- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Author Sophie Lewis' forthcoming book is titled 'Abolish the Family'
Posted on 9/27/22 at 10:28 am to LSUBFA83
Posted on 9/27/22 at 10:28 am to LSUBFA83
quote:
All these "it takes a village" retards don't realize that the village is an extension of the nuclear family, not a replacement.
It takes a village, but unfortunately, we ran into the idiot cited in OP.
0
Posted on 9/27/22 at 10:30 am to deathvalleyfreak43
Before I take advice from anyone, I need to their resume'.
What is it about this fat, unattractive Ginger that says I should take ANY advice from her?
What has she built?
What has she created?
What has she done that so benefits mankind that we should undo thousands of years of accepted wisdom and adopt her radical ideas?
Bet this stupid bitch couldn't change a flat tire to save her life.
What is it about this fat, unattractive Ginger that says I should take ANY advice from her?
What has she built?
What has she created?
What has she done that so benefits mankind that we should undo thousands of years of accepted wisdom and adopt her radical ideas?
Bet this stupid bitch couldn't change a flat tire to save her life.
Posted on 9/27/22 at 10:34 am to dandyjohn
quote:
Abolish caring about what other people do if it doesn't affect you.
You are posting this to the author of this dumpster fire of a book right?
By your logic the book should never be written or published. Let's go to the source to solve the problem.
Posted on 9/27/22 at 10:37 am to tgrgrd00
quote:
Abolish caring about what other people do if it doesn't affect you.
This line of thinking is why our society is collapsing. We need to go back to the age of people knowing there are standards of behavior that’s required to be a member of society.
Posted on 9/27/22 at 10:38 am to deathvalleyfreak43
If you ever want the literal caricature/ideal of useful idiots promoting crypto-Marxism, look no further than this subject.
There are 2 main components to this argument:
1. A desire to have state encroach over children in order to promote brainwashing supporting authoritarianism.
2. Differing outcomes based on family status.
The goal is 1 and they use 2 as their justification.
They have to use the most warped "reasoning" to attack 2, and that's the giveaway as to their actual intentions. If you have 2 population groupings and the distinction is based in a traditional/historic status, a rational actor would say, "how do we promote this status with the non-adopting population?" A dishonest actor sees this status as a path away from collectivism, so they warp this status into a "privilege", which we must fight against to stop the inequity.
This concept is created by intelligentsia and then spread by these dullards. They desire the response as a troll because they only care about themselves (ironically) and negative attention not only spreads their importance and perceived intelligence, but it also reinforces how toxic "normal" people and values are (by their response to the trolling). I'm sure this same useful idiot would be the first to tell you all of her degrees as an argument from authority to shut down any actual discussion about her "thesis".
There are 2 main components to this argument:
1. A desire to have state encroach over children in order to promote brainwashing supporting authoritarianism.
2. Differing outcomes based on family status.
The goal is 1 and they use 2 as their justification.
They have to use the most warped "reasoning" to attack 2, and that's the giveaway as to their actual intentions. If you have 2 population groupings and the distinction is based in a traditional/historic status, a rational actor would say, "how do we promote this status with the non-adopting population?" A dishonest actor sees this status as a path away from collectivism, so they warp this status into a "privilege", which we must fight against to stop the inequity.
This concept is created by intelligentsia and then spread by these dullards. They desire the response as a troll because they only care about themselves (ironically) and negative attention not only spreads their importance and perceived intelligence, but it also reinforces how toxic "normal" people and values are (by their response to the trolling). I'm sure this same useful idiot would be the first to tell you all of her degrees as an argument from authority to shut down any actual discussion about her "thesis".
Posted on 9/27/22 at 10:52 am to SlowFlowPro
Is the book dedicated to LBJ?
Posted on 9/27/22 at 11:03 am to deathvalleyfreak43
a very progressive book - she doesn't believe in family, so no one can have one
probably doesn't believe in eating meat, so no one should be able to eat meat
probably doesn't believe in eating meat, so no one should be able to eat meat
Posted on 9/27/22 at 11:31 am to Ten Bears
quote:
Only then can we begin to break down our assumptions that children 'belong' to those whose genetics they share. Taking collective responsibility for children would radically transform our notions of kinship, helping us to see that it always takes a village to make a baby."
Oh, I get it. You absolutely hate what I stand for and will pass down to MY children, so you can any to circumvent this and claim them as public property.
Posted on 9/27/22 at 11:35 am to chinhoyang
quote:
a very progressive book - she doesn't believe in family, so no one can have one
probably doesn't believe in eating meat, so no one should be able to eat meat
Exactly correct. If a left winger doesn't like something they think everyone should be banned from having it and if they do like something they think everyone should be forced to have it.
Pretty disgusting people really
Posted on 9/27/22 at 11:38 am to deathvalleyfreak43
IN 5 years she'll be whining about being unmarried and childless...BET!
Posted on 9/27/22 at 11:40 am to deathvalleyfreak43
It's really getting old, to look back on what people warned us about Women's Rights, Gay Rights, Black People's Rights, Sexual Revolution...that were derided as crazy bigots and zealots. They were 100% right. On all counts.
Posted on 9/27/22 at 11:53 am to deathvalleyfreak43
quote:Amazing. We have thousands of years of evolving experience showing strong family optimizes survivabilty and success... and the Wokehead's come along and "nah, let's ignore all that".
'Abolish the Family
Posted on 9/27/22 at 12:46 pm to deathvalleyfreak43
This just screams projection of her shitty life on people who simple aren’t like her. I can’t fathom the level of narcissism it takes to write something this.
Posted on 9/27/22 at 1:23 pm to deathvalleyfreak43
No one would want to frick her anyway.
Posted on 9/27/22 at 1:40 pm to Tempratt
IT will be taught at a college near you soon
Posted on 9/27/22 at 1:42 pm to Lithium
Abolish this dick
Posted on 9/27/22 at 1:45 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
Amazing. We have thousands of years of evolving experience showing strong family optimizes survivabilty and success... and the Wokehead's come along and "nah, let's ignore all that"
The problem is the assumption that Marxist care at all about the success of the human race.
Posted on 9/27/22 at 1:47 pm to deathvalleyfreak43
Sounds like she had a shitty family and wants everyone to wallow in misery with her.
Posted on 9/27/22 at 1:49 pm to deathvalleyfreak43
This can be summed up as:
that's all this is.
quote:
how MY family WAS a terrible way to satisfy MY desires for love, care, nourishment.
that's all this is.
Posted on 9/27/22 at 1:53 pm to oogabooga68
Pretty much the same questions I ask when I hear a bunch of horse crap being pushed as a necessary change in society.
It is easy to advocate for change but it is very difficult to make a change that makes the situation better. You can easily create a change or changes that destabilize a society.
Unfortunately we live in a world of over educated and bitter people who think the changes they advocate would create a perfect world and just world.
It is easy to advocate for change but it is very difficult to make a change that makes the situation better. You can easily create a change or changes that destabilize a society.
Unfortunately we live in a world of over educated and bitter people who think the changes they advocate would create a perfect world and just world.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News