- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Charlie Kirk Assassinated at Utah Valley University
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:29 pm to RIPMachoMan
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:29 pm to RIPMachoMan
quote:
In no way shape or form should today EVER be acceptable but to act like he was attempting to bridge gaps across the aisle is a stretch at best
You hated him because he exposed your views as idiotic and without basis. He has debated more than just college kids.
1
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:29 pm to Clark14
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:29 pm to Pettifogger
Need to have a public hanging for the shooter. He shot Charlie in the the public so let give the same.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:29 pm to OMLandshark
Just logging back on. Any updates on the shooter?
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:29 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Authoritarian, mentally disturbed and incapable of listening to dissenting opinion
Sounds..familiar..
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:29 pm to Odysseus32
quote:
That's now what he was doing. Anyone with an ounce of brain matter knows that he went to college campuses to own people on camera to get rich. And before you retort, I'm telling you this. It's not really a debate. He could have done just as well owning conservatives as a leftist.
There was no truth to what he was doing. It was a grift.
Unsurprisingly a lot of you couldn't see that.
People like you are the problem in this country.
You choose to not like a fact based opinion so it's suddenly a grift or "antagonistic".
You will never see it but YOU are the problem and some serious self examination is needed.
This post was edited on 9/10/25 at 5:32 pm
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:30 pm to Macintosh
That's another tragedy of this. Charlie was a sincere Christian man. All of his debates centered around his faith first, and freedom second. He was getting a massive following on campuses, and I thought that was a great one to speak to the younger generation.
Now some loser like Fuentes may fill the void.
Now some loser like Fuentes may fill the void.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:30 pm to nugget
quote:
You hated him because he exposed your views as idiotic and without basis. He has debated more than just college kids.
Untrue. I’m a conservative sir
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:30 pm to The Pirate King
Got his arse
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:30 pm to Odysseus32
quote:
What he was doing was antagonistic and not at all "trying to have a conversation." It was trying to be correct.
That doesn't mean he should be killed, but to frame him as a Saint who was just looking for discourse is silly.
Get the frick out of here. There are thousands of hours of video of him talking to a variety of people and you’d be hard pressed to find any of it that has him starting out as antagonistic.
He talked at length on why he did what he did - he saw the young people in the country, especially young males, completely disenfranchised with whole system but inundated with leftist indoctrination. He felt that that he could sway more people by speaking to them directly and convincing them of a better way. He was the opposite of antagonistic and actually changed the views a shite load of people.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:31 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You are such a raging pussy
Brother, it's going to be okay.
I know this has got you all riled up. Just chill out, take a breath.
The issue with a lot of you is that you can't conceive duality. If one thing is black, it cannot be white. Try to stay with me here. I didn't mind Charlie Kirk. I thought what he was doing was funny. But at no point did I ever once think he was trying to bring discourse, because he wasn't. I'm pretty sick of all the killings, truth be told. But you retards need to get it through your heads that you're being played.
Right now.
Anything the media is writing is playing you because they know how heated you are.
Just chill.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:31 pm to Antonio Moss
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/1/26 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:31 pm to Proximo
Who did it??
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:31 pm to SidewalkTiger
My countryman, let's agree to disagree.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:31 pm to GRTiger
quote:yup Kirk is a saint in comparison to Fuentes. Nick is a much better debater
Now some loser like Fuentes may fill the void.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:32 pm to SEClint
quote:
m not a Democrat or affiliated with any political party. But if I were, and I went to republican areas, as a tour..and made a living by arguing and telling people that they were wrong, id expect not everyone would have a smile and a handshake.
Going to college campuses? You are beyond having any type of reasonable conversation.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:32 pm to SEClint
quote:
im not a Democrat or affiliated with any political party.
Right......
quote:
But if I were, and I went to republican areas, as a tour..and made a living by arguing and telling people that they were wrong, id expect not everyone would have a smile and a handshake.
If only the shooter had left it at that. Nobody said everyone must leave a political discussion with a smile and a handshake. A lot of these issues are very personal to some people and they get very emotional about them. There's no denying that. But that should never result in violence. Yet, some of you "moderates" maintain the position that he was asking for it. It's disgusting and says a lot about you as a person.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:32 pm to SEClint
quote:\
SEClint
I hope you have the day you deserve, cocksucker. Of course yo won't, because assholes like you rarely do
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:32 pm to 40 Rouge
quote:This.
Nah... there are plenty of clips where the debater poses good arguments and thoughtful discourse and Kirk was respectful and thankful for it.
He would often state that he will look into it more and he appreciates their argument.
The whole “he was antagonistic” argument comes from those who watch only TikTok clips of him, while claiming that those who like the man only watched TikTok clips.
Posted on 9/10/25 at 5:32 pm to Odysseus32
quote:
I thought what he was doing was funny. But at no point did I ever once think he was trying to bring discourse, because he wasn't
That’s because you are weak. The weak can’t handle debate. It’s ok. We all know now
Page 61 of 215
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News