- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BRPD release two videos in regards to Tigerland shooting
Posted on 7/21/20 at 8:48 am to crewdepoo
Posted on 7/21/20 at 8:48 am to crewdepoo
People need to understand that the videos don’t tell the whole story. They are a great tool but need to be reviewed with the understanding of what they are.
Many times the officer sees something before the video starts or something off camera that he reacts to and people watching the video then don’t understand his actions.
To try to catch everything on camera, body cams have a very wide angle fish eye lens. It changes the perception of distance. “Why the hell did he shoot that guy with a knife / pipe / brick when he was so far away?” When, in reality, the guy was six feet away and about to bash their head in.
The worst part though is that the video gets slowed down and examined frame by frame. An entire incident occurs in three seconds but two days later closely examining video frame 1,683 you can see that the suspects hand was opening as he began to drop the gun after firing the three shots at the officers. Why did they shoot him?
Many times the officer sees something before the video starts or something off camera that he reacts to and people watching the video then don’t understand his actions.
To try to catch everything on camera, body cams have a very wide angle fish eye lens. It changes the perception of distance. “Why the hell did he shoot that guy with a knife / pipe / brick when he was so far away?” When, in reality, the guy was six feet away and about to bash their head in.
The worst part though is that the video gets slowed down and examined frame by frame. An entire incident occurs in three seconds but two days later closely examining video frame 1,683 you can see that the suspects hand was opening as he began to drop the gun after firing the three shots at the officers. Why did they shoot him?
Posted on 7/21/20 at 8:52 am to crewdepoo
quote:
Black or white, you should have fair treatment from the police. These videos help provide that.
Nobody’s arguing that. What it does is introduce prejudice, and if it ever went to trail, it would make it very difficult to get a fair trial because of that fact.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 8:53 am to jbgleason
quote:
Why did they shoot him?
He deserved it.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 8:58 am to jbgleason
Obviously ppl are gonna watch those two videos and think they know the whole story. Like the ppl that are angry about and the ppl that say he deserved it. The videos don’t show either.
I’d much rather see some video than believe the polices investigation of themselves.
I’d much rather see some video than believe the polices investigation of themselves.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 8:59 am to ksayetiger
quote:quote:
Early speculation is that the officers shot the K9
so it is still the criminals fault. cops never would have shot their own dog normally
same as if a couple guys try to jump you in the street and you shoot and kill 1 of them... the other dude who tried to jump you will be charged in his buddy's death
Posted on 7/21/20 at 9:05 am to jbgleason
quote:
Many times the officer sees something before the video starts or something off camera that he reacts to and people watching the video then don’t understand his actions.
There is no perfect answer. But having the footage and releasing it is 1,000 better than simply letting the cops tell the whole story and investigate themselves. Too many cops have been proven to lie and falsify evidence. The vast majority of the cops are decent guys and having the videos allow them to show the situation from there perspective as well. The videos are there to protect the cops as much as anything in my opinion.
quote:
The worst part though is that the video gets slowed down and examined frame by frame. An entire incident occurs in three seconds but two days later closely examining video frame 1,683 you can see that the suspects hand was opening as he began to drop the gun after firing the three shots at the officers. Why did they shoot him?
This is true for everyone's profession. No one likes being put under a microscope.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 9:06 am to ksayetiger
quote:
so it is still the criminals fault. cops never would have shot their own dog normally

Posted on 7/21/20 at 9:57 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
What in the world happened to Tigerland? That was the place to be in the '70's and '80's
There's some change that takes place over 50 years
Posted on 7/21/20 at 9:59 am to jbgleason
Doesn’t matter. You shoot at a cop expect to get shot back at.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 10:02 am to Trump_Hands
Philanthropist, business owner, victim.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 10:04 am to tketaco
Sadly, his dream to create a foundation to help the disenfranchised will never be realized.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 10:07 am to dukke v
quote:
You shoot at a cop expect to get shot back at.
Didn’t say he shot. Said he aimed but same thing. He was probably aiming at the dog the cops sent at him.
This post was edited on 7/21/20 at 10:08 am
Posted on 7/21/20 at 10:50 am to Mr Clean
quote:
There's some change that takes place over 50 years
I've heard some rumors about developer alums buying up Tigerland to demolish and redevelop; it's been all talk and speculation so far.
I do know Middle Eastern landlords started to buy up a lot of the property in the 1980's. Perhaps they're the ones who allowed the area to go to seed.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 10:51 am to crewdepoo
quote:
He was probably aiming at the dog
My secret dream is for a Battle Royale' between BLM and PETA. Hopefully with a staggering body count.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 10:55 am to ksayetiger
quote:
criminal should burn in hell just for this part:
For the dog getting shot? The dog? A dog?
Posted on 7/21/20 at 10:57 am to Geauxboy
quote:
For the dog getting shot? The dog? A dog?
Yes. Burn in hell.
Posted on 7/21/20 at 11:03 am to p&g
quote:
Place needs a bulldozer
There are a lot of places that are like this in Baton Rouge. I wish that would be an option on the table sometimes. It may be the only way to save some areas from becoming high crime areas. (O'Neal south of South Harrell's Ferry with the townhomes comes to mind)
This post was edited on 7/21/20 at 11:05 am
Popular
Back to top

4










