- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Working our way to the Number 1 Overall Draft Pick; could be traded for a Bundle !!
Posted on 12/4/25 at 8:54 am to tzimme4
Posted on 12/4/25 at 8:54 am to tzimme4
quote:
The Saints need to trade a high pick for a seasoned QB the same route the Lions went with Goff.
Lions actually got a first for taking on Goff. His contract was viewed as that toxic around the league.
This post was edited on 12/4/25 at 8:56 am
0
Posted on 12/4/25 at 8:55 am to tzimme4
quote:
The Saints need to trade a high pick for a seasoned QB the same route the Lions went with Goff
Your analogy is misguided.
Detroit didn't trade any picks to get Goff. They gave up Stafford in exchange for two 1st round picks and a 3rd in addition to Goff from LA. The Saints don't have anyone on their roster to get such a haul in return.
So what you are really arguing is that the Saints do what the Rams did, and trade high picks to get a seasoned vet. However, the Rams were in win-now mode when they made that trade. The Saints aren't, and they don't have the assets to trade for a (potential) HOF QB like Stafford anyway.
I guess if the Cardinals want to GIVE the Saints a 1st round pick and Kyler Murray in exchange for Sough, your analogy would make sense. But doubt that happens. You don't trade a 1st round pick for Kyler Murray.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 9:17 am to Alt26
I never suggested trading for Murray, especially for a 1st
Posted on 12/4/25 at 9:18 am to tzimme4
Trading for a “seasoned” qb in our situation makes zero sense. Maybe in a year or two if the young qbs don’t pan out.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 9:45 am to NIH
Its obvious the QBs on the roster aren't NFL starters. Shough will be a decent backup though.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 9:51 am to tzimme4
Ok, guy.
Posted on 12/4/25 at 10:17 am to DJ3K
quote:
I want the Jets, Raiders, and Cardinals to fall in love with Mendoza and Moore with the Jets winning out and trading the 3 #1s to move up a spot or two
1st pick Arvell Reese
2nd pick best WR
3rd pick best interior lineman
Best I could do is an injury prone DE in RD1 from some no where school
Big potential injury prone OL RD2 from some school like Wazzu
Huge reach CB RD3 from Ohio State's 3rd team defense
Posted on 12/4/25 at 8:58 pm to Suntiger
quote:
Bad news is that I’m not sure there is a QB that anyone wants to trade up for.
We really have no idea? Teams always overreach for QBs. They are overvalued and teams will absolutely fall in love with one player. All it takes is 1 team to fall in love with one QB and you can use that as leverage
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:49 pm to TigerSaurus
Loomis will trade the pick and next years draft to get pick 0.5
What a dumbass.
What a dumbass.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 2:41 pm to Snipe
quote:
I trust Mickey to handle this.
You had to ruin the moment. I know it's sarcasm, but it still hurts.
Posted on 12/5/25 at 10:24 pm to TigerSaurus
Yes
Please
Page 2 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News