Started By
Message

re: Did the Indian wars help American military in the 20th century?

Posted on 12/20/19 at 8:31 pm to
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
33926 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 8:31 pm to
I believe those rules are still read. Possibly the marines?
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 8:36 pm to
No. Most of the Indian wars were over well before world wars and the final subjugation of the Comanches was horseback warfare and wasn’t really translatable to the trench, artillery bloodbath of WWI and beyond.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
49200 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 8:44 pm to
Patton commanded one of the earliest "mechanized" attacks during the Pancho Villa expedition, using Dodge touring cars.

Of course he went on to be the foremost proponent of armored warfare in the US Army, commanding the US tank school in France and leading them into battle before being wounded.

Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 8:46 pm to
That wasn’t an Indian war.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
49200 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

That wasn’t an Indian war.


If you read the OP you will see he mentions Patton and Pancho Villa.

FO
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34653 posts
Posted on 12/21/19 at 10:07 pm to
Black Jack Pershing gained his nickname because he once commanded a unit of black cavalry, aka Buffalo Soldiers.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64533 posts
Posted on 12/21/19 at 11:32 pm to
Well it’s an interesting premise, but mistaken none the less. One of the first things both French & British officers noticed about American units once they reached the front in WWI was the appalling losses they sustained by making the same mistakes the French & British made in 1914 through 1916.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124145 posts
Posted on 12/22/19 at 12:22 am to
Now the Spanish American war not too long prior to the Great War May have taught some lessons about early modern warfare
Posted by ecb
Member since Jul 2010
9338 posts
Posted on 12/22/19 at 5:14 am to
I believe the main thing we learned in the Spanish American war was the .30-40 Krag was inferior to the Mauser.
Posted by ecb
Member since Jul 2010
9338 posts
Posted on 12/22/19 at 5:23 am to
“That were still putting down Native American unrest while he was a kid. “

Exterminating the Indians is what we were doing, don’t church it up. We aren’t kids anymore.
Posted by Zendog
Santa Barbara
Member since Feb 2019
4481 posts
Posted on 12/22/19 at 5:36 am to
Didn’t hurt
Posted by hubertcumberdale
Member since Nov 2009
6506 posts
Posted on 12/22/19 at 5:40 am to
Idk dude read a freaking book
Posted by Priapus
Member since Oct 2012
1950 posts
Posted on 12/22/19 at 6:42 am to
Ask William Fetterman about those Indian tactics.
Posted by Boo Krewe
Member since Apr 2015
9810 posts
Posted on 12/22/19 at 8:00 am to
Britain almost won revolution war
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8002 posts
Posted on 12/22/19 at 10:36 am to
quote:


“That were still putting down Native American unrest while he was a kid. “

Exterminating the Indians is what we were doing, don’t church it up. We aren’t kids anymore.



Not a whole lot of “exterminating” going on in the 1880’s, home slice. Outside of Wounded Knee, a relatively minor incident, it was mostly trying to corral tribes and groups who didn’t want to move to reservations, social and physical infrastructure development, and the like.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
35020 posts
Posted on 12/22/19 at 10:37 am to
quote:

experience in guerilla warfare made the American military used to fighting in unconventional ways thereby naturally being able to adapt to the modern battlefield where fighting in straight lines is a death sentence?


The Americans were WOEFULLY unprepared for wwi in terms of tactics.
Posted by geaux88
Northshore, LA
Member since Oct 2003
16355 posts
Posted on 12/22/19 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Possibly the marines?


No. The Army Ranger Battalions.
Posted by adambomb
Member since Dec 2014
1462 posts
Posted on 12/22/19 at 10:39 am to
The Indian wars showed deficiencies in the army. Tbh I don’t think it made that big an impact compared to our actions in the Philippines (though maybe it helped with the guerrillas) and then WW1. Of course, the military is always evolving and probably underwent its biggest changes post ww1 and specifically 1922 act
Posted by tigahbruh
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2014
2858 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Patton fought Apache

Patton born 1885.
Did he fight them in a former life or as a toddler?
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134860 posts
Posted on 12/23/19 at 9:05 am to
quote:

To be fair, the U.S. had a few years of watching the quagmire of WWI battles and being able to see "that ain't working".

Not really. They basically made the same rookie mistakes that everyone else made when they joined the fight.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram