Started By
Message

Bloomberg Sources: California Considers Paying Valero to Continue Operating Refinery

Posted on 9/9/25 at 12:26 pm
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27109 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 12:26 pm
quote:

--California lawmakers are weighing a deal with Valero Energy, under which the state would pay the oil refiner hundreds of millions of dollars to prevent the closure of a San Francisco-area fuel plant, Bloomberg reported, citing people familiar with the matter.

--Between $80 million and $200 million of state funds could be earmarked for refinery maintenance costs, allowing Valero to continue operating its Benicia refinery, which is currently slated to close by April, the people said, according to the report.

--Legislators discussed the deal as recently as this past weekend and have until late Tuesday to submit bills for consideration, absent a deadline extension, according to Bloomberg.

--Valero didn't respond to requests for comment, and neither California Governor Gavin Newsom's office nor representatives for state senate and assembly leaders responded to inquiries left outside of normal business hours, Bloomberg reported.


LINK



So the politicians, including the Governor, pass a bunch of laws to hamstring refineries. They run to the media demonizing the oil & gas industry accusing them of price gouging California, despite all the taxes attached to gasoline sales in CA.

Now after refineries start closing and companies leaving California, the politicians are talking about forking over tens to hundreds of millions of dollars to refiners stop the bleeding.

What a bunch of maroons.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103076 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 12:28 pm to
10 seconds after Valero agrees, they will find a way to cancel these payments.
Posted by Helo
Orlando
Member since Nov 2004
4748 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 12:32 pm to
Predictable.

I guess a win win.
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
135016 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 12:37 pm to
Well, that will start a trend that will cost taxpayers more and more money than we already pay.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27109 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 12:40 pm to
It could.

Seems idiotic policy that was avoidable simply by not being typical economic illiterate CA politicians.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
17179 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Well, that will start a trend that will cost taxpayers more and more money than we already pay.


If we could just find a way to get the uninsured off the roads that would be nice.

Would I rather pay a bit more in fuel if it meant others couldn’t drive which means they didn’t have insurance to begin with.

That is the question I’m asking myself lol.
This post was edited on 9/9/25 at 12:54 pm
Posted by Sidicous
NELA
Member since Aug 2015
19296 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 12:53 pm to
Valero should tell the legislature that payback is a bitch, buh bye.



Then wait for the offer to at least triple.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
17179 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

Valero should tell the legislature that payback is a bitch, buh bye.


100

Tell them to eat your arse on the way out

Well maybe don’t, Gavin might take you up on that offer.
This post was edited on 9/9/25 at 12:55 pm
Posted by WhiskeyThrottle
Weatherford Tx
Member since Nov 2017
6875 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 12:56 pm to
Step 1: Create problem
Step 2: "Create a solution"
Step 3: ????
Step 4: Profit
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
24717 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

the politicians are talking about forking over tens to hundreds of millions of dollars to refiners stop the bleeding.


Aren't they already in debt billions of dollars? Taxes in Cali are going to have to go up again. How can people not see that their taxes primarily pay for their state government's bad decision making?
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
33599 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

How can people not see that their taxes primarily pay for their state government's bad decision making?


They think that the funds will be made up once the “rich pay their fair share.”
Posted by Crappieman
Member since Apr 2025
1578 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 2:50 pm to
Valero better take monies upfront. Newsome won't be governor much longer and the next liberal one won't honor any promises.
Posted by honeybadger07
The Woodlands
Member since Jul 2015
3667 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 3:19 pm to
Hell no, Valero should tell them to eat shite and make these fools suffer due to their own poor decisions.
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
24455 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 3:21 pm to
quote:


10 seconds after Valero agrees, they will find a way to cancel these payments.


Tell California, payment up front bitch.
Posted by SantaFe
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2019
7564 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 3:26 pm to
If I were Valero I would ignore that state govt. and disassemble that refinery and ship the parts to Texas.

Then sell the land and not pay the taxes on the sale.
Posted by papasmurf1269
Hells Pass
Member since Apr 2005
21336 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

after Valero agrees


They should tell California state government to go frick themselves. They made their bed and now they can sleep in it
Posted by TygerLyfe
Member since May 2023
2616 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 4:03 pm to
Wearelaughing.gif
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49030 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

How can people not see that their taxes primarily pay for their state government's bad decision making?


To be fair, this is case in basically every government in existence
Posted by RicoSuave2025
Member since Jan 2025
242 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 4:05 pm to
Can anyone please explain to me how these politicians get elected in California? The politicians do everything possible to force these companies to leave the state, only to turn around and throw millions of tax dollars at them to stay. Is the purpose to just create a problem to give them a reason to move tax dollars around? We all know there is plenty being skimmed off the top on that money. Probably going right into Newsom’s pocket.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12533 posts
Posted on 9/9/25 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

Valero should tell the legislature that payback is a bitch, buh bye.

Then wait for the offer to at least triple.

If there’s a major refining company that would do this, it’s Valero. They’ve done some petty (or awesome, depending how you look at it) shite before. Including blacklisting industry-leading manufacturers over “carbon neutral” pledges.

Valero doesn’t give two shits about appeasing folks who are ideologically opposed to their existence as a company.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram