- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Baton Rouge - After accident, man jumps from I-10 to avoid being hit by car
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:41 am to member12
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:41 am to member12
quote:
they put a much bigger wall to catch the cars that would otherwise fall over.
The ramp was also widened to add more outside shoulder room.
"Re-banking" would be a geometric nightmare that would require modifications to the superelevations and grade tie-ins far beyond the ramp location.
See, those are the kind of issues that people who aren't involved with sort of work don't understand when they say things like "just build a loop" or "widen the ramp". It is the same as if I would walk into a Dr's office who just discovered a tumor on my brother's brain and told him, just cut it off.
Just like your complaints about the alleged reallocation of the money from use in the BR area to the widening of I-10 on the other side of the basin. That money was from a grant which had stipulations that construction using that money had to begin within a certain time frame. The area where the widening is taking place did not require additional right of way acquisitions which meant that with plans ready, the project could begin. Widening of I-10 in BR will require obtaining significant right of way and I assume a lot of it will be difficult to acquire due to resistance. That means a longer time frame to do so. The BR I-10 widening just did not meet the constraints that were imposed on the grant money.
Posted on 12/12/17 at 9:45 am to member12
quote:
member12
You’re probably on a watch list now
Posted on 12/12/17 at 9:57 am to lostinbr
if they had built another bridge from BR to west baton rouge/iberville parish, instead of a bridge between st. francisville and new roads that serves about 10 people a day a lot of problems would have ceased
Posted on 12/12/17 at 10:42 am to member12
quote:
That section hasn't been updated since it was built in 1962.
US Population 1962 = 186 million
Louisiana Population 1962 = 3.3 million
Greater Baton Rouge Population 1962 = 300k
US Population 2017 = 308 million
Louisiana Population. 2017 = 4.7 million
Greater Baton Rouge Population 2017 = 825k
Behind the 8 ball in infrastructure is a bit understated, wouldn’t you say?
That single lane coming off the bridge and Washington street and Southdowns handicapping everyone traversing I-10 eastbound is absolutely ludicrous, and beyond embarrassing. There simply is NO excuse for this at this point save Louisiana at its finest.
Hey, I’m truly sorry you live next to an interstate, but you simply cannot stop the rest of the country because you want an exit where it is dangerous to have one and where it doesn’t belong, or don’t want an interstate lane expansion because you don’t like change. The only real constant in life IS change, and you not adapting to it and changing with it is causing a roadblock in life for everyone else, namely everyone.
Posted on 12/12/17 at 11:35 am to Mike da Tigah
There are two lanes coming off the bridge.
Those homes were there before the interstate was.
All the overpass businesses will have to be closed down to expand a lane of the bridge. All those homes will have to be purchased. Bodi White wanted to give away all our Parish GLP money to pay for a bridge that most people who live in the parish do not use often. WBR can pay for it if it bothers them so much.
Those homes were there before the interstate was.
All the overpass businesses will have to be closed down to expand a lane of the bridge. All those homes will have to be purchased. Bodi White wanted to give away all our Parish GLP money to pay for a bridge that most people who live in the parish do not use often. WBR can pay for it if it bothers them so much.
This post was edited on 12/12/17 at 11:39 am
Posted on 12/12/17 at 11:44 am to Quinn225
quote:
There are two lanes coming off the bridge.
That end abruptly shortly thereafter as you come upon Washington Street exit, which causes two lanes to try and merge into one lane on the damn interstate, and causes an absolute clusterfrick and proves dangerous as hell all day every day.
Let’s just be honest, OK. It’s really just a fancy single lane due to both lanes having to merge within feet of being pushed off the interstate onto that dumb arse exit to nowhere. This is why the left turning lane off of the bridge is much much longer than the other to the right because everyone knows they’re going to encounter a fricking mess.
This is all day every day, and it’s inexcusable.
quote:
Those homes were there before the interstate was.
As were the buildings that were cleared to make way for the interstate in the first place.
quote:
WBR can pay for it if it bothers them so much.
WBR has dick to do with this. This is about interstate traffic, not WBR residents.
This post was edited on 12/12/17 at 11:50 am
Posted on 12/12/17 at 12:42 pm to Quinn225
quote:
All the overpass businesses will have to be closed down to expand a lane of the bridge.
False
They are going to shut down the Perkins onramp. They won't need more space there to add another lane for that reason. The planned layout was posted on tigerdroppings months ago.
This post was edited on 12/12/17 at 12:46 pm
Posted on 12/12/17 at 2:38 pm to blacykaty
quote:It's not that bad, you just have to #staywoke and not blink.
Drive though San Antonio - it is a cluster if you try to stay on I-10 - either direction. 1 lane, and if you blink, you will miss it.
Popular
Back to top

0





