- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trade Ideas
Posted on 2/13/10 at 9:55 am to blueslover
Posted on 2/13/10 at 9:55 am to blueslover
quote:
Jammal + Reggie + our #64
quote:
Aaron Curry, Justin Forsett, & #6 + #38 pick
are they retarded???are you retarded????
never gonna happen==a broken down average left tackle,a 3rd down running back and a 2 for their #1 draft choice last year, a serviceable back plus an early first AND an early second...
I'm all for it
This post was edited on 2/13/10 at 9:58 am
0
Posted on 2/13/10 at 10:00 am to CU-onda-BIU
quote:
Did you people not see how Bushrod got mercilessly abused this year?
Bushrod needs help at times, but he's a good value even with getting a new contract. The core is going to be getting a payday and we made the SuperBowl with Bushrod, so I think the team benefits more from the $3 - $5 million per year savings you get with Bushrod vs. Brown.
Posted on 2/13/10 at 3:13 pm to CU-onda-BIU
I think it was 7 sacks Bushrod gave up. I wouldn't characterize his performance for the year as "mercilessly abused" though. He had some bad outings but also some very good games in fact. Considering how he was thrust after never starting and coming from Towson it was even respectable IMO. I recognize the quality level of Brown. I think most are just scared to see a long term commitment made to a guy who looks like he could fall apart physically at anytime. Bushrod for his price is quite a deal.
With the RFA look a 1st for Brown could add some more youth and depth there. Even with his knees plenty of teams would go a 1st, maybe even the 1st & 3rd tender.
With the RFA look a 1st for Brown could add some more youth and depth there. Even with his knees plenty of teams would go a 1st, maybe even the 1st & 3rd tender.
Posted on 2/13/10 at 4:47 pm to blueslover
OSI benched because he was not producing and looking terrible against the run. Would rather Kampman from Green Bay
This post was edited on 2/13/10 at 4:47 pm
Posted on 2/13/10 at 5:09 pm to blueslover
quote:That would mean spending a #1 or a #2 to replace Bush. That doens't make sense to me when we have much bigger needs on defense. We need a WLB, a thug DT and a pass rushing DE. We also need more depth at SLB and MLB (I don't like Mithchell and Evans as our backups at those positions).
I could see Spiller, Best, or McCluster added in replacement
This post was edited on 2/13/10 at 5:11 pm
Posted on 2/13/10 at 5:19 pm to L.A.
quote:
That would mean spending a #1 or a #2 to replace Bush.
from the original post:
Leroy Hill or Aaron Curry (another WFer) could be attractive.
A 2nd escalating to a 1st+ with performance clauses.
------------
So with that scenario you would be getting a LB upgrade or a 1/2 rd pick.
Ya never know Carroll could still have him some Reggie love similar to Ditka with Rickey. Overpay and get rid of his bloated contract would be a dream scenario.
Posted on 2/13/10 at 7:19 pm to GeauxFurniss
we have a Pro Bowl MLB-#61 Vilma. We need outside help. Pearce is over the hill.
Posted on 2/14/10 at 12:00 am to Six Saint
Curry isn't tho
Posted on 2/14/10 at 11:10 am to blueslover
Jammal Brown for Glenn Dorsey = win/win
-KC needs an upgrade at LT. Branden Albert is probably better suited at RT.
-Dorsey doesn't belong in a 3-4 system and will probably be a draft bust if he doesn't get moved.
-Saints fill a position of need with a veteran.
-Saints more free to draft best player available
-KC needs an upgrade at LT. Branden Albert is probably better suited at RT.
-Dorsey doesn't belong in a 3-4 system and will probably be a draft bust if he doesn't get moved.
-Saints fill a position of need with a veteran.
-Saints more free to draft best player available
Posted on 2/14/10 at 11:21 am to coldhotwings
Dorsey is in the Ellis mold IMO. A purer nose tackle needed for run D IMO. With the limitations I'm guessing Clancy will be back too unless he is completely used up.
Posted on 2/14/10 at 11:37 am to blueslover
quote:
Dorsey is in the Ellis mold IMO. A purer nose tackle needed for run D IMO. With the limitations I'm guessing Clancy will be back too unless he is completely used up.
I think Ellis could beef up quite a bit and fill that role. He already has the strength and 10 more pounds will make him the nose tackle you r talking about at around 320 lbs. Clancy was never anything special and is probably spent.
Posted on 2/14/10 at 11:52 am to coldhotwings
could be possible for Ellis I guess, he just seems much more of a penetrator than clogger in style. You find him making plays way out of the box in pursuit. It's a bad D and wrong scheme for Dorsey tho. I'd take KC #36 pick and a throw in player before Dorsey to get a better fit player and more bang for the buck ratio.
Posted on 2/14/10 at 12:01 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
Jammal Brown for a 1st or 2 2nds.
So other teams are run by ra-tards now?
Posted on 2/14/10 at 12:11 pm to blueslover
quote:
It's a bad D and wrong scheme for Dorsey tho.
How is this? New Orleans plays from the 4-3 90% of the time and GW's primary goal is to go after the QB and cause mistakes. Dorsey did that in college from a 4-3 but couldn't as a 3-4 NT in the NFL and then moved to DE. Dorsey is probably begging to play in a D such as New Orleans.
Posted on 2/14/10 at 12:18 pm to BBATiger
Jammal Brown for a 1st or 2 2nds.
I'd guess market value as one low first at best, one second rounder more likely. 2 pro bowls, good mauler, just the health risk. Proven LT's are premium value
I'd guess market value as one low first at best, one second rounder more likely. 2 pro bowls, good mauler, just the health risk. Proven LT's are premium value
Posted on 2/14/10 at 12:23 pm to coldhotwings
quote:
How is this?
no, THAT is what I meant, bad fit in KC now.
Still think he is an Ellis clone in style (just less effective thus far). You are suggesting changing Ellis into something he isn't. Not saying that couldn't happen. But changing an already effective player to replace him with one that has been less effective in that role and hope the other player is effective in being a plugger doesn't seem too wise to me. Keep Ellis as he is and get a pick out of Brown that you can translate into a more specific need and also cheaper than another top 5 pick contract.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News