- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: D-Day Spinoff: Did the Allies Really Win WW2?
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:19 pm to Bout_Dat_Lyfe
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:19 pm to Bout_Dat_Lyfe
My grandfather, born in the early 1900s, always said we should have teamed up with Germany and fought the Russians. I'm not sure if that was a common thought in the 1940s or not.
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:19 pm to Bout_Dat_Lyfe
quote:
communism has spread worldwide

Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:20 pm to Worldly Bum
quote:
Yes, because it has nothing to do with the outcome of wwii. Stop being g a stupid person.
You're the dumbass, we allied with the communists shithead.
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:21 pm to greenbean
quote:Pretty much right, but Wall Street funded the bolshiviks and they would never go against their own kind.
My grandfather, born in the early 1900s, always said we should have teamed up with Germany and fought the Russians. I'm not sure if that was a common thought in the 1940s or not.
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:21 pm to Bout_Dat_Lyfe
What the frick is your point lol
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:22 pm to Bout_Dat_Lyfe
quote:
Did the Allies Really Win WW2?

Why ask such a stupid question?
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:22 pm to Bout_Dat_Lyfe
quote:
but communism has spread worldwide
You think we were fighting communism in WW2?

Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:22 pm to Bout_Dat_Lyfe
quote:
So disregard the policies, it has to be the communist party running things? California, Washington, Oregon, etc all have communistic policies
Define communism.
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:23 pm to greenbean
quote:
My grandfather, born in the early 1900s, always said we should have teamed up with Germany and fought the Russians. I'm not sure if that was a common thought in the 1940s or not.
Patton advocated for arming the surrendering Wehrmacht and use them to help attack the Soviets. It’s one reason why he was removed from command. Churchill had plan drawn up to attack Russia and drive them out of Eastern Europe, too, but Britain was far too war weary for that.
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:24 pm to greenbean
quote:
sure if that was a common thought in the 1940s or not.
Oh, it crossed many minds.
That was a time, you fight or be killed.
We have it easy now compared to the early 1900's.
This post was edited on 6/7/24 at 3:26 pm
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:25 pm to Worldly Bum
quote:
What the frick is your point lol
Western nations lost their national sovereignty and industrial bases ever since "winning" WW2. Those aren't signs of winning a war.
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:27 pm to Tmcgin
quote:How does putin factor into any of this, fig?
Yes we won
Sorry Putin is losing and the conspiracy bug has you mentally under the weather.
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:29 pm to Bout_Dat_Lyfe
The allied nations won, but for many, especially the UK, it was a pyrrhic victory. The war bankrupted most of the European powers and destroyed their empires.
The U.S. and USSR absolutely won and dominated the world for the next 50 years, and they took many fascists and incorporated them into their bureaucracies.
However, the real winner, philosophically, was managerialism. Basically, the style of nationalistic ethnic fascism of Germany failed, but the successful economic aspects of it and the organizational principles had enabled Germany to punch well above its weight in the war. The Soviet communist economic policy was a disaster, but its focus on social class rather than ethnicity allowed for greater social cohesion. Both utilized a secret police and intense authoritarianism to keep their populations in line.
Managerial fascism combines the government cooperation between government and big business with the social values of marxism. Marxism is utopian, but managerialism is fatalistic. It seeks to portray an existential crisis which only they can prevent. The end result was the creation of an ever-expanding bureaucratic managerial system which slowly swallowed the West’s economy. The managers produce nothing, but suck up all of the overhead and stifle innovation, resulting in slow decline rather than rapid booms and busts. The managerial class has largely consumed the middle classes and destroyed the small business entrepreneurs. It is currently dismantling the arts and entertainment industries with tech following closely behind. The managers now have an orwellian cyberpunk dystopia where the gap between rich and poor is widening while the middle class vanishes. Few middle class people are left who aren’t part of this manager class.
We have, since the end of the Cold War, seen the death of the liberal democracy. Principles like freedom of speech, freedom of expression, religious liberty, and free enterprise have been replaced with equity. That’s because while equality can be granted with the stroke of a pen, equity is impossible, and must require constant oversight to be effectuated. Thus, the managers push equity and get the poor to fight each other instead of them. Western Civilization has thus become disillusioned with itself and is committing cultural suicide by simply refusing to reproduce. I argue that this shift in fertility is largely economic, but regardless of the cause, the social consequences are drastic.
The reality is, no regular people really came out ahead. Some wealthy businessmen and connected bureaucrats got rich, but the ordinary citizens (and civilization in general) lost WWII in a big way.
The U.S. and USSR absolutely won and dominated the world for the next 50 years, and they took many fascists and incorporated them into their bureaucracies.
However, the real winner, philosophically, was managerialism. Basically, the style of nationalistic ethnic fascism of Germany failed, but the successful economic aspects of it and the organizational principles had enabled Germany to punch well above its weight in the war. The Soviet communist economic policy was a disaster, but its focus on social class rather than ethnicity allowed for greater social cohesion. Both utilized a secret police and intense authoritarianism to keep their populations in line.
Managerial fascism combines the government cooperation between government and big business with the social values of marxism. Marxism is utopian, but managerialism is fatalistic. It seeks to portray an existential crisis which only they can prevent. The end result was the creation of an ever-expanding bureaucratic managerial system which slowly swallowed the West’s economy. The managers produce nothing, but suck up all of the overhead and stifle innovation, resulting in slow decline rather than rapid booms and busts. The managerial class has largely consumed the middle classes and destroyed the small business entrepreneurs. It is currently dismantling the arts and entertainment industries with tech following closely behind. The managers now have an orwellian cyberpunk dystopia where the gap between rich and poor is widening while the middle class vanishes. Few middle class people are left who aren’t part of this manager class.
We have, since the end of the Cold War, seen the death of the liberal democracy. Principles like freedom of speech, freedom of expression, religious liberty, and free enterprise have been replaced with equity. That’s because while equality can be granted with the stroke of a pen, equity is impossible, and must require constant oversight to be effectuated. Thus, the managers push equity and get the poor to fight each other instead of them. Western Civilization has thus become disillusioned with itself and is committing cultural suicide by simply refusing to reproduce. I argue that this shift in fertility is largely economic, but regardless of the cause, the social consequences are drastic.
The reality is, no regular people really came out ahead. Some wealthy businessmen and connected bureaucrats got rich, but the ordinary citizens (and civilization in general) lost WWII in a big way.
This post was edited on 6/7/24 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:29 pm to Bout_Dat_Lyfe
quote:
California, Washington, Oregon, etc all have communistic policies
You can not seriously be this stupid
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:29 pm to Bout_Dat_Lyfe
quote:
Western nations lost their national sovereignty and industrial bases ever since "winning" WW2. Those aren't signs of winning a war
You should work on putting your thoughts into some form of coherent posts. We won the war. That's not debatable.
You just don't like the direction the country or the west has gone since the end of the war. They are two different subjects. Stop trying to conflate the two.
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:30 pm to Tmcgin
quote:
Sorry Putin is losing
No he's not. You are losing as a taxpayer contributing to Ukraine
Ukraine will not win this war.
The United States is on standby to rebuild Ukraine. Ever heard of Military Industrial Complex? They are starving for some business.
A war in their minds needs to happen roughly every 20 years.
Frick off until you actually see what is going down.
I am not wrong. You are.
This post was edited on 6/7/24 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:32 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
The typical boomer answer is "We aren't speaking German" but communism has spread worldwide
You do realize the communists were our “allies” in WW2.
Of course we won. Germany and Japan surrendered and neither are a threat currently
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:33 pm to Bout_Dat_Lyfe
quote:
I wonder...hmmm. No western country has national autonomy anymore, is that what they fought for?
Not sure what point you are trying to make.
We clearly won WW2. The current state of the world doesn’t change that.
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:35 pm to Worldly Bum
quote:
ou should work on putting your thoughts into some form of coherent posts. We won the war. That's not debatable.
You just don't like the direction the country or the west has gone since the end of the war. They are two different subjects. Stop trying to conflate the two.
What does winning a war look like to you? Do winners abdicate authority of their finance, borders, military and industrial base to organizations outside of their nation?
Posted on 6/7/24 at 3:36 pm to Pikes Peak Tiger
quote:The current state of the world is a direct result of us winning the war. You guys are too retarded to understand.
Not sure what point you are trying to make.
We clearly won WW2. The current state of the world doesn’t change that
Back to top
