Started By
Message

re: Who is Gayle’s successor?

Posted on 6/22/20 at 9:20 am to
Posted by Large Farva
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2013
8317 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 9:20 am to
Tried to say he was insane and couldn’t make his own decisions.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278394 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 9:21 am to
quote:

What exactly did Rita do to get on Tom’s bad side?


Didn’t like Gayle
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166258 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 9:21 am to
quote:

Tried to say he was insane and couldn’t make his own decisions.


that was after she was already on his bad side.
Posted by ellishughtiger
70118
Member since Jul 2004
21135 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 9:34 am to
Did Tom give Rita $200mm and then told her to kick rocks?
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51664 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 9:56 am to
you mean who takes over after she is forced to sell the team because she helped cover up a massive sex scandal?
Posted by Demshoes
Up in here
Member since Aug 2015
10194 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 11:31 am to
Brought up the reasonable issue that perhaps the woman half his age who was perhaps having relations with him had ulterior motives and was trying to become the riches woman in New Orleans.

I would have slept with Tom for ownership of the Saints.

Rita was also a terrible person from what I've heard.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41194 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

I am a lifelong Catholic, but I would be careful leaving anything like this to the archdiocese while their bankruptcy proceedings are pending.


The franchise will be left in a trust (like the Seahawks) the profits will be given to Catholic Charities, directly to schools (ie Brother Martin), and other charities
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278394 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

the profits will be given to Catholic Charities, directly to schools (ie Brother Martin), and other charities



Unless the other 90% of these emails thru are trying to hide are uncovered.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64346 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 1:20 pm to
They are not hiding them.
They are right there they just believe they have a legal and constitutional right to keep them private.

Big difference. Hiding vs constitutional rights.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278394 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 1:29 pm to
They are actively fighting to keep them private. They are hiding them. Read the story.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64346 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 1:43 pm to
Jeezus christos.

Stick to your incorrect use of words les if it makes you feel better.



PS

Saints attorneys dispute any suggestion the team helped cover up crimes and say the documents were intended to be private.

The emails were sent from team email addresses host on NFL.com domains, but the league has not commented on the case. According to The Associated Press, NFL policy states that anyone part of the league must refrain from "conduct detrimental to the integrity of and public confidence" of the league.


Holy sh!t les I should be a detective
This post was edited on 6/22/20 at 1:50 pm
Posted by SippyCup
Gulf Coast
Member since Sep 2008
6141 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

It’s left to a trust with the archdiocese and ochsner being the beneficiaries. Dennis Lauscha is one of the trustees.


This is accurate and the NFL was furious when they found out.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278394 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 2:18 pm to
The saints released 10% of 300-something emails

They refuse to release the other 90%. They’ve already been caught lying regarding their timeline. They are absolutely hiding them.

Read the story or shut up
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
15554 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 3:08 pm to
They have a legal right to not release them dumb arse. They don’t have to without a court order
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278394 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 3:26 pm to
The public, and especially the victims, deserves to know the truth

They are hiding something and it won’t be pretty when it’s uncovered
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
11909 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

The public, and especially the victims, deserves to know the truth

They are hiding something and it won’t be pretty when it’s uncovered

They are adhering to a legal document as there is a lawsuit ongoing. They cannot simply release them regardless of the legal process.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278394 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 4:35 pm to
Yes they can. They’ve already released some. The others were marked as ‘confidential’ and an independent judge ruled in the saints favor to keep them sealed.

Read the story
This post was edited on 6/22/20 at 4:46 pm
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64346 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 5:42 pm to
Shut up?

What are you?

Two?

You used the word "hiding" incorrectly.

Refusing is one of the many words that would have been correct but you insist on your poor choice of words.

Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278394 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 5:47 pm to
Any one of these definitions fit


Posted by bearhc
Member since Sep 2009
4936 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 5:51 pm to
A group involving the Mannings.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram