Started By
Message
locked post

Would you support a Derek Carr trade today?

Posted on 10/29/23 at 10:20 pm
Posted by Brightside Bengal
New Metairie
Member since Sep 2007
3968 posts
Posted on 10/29/23 at 10:20 pm
Assuming we just get some random draft picks in exchange, would you support trading Carr this week just to get out of his contract? As of yesterday, no one would have taken it on.
Posted by Tigerpride18
Lakewood Colorado
Member since Sep 2017
33336 posts
Posted on 10/29/23 at 10:29 pm to
No, see how it plays out this year
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
83341 posts
Posted on 10/29/23 at 10:31 pm to
How much would we lose in dead money? Because i assume its a frick ton of dead money
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
63685 posts
Posted on 10/29/23 at 10:31 pm to
I think the guaranteed money give to Carr means we are pot committed to him for at least 2 years.

If I thought we could get out from under that contract by trading him, I'd do it in a heartbeat.
Posted by Tigerpride18
Lakewood Colorado
Member since Sep 2017
33336 posts
Posted on 10/29/23 at 10:33 pm to
You wouldn’t receive shite if it happened
Posted by Rand AlThor
Member since Jan 2014
10432 posts
Posted on 10/29/23 at 10:37 pm to
literally impossible cap wise so no

purely from a, “do I want this player on the team?” perspective, sure, I’d trade him. Mostly because I think our cap situation is not great and I’d personally prefer a full reset. If we’re going to be stuck as a middling 7-10, 8-9, 9-8 type team, I’d prefer to just blow it up and bottom out. Suck for 5 years and truly rebuild.

But that isn’t the Saints MO so we are likely stuck with Carr for 3-5 years imo
Posted by higgsBoson
Democratic Party
Member since Jan 2012
1627 posts
Posted on 10/29/23 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

But that isn’t the Saints MO so we are likely stuck with Carr for 3-5 years imo


I’m curious to know the teams thinking. Like would they ever go full rebuild or will they just keep signing free agents? If the core guys can’t play do they rebuild? I’m having trouble seeing a world where they do it. I think for them the name of the game is stability. Stability == consistent money. I don’t know how much it would cost them to bottom out but I imagine it would be a lot!
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13939 posts
Posted on 10/29/23 at 11:03 pm to
He has a no trade clause.
Posted by WestlakeTiger
San Antonio, Tejas
Member since Feb 2012
9510 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 12:21 am to
Bet the Vikings would look into it.
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
83341 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 6:21 am to
Doubt it, the vikings are coming to an end of their version of the derek carr experience and huge contract. They are dropping cousins after this year anyway to rebuild and prob draft a qb. Doubt they want to re-frick themselves
Posted by Geauxldilocks
Member since Aug 2018
6613 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 6:33 am to
quote:

Bet the Vikings would look into it.


Why would they? That you want them to take Carr on shows how bad a deal you think we have.

Would you have suggested a trade for Brees when he was 31?
Posted by LSU4ever2002
Member since Sep 2009
743 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 7:08 am to
quote:

get out of his contract?


Not how the NFL works
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
72483 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 7:13 am to
[quote]just to get out of his contract?[/quote

frick yes.
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 7:38 am to
No.

Winston sucks.
Posted by FriscoTiger1973
Frisco, Texas
Member since Jan 2012
1414 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 9:43 am to
Yes, I’ve seen enough!
Posted by Double Oh
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2008
24686 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Assuming we just get some random draft picks in exchange, would you support trading Carr this week just to get out of his contract? As of yesterday, no one would have taken it on.





And let Winston be the QB? hell fukin nooooooooooooooooooo
Posted by tigerterrace
Mobile, Alabama
Member since Sep 2016
3475 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 1:16 pm to
I would trade anyone if the price is right.

I mean you have to listen.
Posted by tonyarm99
Member since Sep 2017
204 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 1:21 pm to
Nobody wanted him when he was with Raiders! Thats why the Raiders cut him because they could not find a trade partner
Posted by Rand AlThor
Member since Jan 2014
10432 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

If the core guys can’t play do they rebuild? I’m having trouble seeing a world where they do it.


For now, they literally have no choice. They could cut every player who gives positive cap relief in 2024 and they'd only cut $15M into the $75M hole they have. They have to extend/restructure some players to get into the green and be compliant.

Since that is the case, might as well try to compete while we have some of the better players on our roster. Realistically the most feasible path forward is to hold onto Carr for a few more seasons.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
22257 posts
Posted on 10/30/23 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

Nobody wanted him when he was with Raiders! Thats why the Raiders cut him because they could not find a trade partner

Carr had a no trade clause and dictated which teams could talk to the Raiders to make an offer for him. You really can’t so other teams weren’t interested when Carr was allowed to dictate who could make the call.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram