- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dallas PD Guyger Trial: Guilty of Murder..Sentence to 10years in prison
Posted on 10/3/19 at 8:47 am to lsupride87
Posted on 10/3/19 at 8:47 am to lsupride87
quote:
Regardless of the wordplay of manslaughter or murder in the respective states, Guyer deserves more time in prison
And the court system disagrees with Mr. Tigerdroppings poster.
2
Posted on 10/3/19 at 8:47 am to lsupride87
quote:
Guyer deserves more time in prison
If they would have given her 50 years I'm pretty sure they would appeal and most likely get a Manslaughter conviction. Is that what you want? Because I'm pretty sure they're not going to try to appeal this conviction.Saves everybody a bunch of time and money in the process as well.
Posted on 10/3/19 at 8:47 am to TH03
quote:
And the court system disagrees with Mr. Tigerdroppings poster.
bunch of dumbasses!
Posted on 10/3/19 at 8:49 am to Bedhog
quote:
If they would have given her 50 years I'm pretty sure they would appeal and most likely get a Manslaughter conviction. Is that what you want? Because I'm pretty sure they're not going to try to appeal this conviction.Saves everybody a bunch of time and money in the process as well.
Hey let's not bring more facts into this.
Posted on 10/3/19 at 8:51 am to TH03
10 years actually served would have been a a much better sentence. That would require at least a 20 year sentence.
Posted on 10/3/19 at 8:51 am to TH03
quote:you're agreeing with the dude bringing up "50 years" (argument no one made). Hell the prosecution only askes for 28
Hey let's not bring more facts into this.
Posted on 10/3/19 at 8:52 am to castorinho
quote:
you're agreeing with the dude bringing up "50 years" (argument no one made). Hell the prosecution only askes for 28
And that negates the overall point....how?
Posted on 10/3/19 at 8:52 am to TH03
quote:The court system? You mean the jury?
And the court system disagrees with Mr. Tigerdroppings poster.
I am completely fine with having a different opinion that a random jury of your average Americans
This post was edited on 10/3/19 at 8:53 am
Posted on 10/3/19 at 8:52 am to castorinho
quote:28 and they would have appealed. Hell, looks like the idiots might still appeal. LINK
you're agreeing with the dude bringing up "50 years" (argument no one made). Hell the prosecution only askes for 28
That's stupid a hell if they do.
Posted on 10/3/19 at 8:53 am to Salamander_Wilson
quote:
Gotta say, I’m touched by the victim’s brother’s words and his hugging the shooter.
Ever had a moment when you see someone that is no doubt a better person than you are. I have watched the brother's statement and hugging Guyger about 20 times. I can't say for sure, I would be able to do that if I was in his shoes. That is a great man, it also is sad that his brother is not in this world any longer if he was like his little brother.
Posted on 10/3/19 at 8:54 am to lsupride87
quote:
You mean the jury?
In other words a part of the court system?
quote:
I am completely fine with having a different opinion
quote:
lsupride87
No shite.
Posted on 10/3/19 at 8:55 am to TH03
quote:unless you believe ten year was somehow the defense's threshold for appeal, it negates the whole resources point.
And that negates the overall point....how?
Posted on 10/3/19 at 8:56 am to TH03
quote:No. The court system would be me disagreeing with the way a law is written or the way a trial is conducted
In other words a part of the court system?
Disagreeing with the opinion of a jury is not disagreeing with the court system. I pray you can tell the difference
quote:You think disagreeing with a jury is a unique thing?
No shite.
Posted on 10/3/19 at 8:59 am to lsupride87
quote:
No. The court system would be me disagreeing with the way a law is written
Courts don't write laws, so no, that wouldn't be.
quote:
Disagreeing with the opinion of a jury is not disagreeing with the court system. I pray you can tell the difference
So this is the part where we start arguing convoluted semantics instead of just admitting a jury is a part of the court system so my statement is 100% correct?
Posted on 10/3/19 at 9:01 am to TH03
I can't deal with people just wanting to be right about everything and not debating without insults. I'm out.
Posted on 10/3/19 at 9:03 am to TH03
quote:I dont have issue or disagree with the Texas court system though
So this is the part where we start arguing convoluted semantics instead of just admitting a jury is a part of the court system so my statement is 100% correct?
I disagree with the jury's opinion in this case
I also dont disagree or have issues with the CA court system, but I disagree with the jurys verdict in the OJ case
I was just clarifying to others, do to your poor grasp of language, I dont disagree with the system and how it played out here. Just dont share the opinion of the jury
This post was edited on 10/3/19 at 9:04 am
Posted on 10/3/19 at 9:04 am to lsupride87
quote:
10 years is a joke
Because The jury understands the human psychology behind the crime she got a lesser sentence . Like we understand a mother who leaves her child in a car by accident. Depending on the details it may be ridiculously negligent and criminal, but we get that it’s different than somebody who planned a murder. We recognize the whole series of mistakes and negligence that led up to it and how it happened and we put that in perspective. We categorize it. And we factor in if she is a likely threat in the future and if it serves any constructive purpose to imprison her for a decade or more. And whether she demonstrates true remorse and regret for what she did. Whereas if she’d planned it I would have favored the death penalty. Basically we demonstrate our ability to REASON by factoring in these other things.
If she’s on the streets in five years that seems reasonable to me in the moral sense. Legally- I’m not qualified to say. I haven’t looked into it enough.
This post was edited on 10/3/19 at 9:11 am
Posted on 10/3/19 at 9:05 am to Bedhog
quote:I understand your point, but I couldnt have only sentenced to 10 if I am on that jury
28 and they would have appealed. Hell, looks like the idiots might still appeal. LINK
That's stupid a hell if they do
I likely would have gone with the 28 the prosecution asked for
Posted on 10/3/19 at 9:06 am to Lsupimp
quote:Jury did the sentence though...
Because The judge understands the human psychology behind the crime she got a lesser sentence
Posted on 10/3/19 at 9:07 am to Lsupimp
The whole of your post is great, but it's a jury sentencing.
Page 48 of 49
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News