Started By
Message

re: Can someone explain how charging for ER "facilities" and ER "physician services" works?

Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:55 pm to
Posted by SECdragonmaster
Order of the Dragons
Member since Dec 2013
17460 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 10:55 pm to
I don't think any of you are listening.

It has nothing to do with billing, physicians, etc.

It's because poor people with no self control spend days in the ER and hospital and then get discharged (never fill their prescriptions) and show back up within a week or two.

You are paying for all the free care.

It's just another form of socialism.
Posted by ZIGG
Member since Dec 2016
12044 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 11:13 pm to
Long story short the powers to be pull outrageous numbers out their arse so they can gain wealth. It all boils down to that.

So your daughter broke her neck on a ATV in the woods? frick you. Pay us 50k to get her airlifted and 5k every night she stays at our hospital.
Posted by LSUsmartass
Scompton
Member since Sep 2004
82755 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 11:17 pm to
Right, back to my original point...it's price gouging
Posted by BeaumontBengal
Member since Feb 2005
2377 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 11:22 pm to
Your original post concerns paying your deductible. Do you think you shouldn't have to pay your deductible?
Posted by LSUsmartass
Scompton
Member since Sep 2004
82755 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 11:30 pm to
No, my gripe is the wording about the coverage is very misleading. They'd have you believe that a $150 co-pay covers all of the ER services until they refer you to a manual which is very vague with its wording.
Posted by BeaumontBengal
Member since Feb 2005
2377 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 11:39 pm to
So your gripe is not price gouging as you've referenced multiple times in this thread. Sounds like you haven't met your deductible. I'd expect to be billed out of pocket until you reach your deductible.
Posted by YogaPants
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2008
4704 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 11:42 pm to
You get 12 different bills from 16 different entities
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53604 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 11:42 pm to
quote:


How in the hell is this legal?


If you are that pissed over that, imagine how mad you'll be when you pick a hospital because it's in-network, but when you get the bill all of the doctors were out of network and you were charged full price for a consult from a doctor you didn't feel you needed and didn't really have a role in your treatment.
This post was edited on 9/8/17 at 11:43 pm
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
15388 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 11:58 pm to
quote:

Right, back to my original point...it's price gouging



Do you want people qualified to deal with anything available all the time or some of the time? It isn't like the flight is available for $300 when you want a lift from home to the grocery store but $3000 from home to hospital. The flight and personnel are expensive. Two very simple alternative models exist: offer fully trained personnel less often than always or offer less trained personnel always.


So, I would tend to think most people prefer the "highly trained always" folks. This is aimed at them.
How are these people supposed to justify the amount of time and money required to be ready for anything at any time if not to be paid while waiting for wild things to walk through the door?


That isn't gouging... That's the cost of a nation thinking that things like people in car wrecks, gunshots, and industrial accidents deserve a shot at living from someone who has seen those things before. (I, too, don't believe that a lot of traumas should be death sentences, so I like that we have a system of highly trained individuals to deal with trauma available; this comes at a high cost, which is unfortunate from w monetary standpoint, but it's great from an "I'd like to get in my car and drive across America angle")





The real problem is this, which also isn't gouging. Most people have insurance. Insurance pays up to some number for procedure X or service y. If the bill is less than that, they pay the bill. Over that, they pay some maximum. The number changes from time to time and varies from insurance to insurance. There is also a requirement that you must charge the same amount for these procedures and services to each patient, regardless of their payer status. You can offer the service free of charge at your discretion, but you may not charge less than your set fee schedule to anyone, legally.
Reply from person and hospital who want the max reimbursement from all the companies that pay for it? Bill a stupid number that is high, collect all the maxes. The people affected most are those who don't have insurance.



The system is due for an overhaul in a big way, but it is quite cumbersome in its present state and would take a very big jolt to move in any direction. It will and needs to come, but for now, it's what we work in and a big part of the reason that things work the way they do.



None of the above attempts to defend the current system as "good" or "ideal" but is meant to attempt to explain how it works with some pros, cons, and explanations for its current state.


Posted by Mandocello
Beyond The Sun
Member since Mar 2008
201 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 12:33 am to
quote:

If you are that pissed over that, imagine how mad you'll be when you pick a hospital because it's in-network, but when you get the bill all of the doctors were out of network and you were charged full price for a consult from a doctor you didn't feel you needed and didn't really have a role in your treatment.



Please meet Harrison T. Mu - perhaps the worst piece of slime in the world of medicine.

It's a long article, but I'm sure you'll find it quite informative.

LINK


Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
23316 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 3:16 am to
quote:

when was the last time you have ever heard of a health insurance company losing money?




Last year. All of them lost millions on the exchange portion of their business. UHC chalked up $720 million in losses in 2015. BCBS of North Carolina lost $400 million. The company that operates BCBS in Texas and Illinois lost $240 million that year.

The shocking rise in premiums and deductibles over the past two years is to make up for those losses.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74900 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 3:23 am to
Ambulances may be the biggest scam of them all.
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
23316 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 3:32 am to
quote:

Long story short the powers to be pull outrageous numbers out their arse so they can gain wealth. It all boils down to that.

So your daughter broke her neck on a ATV in the woods? frick you. Pay us 50k to get her airlifted and 5k every night she stays at our hospital.





Because a Life Flight chopper and a level 1 trauma center should be free, right?

Moron.
Posted by zuluboudreaux
God’s country USA
Member since Jan 2008
1251 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 3:52 am to
quote:

Ambulances may be the biggest scam of them all.


Isn't using an ambulance a choice of the patient in most cases?
Is it supposed to be free?
$10000 for a ground ambulance as referenced in an earlier post does not sound realistic.
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
74900 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 4:56 am to
Not free.But not more than two weeks operating cost for one trip. That's a scam

Posted by LSUsmartass
Scompton
Member since Sep 2004
82755 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 8:25 am to
quote:

That isn't gouging... That's the cost of a nation thinking that things like people in car wrecks, gunshots, and industrial accidents deserve a shot at living from someone who has seen those things before. (I, too, don't believe that a lot of traumas should be death sentences, so I like that we have a system of highly trained individuals to deal with trauma available; this comes at a high cost, which is unfortunate from w monetary standpoint, but it's great from an "I'd like to get in my car and drive across America angle")

Sure it is.

Back before Obama care ruined everything, I had a procedure to remove a small mass in my back. The billed costs for everything was roughly 21k...the negotiated price my insurance paid was 2100. My only cost was a $50 co-pay, that tells me the markup on medical services is astronomical.
Posted by Restomod
Member since Mar 2012
13493 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 9:01 am to
quote:

It is also true that the ER is the bigest cash cow for the hospital. "Oh, you fell off a ladder and broke your arm?"

"Yep. And my head hurts."

Ok, you need a bazillion dollar cat scan.


Actually the ED is often the financial drain on the facility. The revenue producer is through the OR.

The majority of ED patients are are not insured or under insured leaving the facility holding the bag. The ED is the #1 point of entry with most not paying their bill which is causing this burden.
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
15388 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 9:25 am to
quote:

Back before Obama care ruined everything, I had a procedure to remove a small mass in my back. The billed costs for everything was roughly 21k...the negotiated price my insurance paid was 2100. My only cost was a $50 co-pay, that tells me the markup on medical services is astronomical.



That has nothing to do with the ACA and was happening long before it. See my post above- I explained in detail why costs are high. It's to capture reimbursement from the insurance companies. Cash pay gets screwed in the current system.
Posted by captainahab
Highway Trio8
Member since Dec 2014
1680 posts
Posted on 9/9/17 at 9:38 am to
quote:

"Yep. And my head hurts."

Ok, you need a bazillion dollar cat scan.


That bazillion dollar scan is because the doctor doesn't want to be sitting across the court room from Get Gordan.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram