- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/18/17 at 7:34 am to soccerfüt
quote:
Volod Threads that are impossible to read. Do you agree?
Better than reading the same repetitive shite on the rant, because no one is smart enough to see if their dumb arse question or statement has been posted 47 times..
Posted on 9/18/17 at 7:34 am to soccerfüt
It's actually a pretty decent thread you douche
ETA- rosebud beat me to it
ETA- rosebud beat me to it
This post was edited on 9/18/17 at 7:35 am
Posted on 9/18/17 at 7:36 am to Mr. Hangover
I'm not taking it personally, I know it's the hangover speaking.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 7:39 am to soccerfüt
I'm not hungover, just burnt out on the same one liners being used 24/7 around here
The OT needs new material, too many copy cats and imitators around here
The OT needs new material, too many copy cats and imitators around here
Posted on 9/18/17 at 7:43 am to The Boat
Don't forget the fact that Russian railroads were different sizes than Germans. That slowed them down for a while. Also Russian roads were(are?) made of dirt. Very difficult to drive a tank down dirt
Posted on 9/18/17 at 7:45 am to volod
quote:
North Korea-Larger military than every NATO member except US
"Larger" by what standard? China has the largest army by numbers with over 1 million soldiers.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 7:46 am to Oilfieldbiology
I don't think railroads and dirt roads would be the biggest difficulties these days for a Russian invasion
Posted on 9/18/17 at 8:49 am to rsbd
I was referring to Hitler's invasion, not modern day logistics
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:10 am to ILeaveAtHalftime
quote:
If it's limited to each countries own military forces, I disagree with the entire list except for Russia, Iran, and Israel.
Switzerland is armed to the fricking teeth, they can form an organized militia of 400,000 in 24 hours, has mountainous terrain, bunkers built into the sides of multiple mountains enough to where they can abandon their cities and survive nuclear fallout, and their whole population is trained how to use arms. Per capita, I'm relatively certain Switzerland would be the most difficult country to invade.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:20 am to volod
I'd need a caveat on whether it's a scorched earth campaign or not, i.e. Whether civil casualties and infrastructure destruction are to be avoided or not.
If the invasion is just to wreck shite and take down the govt the list is drastically different than otherwise.
If the invasion is just to wreck shite and take down the govt the list is drastically different than otherwise.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:31 am to Rebel
quote:
The CSA invaded the USA after the USA started the War of Northern Agression.
and got their arse straight handed to them. frick a rebel yell. all your statues is mine.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:36 am to upgrayedd
quote:
Russia has been invaded multiple times
Goddamn, you're dumb.
"SuccessfullY invade" might have been a better use of language, but we can all agree invasions of Russia have not gone well.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:37 am to OMLandshark
quote:
Per capita, I'm relatively certain Switzerland would be the most difficult country to invade.
Come on man.
The fat rednecks of the South are going to be all the defense the U.S. needs.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:42 am to CaptainBrannigan
quote:
"Larger" by what standard? China has the largest army by numbers with over 1 million soldiers.
China isn't a NATO member.
Neither is India who also has a larger military force than the USA.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 9:45 am to Jcorye1
quote:
And both Napoleon and Hitler's attempts were absolute disasters.
Hitler almost did it. It literally took an entire city eating rats and generally just being weird Russians to not lose.
And that is why Russia would make the list. Those weird crazy, rat eating bastards are not going to be subjugated by anyone but their own subjugators. "Stalin may be a mass murdering hyper authoritarian psychopath, but he's OUR mass murdering hyper authoritarian psychopath!"
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:20 am to volod
quote:
And both Napoleon and Hitler's attempts were absolute disasters.
And between Napoleon and Hitler there was this little scrap we now call World War I. People tend to forget that invasion of Russia worked out pretty well for the invaders then...
(The shaded in areas are lands lost by Russia per the terms of the Treaty of Brest-Litovisk.)
This post was edited on 9/18/17 at 10:21 am
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:22 am to volod
quote:
He references this in his video.
And both Napoleon and Hitler's attempts were absolute disasters.
Yeah, well you didn't have a video posted when I commented
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:23 am to td01241
quote:
So many countries hate Israel if they banded together they could take it
Nonsense. it's actually the other way around. If the US didn't hold Israel back they would wipe out the countries in that region that hate them.
Posted on 9/18/17 at 10:25 am to td01241
quote:
So many countries hate Israel if they banded together they could take it
They've tried multiple times and got their asses whipped every time.
Popular
Back to top



2








