Link? Do you have a study to back that up?
Posted on 6/25/14 at 1:06 pm to lsu480
quote:
Link? Do you have a study to back that up?
Any time I've notice you reply to me it's nothing but insults, and you weren't even in the discussion. Just pretty useless IMO.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 3:30 pm to Schmelly
That's interesting. Thanks for bringing some info to this thread instead of the bitch slapping going on above.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 4:20 pm to lsu480
quote:
Link? Do you have a study to back that up?
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:37 pm to genuineLSUtiger
quote:
Like Champagne? He seems like a smug SOB.
Just because I can whip your arse in a debate on a topic doesn't make me smug, it just means that you suck at reasoning and debate.
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:53 pm to Will Cover
If no one did anything wrong: no substances, no texting, no speeding, then the speed limit is too high.
Which it is.
you get tail-gated going 50 on these winding, shoulderless roads in this Parish
Which it is.
you get tail-gated going 50 on these winding, shoulderless roads in this Parish
Popular
Back to top


1




