Started By
Message

re: Delphi, IN Murders Trial Thread

Posted on 10/22/24 at 12:51 am to
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
61195 posts
Posted on 10/22/24 at 12:51 am to
quote:

More photos showed what evidence Olehay documented, which included photos of the girls’ wounds, a pool of blood, and other parts of the primary crime scene called Ground Zero.


How big this pool of blood will be important as the part of the defense is that the girls were killed elsewhere and then brought back to the crime scene. The “real killer(s)” would have had to collected their blood and brought enough back to dump in and around the “right” place relative to the bodies. That just seems really far-fetched.

And for 7 years nobody has ever revealed the extent of “the girls’ wounds.” I’m not some weirdo who needs to know all the gory details, but I’m curious why they’ve never been revealed. I totally get honoring the families’ wishes of not having that kind of stuff leaked to the public, but if it’s germane, I’d like to know. There were rumors that he beheaded one and put it on top of another one’s body, that he sliced one from her genitalia up to her neck, etc…If that didn’t happen, I think it’d be best to quell those rumors, but if it did, it would speak to the psychopathy of whatever monster did this. And I 99.999% think it was Allen, but that is an unusually wild way for a “1st kill.” Would make me me think he had gotten away with others previously.

I don’t think his wife “knew.” Maybe she expected something, but was in denial, which I can understand. But I bet she’s called by the prosecution, and I wonder what she has to say about some of his behavior, not just after the murders, but leading up to them. And not just the days, weeks, months, but years. He had to have shown some sort of signs—dots that she can put together with hindsight. I don’t blame her (now) for not knowing or expecting-cognitive dissonance is a real thing. But knowing what she does now, there has to be pieces of a puzzle she has been able to put together. Again, I can’t believe some regular nerd who worked at CVS and whose only apparent hobby was to shoot pool, just woke up one day at 45 and decided to slice up a couple of 13 and 14 year old girls. That seems to go so against what we “know” about these monsters. But maybe the more we “know,” the more we realize we don’t know.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
20943 posts
Posted on 10/22/24 at 5:10 am to
quote:

There were rumors that he beheaded one and put it on top of another one’s body, that he sliced one from her genitalia up to her neck,

That is similar to what Danny Rolling did in the Gainesville student murders.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
22391 posts
Posted on 10/22/24 at 6:49 am to
quote:

How big this pool of blood will be important as the part of the defense is that the girls were killed elsewhere and then brought back to the crime scene. The “real killer(s)” would have had to collected their blood and brought enough back to dump in and around the “right” place relative to the bodies. That just seems really far-fetched.


This was always a bullshite idea. The chances of the girls being found where they were last seen, but someone murdering them elsewhere and then bringing them back…is ridiculous.

I know it was likely at night, but I’m curious is there’s a reason the girls weren’t found the first day? It sounds like they were found across the creek from the bridge so many they just didn’t look that far?

It says their clothes were found in one spot but not necessarily on their bodies, but the girls were found when a tie dye shirt was seen? Is that correct? It’s possible the shirt was still on but maybe not some other clothes?
This post was edited on 10/22/24 at 6:50 am
Posted by bikerack
NH
Member since Sep 2011
2340 posts
Posted on 10/22/24 at 9:00 am to
The rumors about the beheading and switching probably come from the fact that both had gruesome neck wounds and one of the girls was wearing the clothes from the other girl.

Also, the theories related to bringing the bodies back have a lot to do with the phone signal not being pinged by the closest cell tower as of a certain time on the day they went missing and then pinging the tower again as of 4:30AM the day they were discovered. The phone was found under one of the bodies and it sounds like it was damp. That may account for it not being pingable for a period of time.

Also, related to the blood patterns on their bodies, you could make the case that they were dragged to the spot they were found.

Not saying I believe any of these...just repeating what I have been seeing from people with their own theories and those in the courtroom.
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
49049 posts
Posted on 10/22/24 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

t says their clothes were found in one spot but not necessarily on their bodies, but the girls were found when a tie dye shirt was seen? Is that correct? It’s possible the shirt was still on but maybe not some other clothes?


My understanding is one girl was naked and one was clothed, but in the clothes of the other girl. It's very bizarre. It would seem to me that if the bodies were moved by dragging, there would be some blood evidence in the area as well as a disturbed path where the dragging took place. I'm unclear about the possible moving of the bodies.
Posted by bikerack
NH
Member since Sep 2011
2340 posts
Posted on 10/22/24 at 6:30 pm to
Andrea's recap from the courtroom today: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lJhu8XHJQk
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
7946 posts
Posted on 10/22/24 at 7:18 pm to
quote:

I know it was likely at night, but I’m curious is there’s a reason the girls weren’t found the first day? It sounds like they were found across the creek from the bridge so many they just didn’t look that far?


I think you are right about being at night or dark. One testimony mentioned searching between midnight and 2am. Looking at maps app the area with trees isn’t some huge forest but seems consistently dense following both sides of the creek. At least from the video recording by the girl there are some hills around area. Searching around trees at night they might have just missed them covered by sticks or couldn’t coordinate grid searches to know what area hadn’t been checked. Some may have also relied on staying on side of creek and looking across creek with flashlights (bridge had been abandoned and not built for people to cross over and some may not have felt comfortable crossing back and forth at night). I can’t remember if dogs involved but search seemed less diligent and not very coordinated on top of it being dark as they were missing at that point with little or no evidence of foul play yet.


Description of one search that night and then the next day not seeing bodies walking up to creek even after told before arriving that bodies possibly were found.
quote:

Giancola began looking for the girls at midnight, and couldn’t see much in the woods even with using a flashlight. He noted to the jury that he saw a “disturbance” near the end of the high bridge where bare ground could be seen. He said he pointed it out to a nearby firefighter, but eventually ended his search at 2 a.m. Feb. 14.

State prosecutor Nick McLelland asked Giancola is “at the point you ended the search at 2 a.m., where you investigating a murder?”

Giancola said, “No,” adding that he didn’t believe anything bad had happened to the girls at that point…

… said after arriving at the creek, he was shown Libby German’s tie-dye shirt and shoes found in the creek. Someone then informed him the girls’ bodies were behind him. He said he could not see the bodies when walking to the creek, but saw something “white.”


They didn’t collect the sticks covering the bodies for 3 weeks seemingly because they didn’t see blood on them or have anything else obvious to people at the scene.
quote:

Datzman also said the sticks on the bodies “were of no evidentiary value” and did not have blood on them. The sticks were were collected about three weeks later and placed in evidence storage at the state police post in Lafayette. The sticks were not tested for DNA.
This post was edited on 10/22/24 at 7:29 pm
Posted by pioneerbasketball
Team Bunchie
Member since Oct 2005
139098 posts
Posted on 10/22/24 at 7:24 pm to
is this guy connected to any other crimes?

Doesn't seem likely he would just kill these girls randomly without doing it before
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
22391 posts
Posted on 10/22/24 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

is this guy connected to any other crimes? Doesn't seem likely he would just kill these girls randomly without doing it before


The guy lived within miles of the murder site. Certainly very bizarre, but I gotta assume the police have done their due diligence on this.

In relation to moving the bodies around, these were 13 and 14 year old girls. They probably didn’t weigh 100 lbs or so. It wouldn’t have been horribly difficult to just fireman’s carry them or something similar and not have much of a noticeable disturbance. I just mean we aren’t talking about 250 lb men.
Posted by grizzlylongcut
Member since Sep 2021
12488 posts
Posted on 10/22/24 at 8:50 pm to
From my understanding when I listened to a podcast about these murders, whoever did this did some absolutely horrific things to those poor girls.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
7946 posts
Posted on 10/22/24 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

In relation to moving the bodies around, these were 13 and 14 year old girls. They probably didn’t weigh 100 lbs or so. It wouldn’t have been horribly difficult to just fireman’s carry them or something similar and not have much of a noticeable disturbance. I just mean we aren’t talking about 250 lb men.


Outside of someone parking in a random spot and going thru the woods and hiding to wait on victims Seems to have had enough on trail along with it’s design that someone would have seen 2 girls with the a guy who looked like the guy in the video. Multiple people reported seeing same guy or some similar guy not yet identified.

Not impossible but I think moving them back is only going to be a defense ploy to try to seed some doubt along hair from one of the victim’s family which just transferred to hand between either being forced to take clothes off or putting some back on. I think someone has mentioned one of the girls had stayed over at the others and was wearing something of the others before even encountering the killer.

In this line the defense also asked about some random shoe prints one of the witnesses also saw when looking for the girls and have or will question why the phone quit pinging at that location overnight. The phone deal is strange, but the other stuff so far seems to just trying to question random stuff to piece together unconnected items as an alternative story.
This post was edited on 10/22/24 at 9:17 pm
Posted by Splackavellie
Bayou
Member since Oct 2017
11205 posts
Posted on 10/22/24 at 9:19 pm to
Wasn't his car on camera from a convenience store a couple of times that seems to fit the time frame from when the murders occurred?

It's been a while since I've read anything about the case but I seem to remember something like that.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
20943 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 4:02 am to
[quote]Andrea's recap from the courtroom today: LINK ]
Been trying to watch some of her stuff to get info on this trial but her videos are long. Wish she published cliff notes. ETA - she seems convinced that the judge is very much pro-prosecution and has mention various objections made by prosecutors during cross-examination where the judge approved of the objection despite it technically not being appropriate. Curious to see if such things lead to a strong appeal if this guy is convicted.
This post was edited on 10/23/24 at 4:16 am
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
61195 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 7:17 am to
quote:

In relation to moving the bodies around, these were 13 and 14 year old girls. They probably didn’t weigh 100 lbs or so. It wouldn’t have been horribly difficult to just fireman’s carry them or something similar and not have much of a noticeable disturbance. I just mean we aren’t talking about 250 lb men.


One girl was bigger and weighed 200 pounds. And this dude is 5’4”. I think I gathered that the defense’s theory is that there was a car waiting on a private drive just past where they were found, they were moved, then brought back, but alive and killed around the place where they were abducted. Doesn’t make much sense, but they have to account for the girls being wet, which means they would have have to cross the creek after they were abducted.

Also makes no sense to for anybody, whether they were dead or alive, to have brought them back and dumped them right in the middle of where a huge search was already underway. There are tons of places in the area they could have been left without anybody being around.

I don’t know if y’all watch Gray Hughes—he’s got a channel, and I’ve caught some streams on this and the Idaho case. He’s a condescending a-hole, but has a good head for this stuff, and does some really cool re-enactments and other things on his computer. He’s got a pretty good timeline down based on witness reports and cars caught on camera passing a building.

Anyway, he’s got connections and has seen the crime scene photos. He said the red-head (smaller girl, I get their names mixed up) who had the other girls pants on, was found clutching her sweater up against her chest, like she was cold. I think the high that day was in the 40s and they were wet. I don’t know if this came out this week or in previous hearings, but police believe it took her longer to die. He thinks dude made them both get naked—I think that’s pretty obvious—but she actually was barely alive, but managed the strength to grab the bigger girls pants and put them on in attempt to stay warm. So that makes more sense than him redressing her in the other girls clothes for some weird reason.

Also, dude was doing fine in jail, being normal for weeks/months and found Jesus. Began passing out bibles to other inmates. He was filled with guilt and wanted redemption, so he could be with his family in the afterlife/Heaven. That’s when he 1st confessed to his wife and mom—he thought that was the only way he could be reconnected with them. And it’s in those confessions where he mentioned things only the killer would have known. They told him to shut up.

Soon after, his lawyer visited him and brought all the discovery from the prosecution and they met for days/a week, whatever. It was only then that he started to act all bat-shite crazy and rubbing his feces on himself, eating paper, just acting all looney-tunes. Then he started confessing to inmates and guards and that’s when he started throwing shite in his confessions that were wrong, that never happened. He had to murky the waters after he fricked up and gave the “real confession” with things only the killer would know. And I don’t know where this stat came from, but something like 80% of the corrections officers and other inmates thought he was faking being crazy.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
61195 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 7:18 am to
Oh yeah, he confessed over 60 times.
Posted by schatman
Montana
Member since Nov 2018
2913 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 8:14 am to
quote:

absolutely horrific things


What's the gist?
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
49049 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:13 am to
quote:

[quote]Andrea's recap from the courtroom today: LINK ]
Been trying to watch some of her stuff to get info on this trial but her videos are long. Wish she published cliff notes.



She seems to be thorough, but so very long. I skip through some things, but I also may miss something that way.

Is there a good source to read summaries of the day?

Posted by Poichess
Member since Jun 2019
1112 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:52 pm to
Today, there was extensive discussion about phones. The defense claims that there is no phone forensics connecting Richard Allen to the girls. Meanwhile, the state revealed that they examined 23 of Richard Allen’s devices in 2022, but were unable to find the phone used in 2017.
Posted by Poichess
Member since Jun 2019
1112 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

In relation to moving the bodies around, these were 13 and 14 year old girls. They probably didn’t weigh 100 lbs or so. It wouldn’t have been horribly difficult to just fireman’s carry them or something similar and not have much of a noticeable disturbance. I just mean we aren’t talking about 250 lb men.

The dude was the same height as the girls 5’4” and one of the girls weighed 200 lbs
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
36591 posts
Posted on 10/23/24 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

The dude was the same height as the girls 5’4” and one of the girls weighed 200 lbs
Please source where one of the girls weighed 200 pounds. Because at 5'3" neither did.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 29
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 29Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram