- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Apple acts all high and mighty.. Won't turn over password to terrorists iPhone
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:13 am to Haughton99
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:13 am to Haughton99
But the FBI uses a battering ram to break down the front door and lead Jared off in handcuffs along with his non-ios-hard drive.
Sucks to not plan your crime hardware
Sucks to not plan your crime hardware
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:13 am to CAD703X
God damn you are fricking dense
This post was edited on 2/17/16 at 8:14 am
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:14 am to jeff5891
quote:
Like how the court can order you to open up a safe? I would argue the precedent has already been set.
If the person who knows the combination is dead, the court doesn't order the mfg of the safe to open it with a special device that the mfg has created to bypass the combination.
They simply drill right through it with technology created by someone else.
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:14 am to MrSmith
quote:
Decades of security and encryption engineering was done for a reason.
oh I get that, but I'd like to think we have someone in our defense dept/NSA who can get past something like this.
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:15 am to CAD703X
quote:Again, they are free to use a battering ram in this case.
But the FBI uses a battering ram to break down the front door and lead Jared off in handcuffs along with his non-ios-hard drive.
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:16 am to tigerinthebueche
That's the beauty of encryption
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:16 am to tigerinthebueche
We obviously don't or this wouldn't be an issue
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:16 am to CAD703X
quote:
Apple acts all high and mighty.. Won't turn over password to terrorists iPhone
From what I understand the government wants Apple to show them how to get into all Apple phones not just this one terrorist's phone.
I'm with Apple on this one if that's the case.
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:17 am to CAD703X
quote:
So FBI can use Cofee (Google it) to break into hard drives of suspected pedophiles to find evidence butiPhones which are also nothing but a fancy hard drive are exempt?
Eta the terrorists have won... Literally
One has nothing to do with the other.
Part of the phones OS is the time limit on passcode lock attempts and the forced wipe of the phone after too many attempts. If those provisions were removed anybody's phone could be unlocked if you were willing to enter 9,999 different codes. Just a matter of time. The phone won't let you do that.
The hard drives you talk about don't have an OS that does this built in.
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:19 am to CAD703X
So let me get this straight, all of a sudden you anti tyrannical government types want the government to be able to read all of our information just because.
Goddam you people need to stick with what you know which is... well I'm still trying to figure that out.
Goddam you people need to stick with what you know which is... well I'm still trying to figure that out.
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:20 am to CAD703X
You're ignorance and/or stupidity of encryption, particularly the way Apple implemented in these phones, is astounding. You have no clue what you are talking about yet you maintain your opinion is the correct one.
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:21 am to SabiDojo
quote:
Didn't the detectives who were investigating La'Ell Collins's girlfriend's death say that Apple said they couldn't even access her phone? What crazy tech.
The crazy thing is the vast number of people in this thread that have zero concept of how search and seizure works.
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:22 am to CAD703X
Seriously, you're in the IT security field?
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:23 am to TigerBait1127
Hopefully far away from software and security.
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:24 am to Golfer
Ah shite that's probably the case I'm thinking of.
Either way, the supreme Court needs to make a ruling on this so that there is more clarity on the issue.
IMO if apple has the means as of now to provide access, they should.
If they don't, they shouldn't be made to create a version that does
Either way, the supreme Court needs to make a ruling on this so that there is more clarity on the issue.
IMO if apple has the means as of now to provide access, they should.
If they don't, they shouldn't be made to create a version that does
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:25 am to CAD703X
What Apple is doing should not concern you as much as being 3 months into an investigation and the FBI not already having a search warrant for these frickers phones.
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:25 am to logjamming
So let me get this straight:
Apple is publicly announcing today that terrorists and other criminals can step up their game if they go ios instead of Windows?
Eta this should help boost their iPhone sales figures in the middle East
Apple is publicly announcing today that terrorists and other criminals can step up their game if they go ios instead of Windows?
Eta this should help boost their iPhone sales figures in the middle East
This post was edited on 2/17/16 at 8:29 am
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:29 am to CAD703X
You aren't aware of existing 3rd party software and apps that do the same thing Apple now uses? The ones criminals more knowledgeable than you have been using for years?
Posted on 2/17/16 at 8:31 am to recruitnik
Agree. Apple should stick to their guns on this.
On a side note, I'm certain the gubmint can crack that phone but then they would have to admit to being able to crack iphones and risk another Edward Snowden like shite storm.
They want apple to take the heat over violating customers privacy rights
On a side note, I'm certain the gubmint can crack that phone but then they would have to admit to being able to crack iphones and risk another Edward Snowden like shite storm.
They want apple to take the heat over violating customers privacy rights
Popular
Back to top



3





