- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 30 Y/O father of 6 gunned down at 1am in Laffy
Posted on 7/17/15 at 9:46 pm to TheIndulger
Posted on 7/17/15 at 9:46 pm to TheIndulger
What reason is there to be out at 1 AM on a Friday morning if you aren't coming or going to work or having some other emergency?
just curious
and if you are the sort who is out at 1 AM on a Friday the probability that you adequately provide for the SIX children you fathered by 30 is not high
didn't deserve to get shot obviously but I learned about Darwin in school
just curious
and if you are the sort who is out at 1 AM on a Friday the probability that you adequately provide for the SIX children you fathered by 30 is not high
didn't deserve to get shot obviously but I learned about Darwin in school
Posted on 7/17/15 at 9:55 pm to ProjectP2294
quote:
At least he'll finally stop spawning future burdens on society.
why do you think his kids will be a burden n society? Please elaborate/
Posted on 7/17/15 at 10:01 pm to REB BEER
quote:
30 Y/O father of 6
Am i a bad person if i stopped reading here?
That poor, stupid man
Posted on 7/17/15 at 10:05 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
why do you think his kids will be a burden n society? Please elaborate/
Go to any random prison, and I guarantee you that 90% of the people in that prison were not planned or wanted kids and have major issues with their father. That's my evidence, and I'm just hoping they're either all strippers, or more hopefully gay so they don't have more kids that grow up to rob convenience stores.
Posted on 7/17/15 at 10:06 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
30 Y/O father of 6
sigh..
because only certain types have six or more kids right?
This post was edited on 7/17/15 at 10:09 pm
Posted on 7/17/15 at 10:11 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Go to any random prison, and I guarantee you that 90% of the people in that prison were not planned or wanted kids and have major issues with their father. That's my evidence,
and more than 99% of unplanned kids and even those with an absent or dead father do not end up being a burden on society.
Posted on 7/17/15 at 10:16 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
because only certain types have six or more kids right?
Only Mormons and Muslims have 6 or more kids on the reg these days and still come from United families. Not even the Catholics do that these days. I think it's a safe assumption that this guy wasn't out in the middle of a ghetto being shot by drug dealers at 1:00 in the morning for celebrating Ramadan or putting 10% of his earnings in a postal box to the Church of Latter Day Saints.
Plus in this day and age, it's wholly irresponsible to have 6 or more kids. It's not needed anymore and some are likely to become a burden on society. No one should ever have more than 5 kids (and even 5 is pushing it).
Posted on 7/17/15 at 10:19 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
and more than 99% of unplanned kids and even those with an absent or dead father do not end up being a burden on society.
I implore you to read the stats, since that is total and complete bullshite. The numbers of people who don't have fathers in their lives that end up in prison at least once are well into the double digit percentages. In fact foster kids are more likely to actually end up in prison at one point in their life than not ending up in prison at all. Any other feel good stats you care to make up?
Posted on 7/17/15 at 10:35 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
I implore you to read the stats, since that is total and complete bullshite. The numbers of people who don't have fathers in their lives that end up in prison at least once are well into the double digit percentages. In fact foster kids are more likely to actually end up in prison at one point in their life than not ending up in prison at all. Any other feel good stats you care to make up?
You are terrible at logic. 95% of those in prison have dark hair. ARe you gonna, then assume, that people with brown hair are likely to be a burden on society because most people in prison have brown hair? By the way, it seems like these kids have family to step in, so I do not get your foster family statement.
SUre, fatherless kids more likely to end up in jail due to being fatherless. ANd yes, 85% of incarcerated youths in jail are from fatherless homes. This is 20x the average of those not incarcerated. However, that does not mean it is more likely than not that they will end up in jail or even close to it. Your logic is fatally flawed
This post was edited on 7/17/15 at 10:39 pm
Posted on 7/17/15 at 10:37 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
quote: and more than 99% of unplanned kids and even those with an absent or dead father do not end up being a burden on society.
That's just plain bullshite.
Posted on 7/17/15 at 10:43 pm to High C
quote:
That's just plain bullshite.
SOrry to burst your bubble. SUre, an absent father puts kids at a greater risk for problems. BUt STILL..Fact: "... the great majority of children brought up in single-parent families do well. Differences in well-being on
average, to be moderate to small."
[U.S. government census statistics 1998; DHHS, "Percentage Distribution of Children in United States by Number
of Parents in Household, see Family Structure,
ANd the number of children living in single parent households and with an absent father has steadily increased since the 70s, while crime has decreased
This post was edited on 7/17/15 at 10:47 pm
Posted on 7/17/15 at 10:46 pm to shawnlsu
quote:
Just because he had 6 kids doesn't mean he was a father
And just because he's black doesn't mean he wasn't.
Posted on 7/17/15 at 10:50 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Just because he had 6 kids doesn't mean he was a father
And just because he's black doesn't mean he wasn't.
Posted on 7/17/15 at 10:53 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
You are terrible at logic. 95% of those in prison have dark hair. ARe you gonna, then assume, that people with brown hair are likely to be a burden on society because most people in prison have brown hair? By the way, it seems like these kids have family to step in, so I do not get your foster family statement.
SUre, fatherless kids more likely to end up in jail due to being fatherless. However, that does not mean it is more likely than not or even close to it. Your logic is fatally flawed
My logic is sound, and yours is bullshite. 99% don't go to jail? Really? The percentage of middle class families is higher than 1% of people who see the inside of a prison cell for at least something, like tax violations for instance. Go ask any murderer or serial rapist in prison how their relationship with old pops was, and I guarantee you just about all of them aren't going to have fond memories of him.
It's pretty fricking simple when you think about it. A piece of shite goes and impregnates some chick, says he's going to be there for them, but then stops the payments pretty quickly when the child is born, and may abandon the kid entirely. The mother can't afford to feed her fricking kids, and they're pissed at their life of poverty and daddy abandoning them. They look at society at large and see people with things they want, and they then decide when they get old and strong enough that they'll take it for themselves. Since mom was barely getting by and not giving a frick about her kid's education and values, and dad certainly wasn't there, they have little to no apprehension in going through with what they think is justified retribution. So eventually they get pissed off and steal, rape, or murder someone, and they leave society in shambles, but not before fricking 18 chicks and spitting out some babies they can't afford. And so continues the cycle.
The middle and upper class from a stable family don't think this way. How often do you hear about a 20 year old from a stable family of 4 putting a gun up to a millionaire's head asking for his money? It really just doesn't happen. Happens all the fricking time to the middle class when they're at the wrong place at the wrong time with the guy from a shattered family. Sorry to destroy your illusion that people from unstable households aren't just as well adjusted as people who come from loving families, but violence and neglect breeds more violence and neglect. It's a fricking fact.
This post was edited on 7/17/15 at 11:00 pm
Posted on 7/17/15 at 10:58 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
the great majority of children brought up in single-parent families do well. Differences in well-being on average, to be moderate to small." [U.S. government census statistics 1998; DHHS, "Percentage Distribution of Children in United States by Number of Parents in Household, see Family Structure,
What's the percentage they consider small? The number I have in my head is 15-20%. I'd be shocked if I was far off on this.
quote:
ANd the number of children living in single parent households and with an absent father has steadily increased since the 70s, while crime has decreased
And why is that? Could it be because of incarceration rates? Or could it be that 15 years after Roe vs Wade, crime rates suddenly and unexpectedly started to drop? That's my opinion is aborting the unwanted kids made sure they didn't steel or kill from wanted kids. You're proving my point here.
This post was edited on 7/17/15 at 11:00 pm
Posted on 7/17/15 at 11:01 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
And just because he's black doesn't mean he wasn't.
Wouldn't shock me if he thought OJ was innocent.
Posted on 7/17/15 at 11:01 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
SOrry to burst your bubble. SUre, an absent father puts kids at a greater risk for problems. BUt STILL..Fact: "... the great majority of children brought up in single-parent families do well. Differences in well-being on
average, to be moderate to small."
[U.S. government census statistics 1998; DHHS, "Percentage Distribution of Children in United States by Number
of Parents in Household, see Family Structure,
ANd the number of children living in single parent households and with an absent father has steadily increased since the 70s, while crime has decreased
I would love to see those statistics broken down by race Brother Farrakhan.
Posted on 7/17/15 at 11:04 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Wouldn't shock me if he thought OJ was innocent.
Popular
Back to top


1






