Started By
Message

re: A light topic for the day...Do you believe in evolution?

Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:25 am to
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:25 am to
quote:

I can't make it any more plain than: H20 is water.


Water - as we know it - is H2O.

Future theory and/or advances may say otherwise.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83630 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:26 am to
Evolution is an undeniable fact.

You need to start a thread about abiogenesis.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101930 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:27 am to
quote:

Knowing the complete answer wouldn't change a damn thing to me. God, aliens, blind luck, terrible curse...


No, it wouldn't change a damn thing, but we know the answer is evolution.
Posted by Hogwarts
Arkansas, USA
Member since Sep 2015
18064 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:27 am to
Adaptation? yes!

Do I believe I came from a starfish or a monkey? Nope.

Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:27 am to
quote:

You need to start a thread about abiogenesis.


No need to further complicate the issue, Dr. Salmon.
Posted by colorchangintiger
Dan Carlin
Member since Nov 2005
30979 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:27 am to
quote:

I'm not sure anything in science is ever 'proven' but there is certainly a lot of evidence for it.


Life. Just a theory.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85143 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:27 am to
quote:

Water - as we know it - is H2O.

Future theory and/or advances may say otherwise.
No. It won't.
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:28 am to
quote:

ell_13


Why are you angry?
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57437 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:28 am to
quote:

I can't make it any more plain than: H20 is water. Or the acceleration due to earth's gravity in a vacuum at 0 atm is -9.8 m/s.

Those are facts.


"Facts" based on what? A point in time, current knowledge about laws, nature? Context?

These are observations from which we use to deduce other deductions.

THEORETICALLY (and I know I'm wasting my time because you won't get this) those "facts" might be dependent of parameters inserted into the configuration of our current virtual simulation. How do you know what observations are 100% fact?

Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
24850 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:29 am to
quote:

I'm not sure anything in science is ever 'proven'


Maybe he's thinking about multi dimensions or something.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131476 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:29 am to
Micro or macro evolution?

And whoever said evolution is proven:, Why are you posting on a college message board, when it is obvious you never attended?
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85143 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:32 am to
quote:

"Facts" based on what?
Not facts in quotes. Facts.
quote:

These are observations from which we use to deduce other deductions.
So when you observe your phone or your computer screen are you saying that it's not a phone or computer? And yes. We use facts to help us make educated deductions for situations we can't observe.
quote:

THEORETICALLY (and I know I'm wasting my time because you won't get this) those "facts" might be dependent of parameters inserted into the configuration of our current virtual simulation.
Again with philosophy. If you're playing in a world you don't deem real, then why even have this conversation?
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57437 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:35 am to
quote:

If you want to discuss psychology and philosophy, fine. It was Nietzsche who made the claim that there are not eternal truths.


I'm discussing the ACTUAL SCIENTIFIC METHOD you retard

It's one big affirmation of the consequent - ie deductive approach to observations
This post was edited on 8/22/17 at 9:37 am
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85143 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Why are you angry?
Is this what pussies do when they can't make a real argument?

Saying "nothing is fact" or "nothing is real" is a philosophical argument, not a scientific one and is based on the stance that we can never perceive reality. If that's the case, then any discussion on God or a specific scientific theory/law/fact/opinion is pointless.
Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
72616 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:39 am to
At ONE TIME, the GREATEST thinkers and scientists in the world were convinced that the Sun revolved around the Earth. It was factual to them and not open to discussion. Subsequent evidence proved them one hundred percent wrong. The facts changed. They evolved. That's what we're trying to say it is tough to accept something as 100% factual,EVER.

However, your stubbornness and unwillingness to see the simple fact is starting to make your ignorance easy to accept 100%.
Posted by BlackAdam
Member since Jan 2016
6462 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:39 am to
I do not believe in evolution. Belief belongs in the providence of faith.

I accept evolution as a reality due to the overwhelming evidence that supports the theory.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57437 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:43 am to
quote:

I accept evolution as a reality due to the overwhelming evidence that supports the theory.


So you accept the belief that evolution is a reality. You believe something regardless.

Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61581 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:46 am to
I don't know why you think this is a light topic. It's one of the more contentious arguments out there because 99% of the people discussing it are not genuinely interested in actually discussing speciation. They use the evolution debate as a proxy argument about the existence or non-existence of God. It really is a shame because it's an interesting topic.

Evolution is real and undeniable. The DNA record and how different species are related to each other pretty much proves it. How it happens is still uncertain. Does it happen slow, or fast or both? Is it as simple as gene shift/drift and/or do viruses play a role? We're still looking for the answers but we have enough evidence to suggest it's a natural process rather than some supernatural process where God poofs new species into being from time to time to keep busy.
This post was edited on 8/22/17 at 9:47 am
Posted by TheDeathValley
New Orleans, LA
Member since Sep 2010
17201 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:46 am to
quote:

I believe God used evolution to form/shape the world He created.



I agree with this.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85143 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 9:48 am to
quote:

I'm discussing the ACTUAL SCIENTIFIC METHOD you retard
By saying there are no eternal truths?
quote:

It's one big affirmation of the consequent - ie deductive approach to observations
The scientific method isn't limited to just one approach and certainly not a deductive one at that.

We aren't talking about Schrodinger's cat where the observation itself can affect the outcome. Not all science is on the quantum level. An atom with one p/n/e is hydrogen. 2 of those bonded with an atom we call oxygen is the H20 molecule. These are facts. Observed in the same way that I know I exist and you exist (although the electron is the outlier there).

Now, if you want to get into a discussion about the existence of reality and conciousness, then again, that's philosophical not physics or chemistry or biology.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram