Started By
Message

Death With Dignity

Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:15 pm
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:15 pm
Im curious about people who oppose death with dignity where it would be allowed for people of sound mind, etc. Why cant a person decide that they don't want to fight to the very end and instead opt to go out in peace when they see fit. Instead of spending all that money in the final months (almost seems like this benefits the medical lobby and not individuals), they can pass it on to their loved ones.

The fight against death is a losing battle - in history and in literature/storytelling we celebrate people who choose their final stand on their own ground - people should be allowed to make that same decision.

I seems like fthe extreme fear of death and aversion to discussing our own fatality that is the cause of the aversion to death with dignity. It seems odd that we are expected to fight to the bitter end against the inevitable. This fight is likely for the benefit of our family and loved ones - and i question whether it is even a benefit.

Im sitting up with my dog hoping to get him in to be put down tomorrow and it has me thinking on why i wouldn't be allowed to make this decision for myself.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
One State Solution
Member since May 2012
55616 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:16 pm to
My 3rd great aunt was given a 99.999% chance of death at age 75 but lived for another 20 years so I’m against it
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
41906 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:17 pm to
You can choose NOT to take extreme measures to keep yourself alive.

ie: Chemo

However, suicide is another story
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:19 pm to
But shouldnt she have been allowed to make that decision herself - again with mental capacity to make that decision a given.?

The law of large numbers says that the vast majority of people in the same situation suffered for a while before succumbing to the inevitable- which is their choice. i just think they should have that choice
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:21 pm to
Choosing not to take extreme measures means my dog would likely be alive for another week in pain and misery so I am taking him to end it early. Is there a reason i shouldnt be able to make that same choice for myself?
Posted by Ghost of Colby
Alberta, overlooking B.C.
Member since Jan 2009
11197 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:26 pm to
I think human consciousness, is a tragic misstep in evolution. We became too self-aware, nature created an aspect of nature separate from itself, we are creatures that should not exist by natural law. We are things that labor under the illusion of having a self; an accretion of sensory, experience and feeling, programmed with total assurance that we are each somebody, when in fact everybody is nobody. Maybe the honorable thing for our species to do is deny our programming, stop reproducing, walk hand in hand into extinction, one last midnight - brothers and sisters opting out of a raw deal."
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73681 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

. Is there a reason i shouldnt be able to make that same choice for myself?


From a legal standpoint, yes. From a moral, not really. Depending on your deity.
Posted by Martini
Near Athens
Member since Mar 2005
48840 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:27 pm to
No one dies with dignity unfortunately.
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:29 pm to
Dignity as a relative term in this case - really it means is it necessary to suffer the indignity of the final period of a really tough illness
Posted by JumpingTheShark
America
Member since Nov 2012
22902 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:32 pm to
Who says indignity is inherent in suffering?
Posted by TooFyeToFly
Atlanta, Georgia
Member since Nov 2012
1243 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:35 pm to
I'm with you man. It seems like a natural right to me.
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:37 pm to
That is valid but not really the point death with dignity / death without suffering can be used interchangeably as meaning the same thing. Death with dignity is just the common wording Death without suffering is the more applicable phrase.
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
41906 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

Choosing not to take extreme measures means my dog would likely be alive for another week in pain and misery so I am taking him to end it early. Is there a reason i shouldnt be able to make that same choice for myself?


I don't think you understood my response.

And choosing to take an animal out of misery is totally different than a human.
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:42 pm to
I didnt think you were saying i shouldnt be putting him down - i just am curious why you think a human shouldnt make that choice?

I understand that there are some religous reasons but just wondering about peoples reasoning. I enjoy these conversations so am not offended.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36040 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

Why cant a person decide that they don't want to fight to the very end and instead opt to go out in peace when they see fit

They can. The legal question is should a third-party be allowed to assist in the act without having to face criminal punishment? And if they can, how do you prevent interested third-parties from manipulating the situation either via undue influence or outright murder?
This post was edited on 11/24/20 at 8:43 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260483 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

Death With Dignity


Such a stupid label.

I've seen many suffer and have great dignity. I support taking yourself out if you choose, but the title is misleading and dumb.
Posted by BlackCoffeeKid
Member since Mar 2016
11714 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:45 pm to
Today I fricked Up for telling my dad it's time to Euthanize him.
Pretty funny story via r/TIFU

TLDR: While being sleepdrunk I woke up my dad and told him we get to do his Euthanasia later this morning. He took it a bit too literal.
This post was edited on 11/24/20 at 8:51 pm
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:45 pm to
I agree its just the phrasing ive heard before. Its not something im well versed in.
Posted by Sneaky__Sally
Member since Jul 2015
12364 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

They can. The legal question is should a third-party be allowed to assist in the act without having to face criminal punishment? And if they can, how do you prevent interested third-parties from manipulating the situation either via undue influence or outright murder


Is this in particular states? I read about a sort of "death pod" people could use somewhere in Europe but i didnt think the US allowed anything of the sort
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
136811 posts
Posted on 11/24/20 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

why i wouldn't be allowed to make this decision for myself.


because the government wants to control you until the end.....and beyond

Their would have to be a waiting period with permits and licenses.
This post was edited on 11/24/20 at 8:50 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram