- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Can anyone here admit that a lot of hardworking young people are fricked?
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:06 pm to MrSpock
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:06 pm to MrSpock
quote:
Perhaps they are the ones who convinced our parents, grandparents , Aunts, Uncles, mentors and teachers. I guess we should have had the foresight at 11 to shun all the grownups around us and opted for the welding academy.
This thread is about young people right? What’s stopping young people from changing careers if whatever they picked was wrong?
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:11 pm to UptownJoeBrown
“Again, zero solutions. Just bitching.”
If this is your input to this problem, which you say you acknowledge, you aren’t going to like their solution.
If this is your input to this problem, which you say you acknowledge, you aren’t going to like their solution.
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:13 pm to MrSpock
quote:
Perhaps they are the ones who convinced our parents, grandparents , Aunts, Uncles, mentors and teachers. I guess we should have had the foresight at 11 to shun all the grownups around us and opted for the welding academy.
His biggest mistake was saying “college loan corporations”. The biggest frickup ever made in education was taking student loans away from banks and allowing the govt to take over and guarantee the loan. University costs skyrocketed once that happened. I guess I can’t blame them. They’re getting free money on the backs of the kids they’re barely educating.
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:14 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
There are a hell of a lot of people that don’t have the luxury of being able to completely uproot their entire lives and move because the federal government decides to target their area for dropping off foreigners and destroying their community.
Sounds like it’s not a luxury. Sounds like a necessity. Move.
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:15 pm to Greenside
quote:
If this is your input to this problem, which you say you acknowledge, you aren’t going to like their solution.
Well, what is it? What are they personally going to do?
This post was edited on 11/22/25 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:27 pm to UptownJoeBrown
quote:
Sounds like it’s not a luxury. Sounds like a necessity. Move.
If you have $500 to your name and your car engine blows up, you can’t just go out and buy another one. Is it a necessity? Yes. Can you afford it? No.
I know you’re just trying to win the argument but there’s no need to be this willfully obtuse.
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:29 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
I’m almost starting to believe that this is the ultimate goal of the people making these decisions. Force people to constantly move so they can never have roots in any one spot and develop a local culture and community.
One nice thing about the interest rate whiplash is that there has been nearly zero turnover in my neighborhood. Despite it all being 3/2 starter ranches and nearly everyone having at least 2 kids since 2020.
Little economical forced community, it’s good for the kids
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:37 pm to UptownJoeBrown
I don’t think the way younger generations view boomers is much of a secret. They are the generation that normalized abandoning unwanted spouses and aborting unwanted children. They abandoned traditional sexual morality en masse in their youth. Then, when they grew older, they kept taxes low and benefits high during their prime earning years. Now that they are older, they shape policy to protect their assets and ensure their SSI checks keep coming. When they die, they will leave behind shattered public institutions and mountains of debt for the generations that follow.
And I say that as a person who likes the boomers for the most part. They have virtues too and were responsible for massive amounts of innovation and economic growth. It’s just the world they helped create is very individualistic and missing protective institutions like nation and family.
And I say that as a person who likes the boomers for the most part. They have virtues too and were responsible for massive amounts of innovation and economic growth. It’s just the world they helped create is very individualistic and missing protective institutions like nation and family.
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:41 pm to upgrayedd
Look, if their answer is they can’t do anything but just bitch, well then say so.
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:42 pm to _Hurricane_
Hardworking young people ?
I'll let you know if I ever meet one
I'll let you know if I ever meet one
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:44 pm to Prawn
Well if their solution is to elect a communist like that NY mayor, heaven help yall. Read Animal Farm or communism in history. Not such a good solution.
Is that what their solution is?
Is that what their solution is?
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:44 pm to UptownJoeBrown
quote:
Look, if their answer is they can’t do anything but just bitch, well then say so.
Everyone can do something no matter how small but to act as if they can get out of the massive quagmire that was created for them and is completely out of their hands by “just doing something” is about as retarded of an argument as you can make.
That’s like saying if the Germans would’ve just done something instead of bitching in Berlin in May of 1945, they could’ve won the war.
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:46 pm to upgrayedd
Again, no solutions. frick give me some! I tried to start but mine got ignored. Which I suspected would happen.
Say cut your spending and people freak out and say “No!!!l”.
Say cut your spending and people freak out and say “No!!!l”.
This post was edited on 11/22/25 at 1:48 pm
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:48 pm to upgrayedd
To answer the OP: No.
You know what sucks? The years right after college. They're filled with dead end jobs, shitty living situations, being perpetually broke, and struggling to get by in a world where you're viewed as expendable. You white knuckle your way through life, hoping no major unexpected event completely wrecks you financially for years. You drive shitty old cars, live in dumps, and generally have a life devoid of luxury or comfort.
That isn't magically getting worse. It has always been dogshit. We used to call it growing up. Unfortunately, we have raised another generation with such warped expectations, that the slightest bit of adversity, discomfort, or inconvenience is the growing injustice of the universe.
You know what sucks? The years right after college. They're filled with dead end jobs, shitty living situations, being perpetually broke, and struggling to get by in a world where you're viewed as expendable. You white knuckle your way through life, hoping no major unexpected event completely wrecks you financially for years. You drive shitty old cars, live in dumps, and generally have a life devoid of luxury or comfort.
That isn't magically getting worse. It has always been dogshit. We used to call it growing up. Unfortunately, we have raised another generation with such warped expectations, that the slightest bit of adversity, discomfort, or inconvenience is the growing injustice of the universe.
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:52 pm to UptownJoeBrown
Well I want to reverse the trend since the recession . wages are stagnant compared to rising expenses. these people will never own a home, in particular the low and middle class.
Young families are struggling with $1500 rent and $2000 day care. The high paying White Collar industries that pay us enough to buy a median home are shredding jobs and AI will accelerate to eliminate millions more.
Seniors have the political leverage to change laws to benefit them, they make up the median US voter. Politicians are of similar age and share common interest. Prop 13 in CA and other states pass laws for property tax relief while benefiting from your home's property valuation. When companies fire 100s of working-age Americans and outsource them to India or South America (how many cities in the US have collapsed economically because of that?) , those savings increase the companies' stock valuation and seniors' 401ks and pension funds.
Is it the sole blame of you guys? No, obv labor and construction costs are up and big metros arent building enough.
But some treat this like a temporary "storm will pass" thing, when its not. The generation with the political means does not want it to change, when they benefit from it. the response is "my kids and grandkids are doing great!" Is the older generation interested in working until 70, 75 to help prolong Social Security solvency?
some quotes and charts about the trend facing my generation
LINK
LINK
LINK
New residential construction building permits issued per 1,000 Americans by year
U.S. Residential Building Permits Adjusted for Population, 1980-2023
Young families are struggling with $1500 rent and $2000 day care. The high paying White Collar industries that pay us enough to buy a median home are shredding jobs and AI will accelerate to eliminate millions more.
Seniors have the political leverage to change laws to benefit them, they make up the median US voter. Politicians are of similar age and share common interest. Prop 13 in CA and other states pass laws for property tax relief while benefiting from your home's property valuation. When companies fire 100s of working-age Americans and outsource them to India or South America (how many cities in the US have collapsed economically because of that?) , those savings increase the companies' stock valuation and seniors' 401ks and pension funds.
Is it the sole blame of you guys? No, obv labor and construction costs are up and big metros arent building enough.
But some treat this like a temporary "storm will pass" thing, when its not. The generation with the political means does not want it to change, when they benefit from it. the response is "my kids and grandkids are doing great!" Is the older generation interested in working until 70, 75 to help prolong Social Security solvency?
some quotes and charts about the trend facing my generation
LINK
quote:
“It will eliminate jobs,” JPMorgan Chase CEO Dimon said, pointing out that so did tractors and cars, once upon a time. “It happens too fast,” he said, referring to sudden, disruptive technological change. He urged society, government, and business to “figure out how we can save jobs,” whether that’s through retraining, a new form of income, early retirement, he said there’s a need for “something—you can’t just take all these people and throw them on the street … making $30,000 a year when they were making [$150,000], you’ll have a revolution.”
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. LINK
quote:
- Baby boomers account for 42% of all home buyers, while millennials fall to 29% (down from 38% from one year ago).
- Multigenerational home buying is on the rise, with Generation X leading the trend.
- Half of older boomers and 40% of younger boomers are purchasing homes entirely with cash.
- the average age for a first-time homebuyer is now at its highest ever: 40.
WASHINGTON (April 1, 2025) – In a shift that underscores changing dynamics in the housing market, baby boomers now make up the largest generational group of home buyers, according to the National Association of Realtors®.
NAR's 2025 Home Buyers and Sellers Generational Trends report, which examines the similarities and differences among recent home buyers and sellers across generations1, found that the combined share of younger boomers (ages 60–69) and older boomers (ages 70–78) rose to 42% of all home buyers in the past year. Millennials dropped to 29% of all buyers – down notably from 38% a year ago. Generation X buyers (ages 45–59) held steady at 24%.
"In a plot twist, baby boomers have overtaken millennials – the largest U.S. population – to become the top generation of home buyers," said Jessica Lautz, NAR deputy chief economist and vice president of research. "What's striking is that half of older boomers and two out of five younger boomers are purchasing homes entirely with cash, bypassing financing altogether."
While older buyers were more likely to pay cash, younger generations were much more likely to rely on financing and family support. More than 90% of buyers 44 years and younger financed their home purchase. Twenty-seven percent of younger millennials (ages 26-34) and 13% of older millennials (ages 35-44) cited a gift from a relative or friend as one of the sources for their down payment.
LINK
quote:
High home prices and elevated mortgage rates have made it increasingly difficult for Gen Z and millennials to buy homes. The median age of first-time U.S. home buyers has significantly jumped during the past decade. Because incomes have not kept pace with housing costs, many younger Americans are locked out of homeownership.
It’s become increasingly difficult in recent years for young home buyers to break into the housing market. Between comparatively high mortgage rates and skyrocketing home prices, the weight of buying a home feels insurmountable for Gen Z and millennials.
And it shows in the data: In 2025, the share of first-time home buyers plummeted to a record low of 21%, while the typical age of first-time buyers climbed to an all-time high of 40 years, according to a National Association of Realtors report released Tuesday.
“The historically low share of first-time buyers underscores the real-world consequences of a housing market starved for affordable inventory,” Jessica Lautz, NAR deputy chief economist and vice president of research, said in a statement. “The share of first-time buyers in the market has contracted by 50% since 2007—right before the Great Recession.”
According to a previous NAR report, the share of “older” baby boomer (1946-1954) home buyers was 22%, while the share of “younger” millennials (1990-1998) and Gen Zers (1999-2011) were just 14% and 5%, respectively. And as Jim Reid, head of global macro research at Deutsche Bank pointed out in a note this summer, 46% of homes purchased in 2024 were by those aged 60 and over.
quote:
Younger buyers struggling to break into the housing market
Historically, younger buyers have made up a much larger piece of the pie. The median age of a first-time home buyer was 28 years old in 1991. That jumped to 38 years old in 2024, according to NAR. And “rising home prices and high mortgage rates have pushed” the median age of home buyers to a record-high of 56 years old in 2024, up from 46 in 2021,” wrote Apollo Academy Chief Economist Torsten Sløk, citing NAR data.
As of February, Americans need to make about $141,000 to afford a median-priced home, according to a National Association of Home Builders report, but the average salary for a person in the U.S. is about half of that.
The income needed to buy a home in the U.S. “remains significantly higher than before the [COVID-19] pandemic, underscoring the ongoing challenge of affordability even as market conditions gradually rebalance,” Realtor.com Chief Economist Danielle Hale said in a statement.
New residential construction building permits issued per 1,000 Americans by year
U.S. Residential Building Permits Adjusted for Population, 1980-2023
This post was edited on 11/22/25 at 1:54 pm
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:53 pm to UptownJoeBrown
quote:
Again, no solutions. frick give me some! I tried to start but mine got ignored. Which I suspected would happen. Say cut your spending and people freak out and say “No!!!l”.
I just said there’s always something you can do. Are you fricking retarded?
I’m speaking to the larger point of the problems in their generation. They’re getting fricked from the top down on 20 different levels. Acting like they can get out of it by not getting Starbucks and DoorDash (which they should) is mind-numbingly retarded.
Posted on 11/22/25 at 1:59 pm to BoardReader
quote:
That isn't magically getting worse. It has always been dogshit. We used to call it growing up. Unfortunately, we have raised another generation with such warped expectations, that the slightest bit of adversity, discomfort, or inconvenience is the growing injustice of the universe.
Some of this is absolutely true. A lot of them think that luxuries are some sort of human right. I know a lot of them that actually work hard, do the right thing, plan, and save yet their prospects look grim. They’re supposed to compete in a business environment where a lot of companies view them as expendable, their entry level jobs are at risk of being squeezed out so investors can make and extra 0.001% or get offshored to some Indian for pennies on the dollar. Hell, telling them to go into a trade to compete with some illegal who’ll do the same job for $5/hr is starting to sound suicidal too.
Posted on 11/22/25 at 2:04 pm to BoardReader
Another thing that boomers had that a lot of kids don’t have today is mentorship. No one wants to take the time, money or effort to pass on knowledge to a hose entering the workforce.
I’ve seen on several occasions these boomers who have built these businesses with a core group all of a sudden decide to sell the company to some large firm backed by PE that comes in and treats everyone like shite and fricks up the business rather than either handing it off to someone within the company or finding a like minded investor to take over.
I’ve seen on several occasions these boomers who have built these businesses with a core group all of a sudden decide to sell the company to some large firm backed by PE that comes in and treats everyone like shite and fricks up the business rather than either handing it off to someone within the company or finding a like minded investor to take over.
Posted on 11/22/25 at 2:06 pm to UptownJoeBrown
quote:
Is that what their solution is?
No, I’m a reactionary.
I’d say one possible solution is Demeny voting, giving children a vote by proxy. It’s unusual for society to have an inverted age pyramid and to be so gerontocratic. I think the needs of the young need more representation, or you end up with policies like prop 13 or single family zoning that are essentially wealth transfers from young to old.
Posted on 11/22/25 at 2:12 pm to Prawn
quote:
I’d say one possible solution is Demeny voting, giving children a vote by proxy. It’s unusual for society to have an inverted age pyramid and to be so gerontocratic. I think the needs of the young need more representation, or you end up with policies like prop 13 or single family zoning that are essentially wealth transfers from young to old.
Absolutely not. The problem is that politicians don’t give a shite what their constituents think or want. They do whatever benefits them the most because there’s nothing the avg citizen can do about it. They also know that if they don’t do what they’re told, someone will replace them and play ball.
Popular
Back to top


0





