- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Which team worries you the most when it comes to playoffs?
Posted on 12/30/18 at 8:14 pm to bonethug0180
Posted on 12/30/18 at 8:14 pm to bonethug0180
quote:
Cardinals and 9ers.
Well you seem to really care about the teams, same ones that held Gurley to 15/63 and 19/42?
Gurley 33/105
Anderson 43/299
Yada Yada Yada
Watch the games baw
Posted on 12/30/18 at 8:36 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
Josh Reynolds is plug and play for kupp, May be even more of threat tbh
Just wanted to come back to this insanity.
Kupp in games in which he had a catch (only one played without a catch and that's when he went out very early):
7 games
40 catches
566 yards
14.2 ypc
6 TDs
Reynolds in games in which he had a catch (all but one in which Kupp was out or mostly out):
10 games
29 catches
402 yards
13.9 ypc
5 TDs
In 3 less games Kupp has better numbers across the board.
Kupp per game:
5.7 catches
80.8 yards
0.86 TDs
Reynolds per games:
2.9 cathes
40.2 yards
0.5 TDs
Kupp doubles him in catches and yards per game. That's a significant drop off and it has shown in their games.
And this is being kind to Reynolds. If we did it by total games played "8" for Kupp to 16 for Reynolds) it becomes a gulf. I did it this way to be more fair in comparison.
On a per snap basis it would also be worse for Reynolds, as Kupp had 439 to Reynolds 541 + whatever he played today.
This post was edited on 12/30/18 at 8:42 pm
Posted on 12/30/18 at 8:46 pm to NeverRains
For me, it’s about the QB’s so Seattle and Russell Wilson scares me most in NFC.
Bears, Cowboys, Eagles no chance in dome in my opinion.
Bears, Cowboys, Eagles no chance in dome in my opinion.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 8:50 pm to tibebecolston
I mostly agree it's about the QB, which is why Seattle would make me a little uneasy, but that Chicago D is rivaling that Legion of Boom D. If they had a better offense like Seattle had their stats would be much better.
Chicago's defense literally wins games for them (look at how they smothered the Rams and Vikings until they just cracked). That defense is a game changer and forces turnovers, and that is the scariest part. Turnovers greatly affect the game and they go get them.
They also go get the QB. With how banged up or Oline has been I don't want to test that Dline. The Cowboys Dline did a number on us (in Dallas). The Bears Dline could give us fits.
Chicago's defense literally wins games for them (look at how they smothered the Rams and Vikings until they just cracked). That defense is a game changer and forces turnovers, and that is the scariest part. Turnovers greatly affect the game and they go get them.
They also go get the QB. With how banged up or Oline has been I don't want to test that Dline. The Cowboys Dline did a number on us (in Dallas). The Bears Dline could give us fits.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 8:53 pm to wasteland
quote:
Absolutely Chicago
I think our defense would bottle their O up honestly.
if we stifled their running attack and made Mitch beat us then we'd be in business.
but the Bears have the best D-line in the league to me.
our old friend Hicks and Ed Goldman in the middle.
Mack and Floyd bringing heat from the outside.
our O-line's health concerns are something you cant ignore.
hopefully i'm worrying for nothing
Posted on 12/30/18 at 8:58 pm to LooseCannon22282
It'd be by far the best offense vs. by FAR the best defense in the NFC on one side, with the worst or second worst offense (either Chi or Dal is the worst) vs. the third best defense in the NFC on the other side (Chi and Dal having better Ds than us).
All rankings based only on the playoff teams.
It could be a 10-6 type of game.
If our Oline gets and stays healthy, I'd feel miles better about it, but currently that looks like a bad matchup (our Oline vs. their Dline).
All rankings based only on the playoff teams.
It could be a 10-6 type of game.
If our Oline gets and stays healthy, I'd feel miles better about it, but currently that looks like a bad matchup (our Oline vs. their Dline).
This post was edited on 12/30/18 at 9:01 pm
Posted on 12/30/18 at 9:06 pm to bonethug0180
i'm jacked for the playoffs on one hand yet still feel the chill from what happened at the end of last year.
it's a big mystery what will happen in these games.
the game(s) could go totally opposite from what we think may happen.
seattle does not scare me.
I think Russ Wilson is great but I think the rankings speak for themselves.
Rams and Bears are who we should worry about.
I think we'd kick the shite out of Dally in a rematch at the Dome.
we played our worst game offensively all year against them and still only lost by 3. Dally can be had.
they are fools gold.
it's a big mystery what will happen in these games.
the game(s) could go totally opposite from what we think may happen.
seattle does not scare me.
I think Russ Wilson is great but I think the rankings speak for themselves.
Rams and Bears are who we should worry about.
I think we'd kick the shite out of Dally in a rematch at the Dome.
we played our worst game offensively all year against them and still only lost by 3. Dally can be had.
they are fools gold.
Posted on 12/30/18 at 10:29 pm to bonethug0180
Da frick
I wasn’t literally comparing them as they are nothing alike and Reynolds doesn’t play slot. I assumed you could follow along but I forgot you just read da box score
I’m talking about a weapons standpoint that needs to be accounted for. Reynolds is just another starting caliber WR they can throw in there. Allows woods to play the slot. They don’t miss a beat
I wasn’t literally comparing them as they are nothing alike and Reynolds doesn’t play slot. I assumed you could follow along but I forgot you just read da box score
I’m talking about a weapons standpoint that needs to be accounted for. Reynolds is just another starting caliber WR they can throw in there. Allows woods to play the slot. They don’t miss a beat
Posted on 12/30/18 at 10:37 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
Josh Reynolds is plug and play for kupp,
What it seems like you are saying is Reynolds can replace Kupp's role and production from that comment.
Now you claim something else, and even if that's true he definitely doesn't come close to needing to be accounted for as much as Kupp (although you also said Reynolds is maybe more of a threat, which I proved is laughable), and they have been missing a beat without Kupp.
And I've watched several of their games and Reynolds is basically our Keith Kirkwood. He'll make a good play every few games, but he isn't drawing more than one defender.
So saying he needs to be "accounted for" is pointless. Every player needs to be accounted for. You can't leave anyone running open. He draws zero doubles (unless running from one zone to another with no other players around).
And the fact remains he only has half the production Kupp has on a per game basis (being generous to Reynolds).
This post was edited on 12/30/18 at 10:40 pm
Posted on 12/30/18 at 10:53 pm to bonethug0180
Chicago scares me the most
That defense is nasty
I think everyone here wouldn't be mad if Philly takes them out.
Also rams are missing kupp and Reynolds isn't on his level but the rams offense has been figured out some also
That defense is nasty
I think everyone here wouldn't be mad if Philly takes them out.
Also rams are missing kupp and Reynolds isn't on his level but the rams offense has been figured out some also
Posted on 12/31/18 at 2:41 pm to s-man
quote:
Rodney Harrison thinks it’s the Bears because of the....offense. No shite, he said it.
Rodney Harrison has drain bamage. Early onset CTE. The dude will be babbling and weaving like Muhammad Ali in a few years.
This post was edited on 12/31/18 at 2:42 pm
Posted on 12/31/18 at 2:57 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
Well you seem to really care about the teams, same ones that held Gurley to 15/63 and 19/42?
Gurley 33/105
Anderson 43/299
Yada Yada Yada
Watch the games baw
The first Cards game was the second game of the year, the Rams won 34-0, and Brown had 12 carries for 46 yards in mop up duty.
Gurley did have a terrible ypc that game (2.2), but he also was going against a fresh Dline early in the season and early in that game. He didn't get a chance to keep running as that defense wore out towards the end.
The first 9ers game was 39-10 and again Brown had mop up duty with 13 carries for 65 yards. And Gurley had a pretty good 4.2 ypc going before being pulled.
Maybe take your own advice and watch the games baw.
What Anderson did was run out the games against two of the worst teams in the league who were far out of the playoffs at that point.
And this is a fresh Anderson going against exhausted Dlines at the end of the year. Dude barely had any tread run off this year.
Dude had 24 carries and 1 catch in 54 snaps over 9 games (highest being 12 snaps), and he had just come off a 1,000 yard season. Dude was hungry and fresh, but he's still no Gurley.
This post was edited on 12/31/18 at 3:08 pm
Posted on 12/31/18 at 3:07 pm to GynoSandberg
Love the well thought out rebuttal.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 3:22 pm to bonethug0180
you come back a day later and want me to argue some bullshite you came up with in an attempt to refute statistical facts
I never said he was Todd Gurley. Again you miss the big picture in an attempt to flex your tiny nuts on someone
I never said he was Todd Gurley. Again you miss the big picture in an attempt to flex your tiny nuts on someone
Posted on 12/31/18 at 8:31 pm to NeverRains
Bears...That pass rush is scary.
Posted on 12/31/18 at 10:13 pm to NeverRains
The Saints are the only team that can beat the Saints.
Popular
Back to top

1







