re: Allegedly, Madison Brooks had sex the day before incident that caused that caused injuries

dna

quote:

---

She didn’t “run across a parking lot”
This is also real low iq argument and ignoring all other known details of her drunkenness known by the rapers before that event and even after that event.

---

Whatever level of consent she gave or didn't give will be used in future rape cases.

So if a girl can walk across a parking lot and get in a car and there's not evidence of her denying consent, that's the standard others will use in cases going forward.

This thread is clear that the the dudes will not get any serious punishment. It wouldn't matter if the girl had sex with half of baton rouge, if she said no in that moment or was too inebriated to give consent then it's rape.

All these people saying they feel bad for the girls family bc people are saying she's fast or dirty.

Seriously, who cares?

young (legal) women are sexually active. Why would a family even care about it if that's what she wanted to do? Her sex life isn't something that matters one bit.

This is like some horrible insight into the weird Victorian mindset of men who think women should not sleep around.

quote:

---

Just so we’re clear, you are referring to the car ride where she nearly immediately fell over to the side and was unable to answer to the driver her address? The same car ride that was offered to her because of her known drunkenness to which she repeatedly fell over and was helped picked up off the ground by the outside bench? I just want to make sure we are on the same page when talking about which car ride.

---

we are all aware of all of that.
You are trying to definitively say b/c of that, nothing else matters and she was 100% too drunk to consent.

and guess what, most people would probably agree, but just b/c we agree on that in here, doesn't mean that's what will hold up in court. That's the part you can't seem to understand or differentiate from.

quote:

---

There's video of her calling one of them a Texas A&M grad for not wanting to continue running the train on her.

---

quote:

---

With the assistance of three dudes

---

Imagine everything is the same but it's you and your buddies. Maybe someone gets lucky that night.

The girl said she was raped. Would her being able to walk with assistance be important?

quote:

---

So what are they arguing?

---

3rd degree rape (via the intoxication)

1st degree rape (since more than 1 participated, although I'm not sure that's the correct use of the statute).

and that old lady's boy crush casen has a video voyeurism charge

quote:

---

left off the side of a street unattended which directly led to her death.

---

Why the frick do you keep bring this up?

Thats not what this case is about

quote:

---

Whatever level of consent she gave or didn't give will be used in future rape cases.

---

and that's why i've said you can't just claim rape 100% of the time just b/c the woman is drunk. That's not me saying no woman is ever raped. That's me simply saying drunk women have consensual sex all the time.
There's no denying she was really drunk, but that doesn't mean she didn't want to have sex with them (and i'm not saying she did or didn't here), and we can't ask her anythign about that night anymore unfortunately.

If we are trying to pinpoint a certain BAC to say that's the point you can no longer consent, i don't think that's something that works, b/c like i said, drunk women have consensual sex all the time. There's nothing concrete that says how drunk is too drunk to consent. The answer is pretty much if she's passed out and is non verbal, she's too drunk.

quote:

---

I'm not saying anything. I told you what the prosecution was arguing.

---

You've said a lot of stupid shite itt....

Tell us about your rape case where you alleged that you got raped...whats thats story and how did it turn out?

quote:

---

allegations

---

Are you so stupid you dont know the definition of allegation?