0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Cornell University Situation Is Going To Turn Into Another Duke Lacrosse Case Isn't It?
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:55 am to LNCHBOX
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:55 am to LNCHBOX
He's acting like its not well documented what happened. It is extremely well documented. We know what happened.
She knows what happened.
She gave a long, extremely detailed report to police where no crimes were committed, because she got disinvited to a halloween party and was exposed as the campus whore.
She then, 2 years later, changed her story for money...by the way, she is NOT suing any of the guys. Do people know that?
She knows what happened.
She gave a long, extremely detailed report to police where no crimes were committed, because she got disinvited to a halloween party and was exposed as the campus whore.
She then, 2 years later, changed her story for money...by the way, she is NOT suing any of the guys. Do people know that?
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:55 am to LSUfan4444
quote:
I assumed you would’ve known I was talking about the incidents of the evening and question not after the fact
"hello police? There is a whore in our frat house."
Posted on 10/2/26 at 8:59 am to Fun Bunch
You asked me a question and I answered, if you consider that going on about something, that’s a new problem.
But again, to answer, I think it’s a shame to set morality standards in a line with legality. What happened in that fraternity house doesn’t have to be illegal to be predatory and incredibly poor judgment
I think those boys displayed a lack of morality that I personally find disgusting and disturbing. If I had a son in that room, I would be ashamed and disappointed in the man that I had been raising.
None of this makes those boys rapists and none of this absolves Jane Doe but you don’t have to be a rapist to be morally corrupt.
But again, to answer, I think it’s a shame to set morality standards in a line with legality. What happened in that fraternity house doesn’t have to be illegal to be predatory and incredibly poor judgment
I think those boys displayed a lack of morality that I personally find disgusting and disturbing. If I had a son in that room, I would be ashamed and disappointed in the man that I had been raising.
None of this makes those boys rapists and none of this absolves Jane Doe but you don’t have to be a rapist to be morally corrupt.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 9:01 am to LSUfan4444
quote:
I think it’s a shame to set morality standards in a line with legality
Who died and made you the morality police?
quote:
None of this makes those boys rapists and none of this absolves Jane Doe but you don’t have to be a rapist to be morally corrupt.
So did they rape her or not according to you?
Posted on 10/2/26 at 9:01 am to GVT
quote:
How could kids smart enough to get into Cornell be dumb enough to do something like this?
Because not matter how smart or dumb you are, it's human nature to believe it's never going to happen to them.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 9:02 am to LSUfan4444
Ok so what.
Your own personal morals are irrelevant, even if I agree in that regard. Because mine are irrelevant too.
They are being accused of fricking RAPE and having their lives completely ruined. Two of the guys that aren't even accused of doing anything tried to show up to campus and got harassed so much they had to leave
This is about legalities not your own personal code of morals
Your own personal morals are irrelevant, even if I agree in that regard. Because mine are irrelevant too.
They are being accused of fricking RAPE and having their lives completely ruined. Two of the guys that aren't even accused of doing anything tried to show up to campus and got harassed so much they had to leave
This is about legalities not your own personal code of morals
Posted on 10/2/26 at 9:02 am to LNCHBOX
quote:same as I told you yesterday. Because the role of a protector, whether referring to the Bible or any thriving society in the history of our planet, is accepted by men of high character and morals. It is the responsibility of those men to protect themselves and others from harm, even when it means protect protecting them from themselves.
Why is it their responsibility to protect her from willingly participating in sex?
It’s not a responsibility that is accepted by those of low morals and weak character and that is my criticism of them.
Does it make them rapists. It does make them morally, corrupt and weak in character.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 9:04 am to LSUfan4444
quote:
same as I told you yesterday. Because the role of a protector, whether referring to the Bible or any thriving society in the history of our planet, is accepted by men of high character and morals. It is the responsibility of those men to protect themselves and others from harm, even when it means protect protecting them from themselves.
It’s not a responsibility that is accepted by those of low morals and weak character and that is my criticism of them.
Does it make them rapists. It does make them morally, corrupt and weak in character.
So did they rape her or not?Posted on 10/2/26 at 9:04 am to Funky Tide 8
The Duke players denied sexual intercourse occurred, and there was no evidence to prove it.
In the Cornell case, sexual intercourse has been established already. But I don’t know the details on how many guys’ DNA would be present.
In the Cornell case, sexual intercourse has been established already. But I don’t know the details on how many guys’ DNA would be present.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 9:06 am to LSUfan4444
quote:
same as I told you yesterday. Because the role of a protector, whether referring to the Bible or any thriving society in the history of our planet, is accepted by men of high character and morals. It is the responsibility of those men to protect themselves and others from harm, even when it means protect protecting them from themselves.
It’s not a responsibility that is accepted by those of low morals and weak character and that is my criticism of them.
Does it make them rapists. It does make them morally, corrupt and weak in character.
This is bizarre shite. Your own personal code of morality is completely irrelevant
They are being accused of RAPE. They got fired from jobs and are out of school
The incredibly biased NY AG is now going to ruin their lives further
All for a complete lie
Posted on 10/2/26 at 9:06 am to Fun Bunch
Sorry, but I don’t give a shite what value you put on my personal views on the character of the boys in that room. If you don’t care, stop asking questions. Just down boat and move on.
I know you weren’t involved in yesterday’s conversation so I don’t expect you to know everything I said, but I’m not claiming to argue for or against their legal innocence or guilt
I don’t find it, particularly difficult to separate the legality and morality issue, but for some people, it is a bigger problem than it is for me.
I know you weren’t involved in yesterday’s conversation so I don’t expect you to know everything I said, but I’m not claiming to argue for or against their legal innocence or guilt
I don’t find it, particularly difficult to separate the legality and morality issue, but for some people, it is a bigger problem than it is for me.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 9:07 am to Fun Bunch
quote:if it’s so irrelevant why do you keep commenting? Why do you keep asking questions? Just download and move on or ignore it and move on. You and I don’t have to discuss the same thing for my view to be relevant or not.
Your own personal code of morality is completely irrelevant
Posted on 10/2/26 at 9:07 am to LSUfan4444
quote:
Sorry, but I don’t give a shite what value you put on my personal views on the character of the boys in that room. If you don’t care, stop asking questions. Just down boat and move on.
I know you weren’t involved in yesterday’s conversation so I don’t expect you to know everything I said, but I’m not claiming to argue for or against their legal innocence or guilt
I don’t find it, particularly difficult to separate the legality and morality issue, but for some people, it is a bigger problem than it is for me.
Is it more moral to be a willing participant in a gangbang or to ruin the lives of those willing participants with lies because you got shamed? Your selective morality says a lot about you.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 9:08 am to LSUfan4444
quote:
if it’s so irrelevant why do you keep commenting? Why do you keep asking questions? Just download and move on or ignore it and move on. You and I don’t have to discuss the same thing for my view to be relevant or not.
These are the kinds of posts you make when you realize you've been owned by logic. Talk about downvotes while you're it
Posted on 10/2/26 at 9:09 am to LNCHBOX
I’m not defending the woman at all, I’m just not defending the boys. Big difference but I haven’t really given it any thought as to what morally corrupt action is worse.
This post was edited on 10/2/26 at 9:09 am
Posted on 10/2/26 at 9:09 am to LSUfan4444
quote:
I’m not defending the woman at all
Ok, I'm done with youPosted on 10/2/26 at 9:10 am to LSUfan4444
Because what you are saying makes no logical sense, it is not germane to the discussion.
It is the typical Zoomer "I am the center of the universe" argument
This case is about LEGAL matters. It is about RAPE.
We know, without question, that the allegations in her civil suit differ wildly from what she told the police, and what she discussed with friends, and what she texted and snapchatted
That is what this is about.
The judgement on the moral character of the boys is not relevant.
It is the typical Zoomer "I am the center of the universe" argument
This case is about LEGAL matters. It is about RAPE.
We know, without question, that the allegations in her civil suit differ wildly from what she told the police, and what she discussed with friends, and what she texted and snapchatted
That is what this is about.
The judgement on the moral character of the boys is not relevant.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 9:11 am to LNCHBOX
Owned by logic? What logic is that? The logic that everything I’m saying is irrelevant and doesn’t matter yet you and your boyfriend can’t stop talking about it?
Posted on 10/2/26 at 9:11 am to LSUfan4444
quote:
I’m not defending the woman at all, I’m just not defending the boys
Well, this is dumb.
She is accusing them of RAPE.
Once a crime of that magnitude is alleged, once they have their lives completely ruined, the only issue is:
Did they rape her? And if not, it is perfectly ok to "defend them" even if you don't like that college kids had sex.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 9:12 am to LSUfan4444
quote:
The logic that everything I’m saying is irrelevant
Everything you say is not irrelevant.
Your disdain for college kids having sex and doing drugs is however in this case.
Because the issue is not whether what they did was immoral, certainly it is.
Page 14 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News