
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Daily Mail: Noah’s Ark resting place 100% confirmed
Posted on 9/23/26 at 7:50 pm to LChama
Posted on 9/23/26 at 7:50 pm to LChama
quote:
Nothing will prove it to you. Just like i said in my original statement. You asked for more examples and i gave you more. Surprise no acknowledgement but only “one of the ones on the list was the one i gave you”.
So, what if I gave you examples of historical facts presented in the Bhagavad Gita and Qur’an. Would you then be willing to believe the theology of Hinduism and Islam?
It’s obvious that you didn’t even read the AI asian that you posted.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 8:00 pm to Gusoline
quote:
Should be illegal to make factual claims with nothing but heresay and no testing of actual evidence.
modern media meet Gusoline.
Gusoline meet modern media.
Find a story that fits the narrative.
Run it 24/7 for as long as it fits the narrative.
The moment the facts stop cooperating, quietly bury it, pretend the original coverage never happened, and under no circumstances admit you got it wrong.
Covington Catholic
Jussie Smollett race hoax
Hunter Biden’s laptop being “Russian disinformation”
Del Rio Border Patrol whipping “Haitian migrants”
“Hands Up Don’t Shoot”
Duke Lacrosse Team
etc
etc
etc
Posted on 9/23/26 at 8:31 pm to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
Why weren’t these people wiped out by the global flood?
They dont predate the flood. My dad’s area of expertise is Indian trade guns. Analyzing through election microscope the welds on buried rifles. Which was French which was English. There is a way to distinguish, but you obviously aren’t interested in that.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 8:36 pm to Shamoan
quote:
They dont predate the flood.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 8:53 pm to LChama
This is one of those things that is similar to the shroud of tourin. I was HIGHLY skeptical when I first heard of it. Was thrown the line that it was a middle century fake and wrote it off as a Catholic attempt at fabricating a genuine ancient relic. Years later, it turns out that the shroud’s sample was taken from a corner that didn’t have matching fibers with the rest of the artifact and was determined to be a middle aged patch. The relic did in fact contain pollen from Jerusalem circa the time of Christ, evidence of traumatized blood matching the line of David (AB), and an image that is completely incapable of reproduction even with the most modern advances in technology. The smartest people in the world, (obviously outside of tigerdroppings), can’t replicate it or explain it. Is it the burial linen of Jesus Christ? I do not know, but the more I know about it, the more it seems plausible.
Before you argue with me, I’ve watched this as a skeptic…I urge you to do the same. Don’t be afraid of challenging your beliefs. Watch the video. I do not endorse teachings of Josh Howerton necessarily, however he does give a shroud expert on this particular podcast.
And before you scoff, truly ask yourself with the mind open to understanding, how was this image on this burial cloth created? Comments posted within an hour and a half will not be responded to, as obviously you have not taken the challenge to watch the full video.
Before you argue with me, I’ve watched this as a skeptic…I urge you to do the same. Don’t be afraid of challenging your beliefs. Watch the video. I do not endorse teachings of Josh Howerton necessarily, however he does give a shroud expert on this particular podcast.
And before you scoff, truly ask yourself with the mind open to understanding, how was this image on this burial cloth created? Comments posted within an hour and a half will not be responded to, as obviously you have not taken the challenge to watch the full video.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 9:01 pm to Mo Jeaux
I’m referring my father’s area of expertise. He’s a published author and has several books on the subject. I was probably around the age of 10 when I went to my first archaeological dig. He’s recently gotten quite ill (age/dementia) and I have boxes upon boxes of ancient Indian artifacts that I’ve taken from his home and tried to preserve from the dump. So many I don’t know what to do or even what everything is. He was/is a great man. He was/is a believer in Christ and has forgotten more about Native American culture than you could absorb in 1000 years of your existence.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 9:03 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
There wasn’t a leap. I asked a question. And you made a statement on a message board. Getting responses is kind of the point.
You asked a leading question prob looking for a gotcha.
And no, comments are the purpose of message boards. Asking opinions seems a little off.
Have fun.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 9:04 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
tough blow for our edgelord atheists.
Oh come on, please don’t tell me you buy this nonsensical grift
Posted on 9/23/26 at 9:07 pm to Shamoan
quote:
has forgotten more about Native American culture than you could absorb in 1000 years of your existence.
Well, that’s literally impossible. I’m sorry about your dad, but without the sophistry this time, answer the question.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 9:09 pm to Sams Crow
quote:
You asked a leading question prob looking for a gotcha.
And no, comments are the purpose of message boards. Asking opinions seems a little off.
Have fun.
Oh good lord.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 9:10 pm to hawgfaninc
Known about that place since the 60s when they said it was simply a strange geological formation. They drilled and found nothing
Posted on 9/23/26 at 9:11 pm to Shamoan
quote:
16 minutes in.
He wont do it. He knows what he knows. Im married to one.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 9:12 pm to Shamoan
quote:
16 minutes in.
No sophistry. I’m not watching your video. You stated that native Americans didn’t predate “the flood”. Support your statement.
I get what you’re doing in this thread. I’m asking you to be honest. Keep your eye on the ball.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 9:13 pm to LChama
quote:
He wont do it.
I won’t do what? Your buddy made a statement. I asked a question about it. He won’t answer it.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 9:15 pm to Gusoline
quote:Yeah I hate shite like this.
Should be illegal to make factual claims with nothing but heresay and no testing of actual evidence.
Typically, you get an article and people break it down.
But in this case the fricking article itself doesn't even match the title. What are we even doing here
Posted on 9/23/26 at 9:16 pm to PCRammer
quote:
4,300 years ago
I'm a fairly literal Bible believing Christian but I'm supposed to believe there was a global flood as late as 2300 BC? That just makes zero sense given the documented historical record we have
Posted on 9/23/26 at 9:19 pm to Mo Jeaux
Challenge your beliefs. Dont be a pussy.
And fwiw, I said my dad’s area of expertise in Indian trade guns predated the flood. Comprehension matters.
And fwiw, I said my dad’s area of expertise in Indian trade guns predated the flood. Comprehension matters.
Posted on 9/23/26 at 9:19 pm to Wishnitwas1998
quote:
but I'm supposed to believe there was a global flood as late as 2300 BC? That just makes zero sense given the documented historical record we have
You are correct.
None of the people promoting this idea (but pretending they're not) have addressed this.

Popular
Back to top


0








