- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:09 pm to slackster
quote:
B) That is outdated information for Fluvalal. You also should familiarize yourself with efficacy vs. effectiveness with respect to vaccines.
Outdated as in never existed? So how many more sitting on the shelf right now that need to be outdated?
Nobody knows it's a problem until it's a problem right? Right.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:10 pm to nola000
The cost for my flu shot is zero US Dollars.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:11 pm to nola000
quote:
I really think this is less about the facts and more about certain personality types. There seems to be a large contingent of the human population that is willing and able to accept Dogma from many institutions they feel are respectable and above reproach. Then there the rest of us. Questioners. People with a curious enough mind to study history and read between the lines and dig into subjects a little deeper then what so-and-so told us.
What has all of your questioning determined? I'm looking for specifics. Which common vaccinations do you believe have a greater health risk than reward, on average?
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:12 pm to nola000
You sound more like a flat earther with each post.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:13 pm to drake20
I cant understand why being a skeptic and asking questions is a problem in yall's mind. What are you so convinced of? More importantly, what makes you think the information you get is valid? Is it because of the reputation of the institutions that are providing the information to you? Has it ever occurred to you to question that reputation? Have you? Because I have. And when you do your findings will shock you and change the way you view the world. Quit being so naive entrusting and protect yourself.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:13 pm to nola000
Autism is developed in utero, one or both of the parents supplied some damaged genes, just like every other developmental disorder.
It's ok to admit that.
It's ok to admit that.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:20 pm to slackster
quote:
What has all of your questioning determined?
I'm glad you asked.
That you can only trust yourself.
Unfortunately, very few of us have the time to dig into the background of every person we encounter, every institution that feeds us information, the news media, their stories, what we see on TV, what we read in books, what we hear on the radio and even what our own friends and family tell us.
The only thing any of us know for sure is what happens right in front of us for us to see, hear and experience first-hand. As far as I'm concerned everything else is suspect. Things that meet the common sense threshold get a little more credibility in my book but yet still unproven.
Y'all are still approaching me as if I'm making some certain claims. I'm only questioning that which I don't know, nay, can't know. This is a prudent way to approach everything in life and it's worked out pretty damn well for me so far. If your blind Trust has been so reliable for you and your life, then good for you. Keep On Keepin On.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:23 pm to ZappBrannigan
quote:
Autism is developed in utero, one or both of the parents supplied some damaged genes, just like every other developmental disorder.
It's ok to admit that
And you know this for sure? Were you part of some untainted research team that was truly independent and self-funded?
Please don't quote me some article from some Institution such as the CDC which document after document has shown to be an unreliable and Industry biased source. Not always of course. But certainly from time to time and I don't know about you but once somebody violates my trust it's very hard to earn it back.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:29 pm to nola000
quote:
Outdated as in never existed? So how many more sitting on the shelf right now that need to be outdated? Nobody knows it's a problem until it's a problem right? Right.
Outdated as in they know that if it produces autoimmune responses to a certain level, it will be effective against the flu.
If you care to educate yourself on the 2017-2018 version, here is the fact sheet.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:31 pm to nola000
Studies released by the CDC and the independent peer reviewed journals have all come back that it's not vaccines. The neurotissue damage associated with Autism isnt from the vaccines. They have no mechanism to affect it.
Look I did the step dad thing for awhile with a kid with autism. The signs were before the mom the whole time. She admits it. I did the naw boys will be boys thing, but even I knew I was just making excuses for his behavior. But it is what it is. Some people come out with bones wrong some people come out with brains wrong. Sometimes both. Eventually we'll find the common cluster like we've been for other development disorders.
Look I did the step dad thing for awhile with a kid with autism. The signs were before the mom the whole time. She admits it. I did the naw boys will be boys thing, but even I knew I was just making excuses for his behavior. But it is what it is. Some people come out with bones wrong some people come out with brains wrong. Sometimes both. Eventually we'll find the common cluster like we've been for other development disorders.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:34 pm to nola000
quote:
Y'all are still approaching me as if I'm making some certain claims. I'm only questioning that which I don't know, nay, can't know. This is a prudent way to approach everything in life and it's worked out pretty damn well for me so far. If your blind Trust has been so reliable for you and your life, then good for you. Keep On Keepin On.
Why is it "blind trust" when we use studies from the CDC, but acting on your gut instinct gives you some sort of enlightened high ground?
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:36 pm to slackster
I think you missed my point.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:36 pm to ZappBrannigan
quote:
People also say they're out sick with flu during flu season when it was just a cold.
There was something going around in winter 2012/2013 that was an absolute beast. It wasn't the flu, but it had some flu-like symptoms.
That was the last time I had to take off work for several days in a row for sickness. Don't think I have had the flu in a long time.
ETA: I get the flu shot every year.
This post was edited on 11/22/17 at 12:38 pm
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:38 pm to Rebel
quote:
The cost for my flu shot is zero US Dollars.
My employer actually has a couple of nurses come on site and give everyone flu shots.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:38 pm to goofball
Yeah, influenza vs flu-like symptoms is difficult to separate without medical attention.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:42 pm to nola000
quote:
I think you missed my point.
I think you misunderstood the disclaimer.
Basically, science has proven that if a vaccine can get X to happen, it is effective at preventing Y virus. Fluvlaval, at the time of your image, had been shown to achieve X, so logically, you can assume it would prevent Y. However, a controlled trial that demonstrated it would prevent Y had not been completed, hence the disclaimer.
That's since changed.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:43 pm to Rebel
quote:
Well now I have to do a 180. I grew up pre-Chicken pox vaccine days, and never had the chicken pox.
Every kid down my street had chicken pox at the same time. I was about 7 or 8.
This post was edited on 11/22/17 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:48 pm to nola000
I’m very close to developing an autism vaccine.
Only side effect is it gives you the flu.
Only side effect is it gives you the flu.
Posted on 11/22/17 at 12:50 pm to notsince98
People are still forgetting what relative risk means.
A 50% decrease in relative risk in this instance means that any individuals risk of getting the flu decreases from 2‰ to 1%.
Therefore, around 99 people need to get the flu shot to prevent just one person from getting the flu.
Don't you think that's a bit inefficient and a waste of healthcare money that could go to something more productive.
And to Dr. Scruffy who says he's had the shot for 8 years and hasn't gotten the flu...what kind of silly reasoning is this for a medical professional? The chance of not getting the flu is 98% regardless, so how could you determine its the vaccine that helped?
The strains for the vaccine are selected so far in advance that even if influenza virus didn't mutate at a high level, it'd still be highly unlikely to succeed.
A 50% decrease in relative risk in this instance means that any individuals risk of getting the flu decreases from 2‰ to 1%.
Therefore, around 99 people need to get the flu shot to prevent just one person from getting the flu.
Don't you think that's a bit inefficient and a waste of healthcare money that could go to something more productive.
And to Dr. Scruffy who says he's had the shot for 8 years and hasn't gotten the flu...what kind of silly reasoning is this for a medical professional? The chance of not getting the flu is 98% regardless, so how could you determine its the vaccine that helped?
The strains for the vaccine are selected so far in advance that even if influenza virus didn't mutate at a high level, it'd still be highly unlikely to succeed.
Popular
Back to top


1





